The primary purpose of the passage is toA) suggest new ways in which the banking industry can better protect the privacy of its customers - The author is not suggesting new ways of any sort.
B) criticize the FSMA for infringing on the privacy rights of bank customers - The author mostly does not take a stand and rather presents what promoters and haters are saying about FSMA.
C) discuss a specific concern arising out of the passage of the FSMA - Correct.
D) detail the ways in which biographical data can be shared among the multi-purpose financial affiliations made possible by the FSMA - True but not the primary purpose. Too detailed and goes a bit beyond scope
E) present a balanced view of the pros and cons of the FSMA - The author is presenting a balanced view but if you think about it he is kind of discussing rather than mentioning pros and cons of FSMA. Pros can be a lot bigger than just privacy. Economy, jobs and what not. But none of that is discussed. So if you were to pick between C and E, C is a better choice.
The Banking Act of 1933 was designed to regulate banking activities byA) limiting the manner in which banks marketed their loans to consumers - No Mention
B) increasing enforcement of customer privacy laws - No mention
C) banning financial institutions from intermingling their marketing efforts - Correct
D) guaranteeing loans for small businesses that were badly hurt by the Depression - No Mention
E) establishing laws that recognized certain banking procedures that were already in practice - No Mention
Note : If you think about it there are only 2 lines where author mentions this old law. If you reread then it will make sense that B is just rephrased version of what is already in the passage.
The author's attitude toward the Financial Services Modernization Act is best described asA) uncaring, but thorough - I won't call it thorough for sure. But uncaring is not right. The author seems to be concern about the issue or privacy arising out of FSMA
B) adulatory, but clearly biased - He is not biased.
C) skeptical, but knowledgeable - We can argue he is skeptical but you can't prove he is knowledgable. If I just state the fact that defenders of recent policy introduced by US government are mentioning so and so; that does not make me knowledgeable.
D) balanced, though alert to problems - Makes this the right choice.
E) analytical, though troubled - He is not analytical.
According to the passage, the laws that make up the Financial Services Modernization ActA) legitimize a trend that had already been set in motion - Again, first paragraph and already mentioned. Just rephrased.
B) fulfill a purpose not unlike that of the Banking Act of 1933
C) supersede privacy laws regarding biographical data on bank customers
D) are viewed with suspicion by most people outside the banking industry
E) contain no measures designed to protect customer confidentiality
According to the passage, all of the following statements describe ways in which a customer could be affected by the Financial Services Modernization Act EXCEPTA) the fact that the customer has high blood pressure is shared by a bank and its affiliated insurance company - Relates to medical data ( And it is true as well in this world, take Apple watch for example sending data to your doctors :P)
B) information regarding the customer’s last occupation is given by a bank to a brokerage house without the customer’s knowledge - Related to employment
C) a call is made to the customer by a local political party that wishes to determine his party affiliation - No Mention. But I checked twice to make sure there is no mention of the word Policital
D) the customer receives sales information through the mail from a business that has bought a profile on the customer’s buying habits - kinda related to mention of customer "opting out". I could not find a strong reference but it is mentioned.
E) the same institution that has handled the customer’s savings now sells him life insurance - Related to insurance company[/box_in][/box_out][/quote]