Hi arushi118,Yes, you've got the ranking exactly right! The table tells us the models are listed best to worst from top to bottom, so the overall performance order is X > W > Y > Z > V.
Now, the key question is: for each test, do the scores go UP or DOWN as we move from the best model (X) to the worst model (V)?
Test A: X =
10068, W =
9675, Y =
8369, Z =
7667, V =
6970. Scores DECREASE as performance gets worse. This means higher scores = better performance. So:
Greater scores are better.Test B: X =
87, W =
104, Y =
121, Z =
130, V =
119. Scores generally INCREASE as performance gets worse. The best model (X) has the LOWEST score of
87. This means higher scores = worse performance. So:
Greater scores are worse.Test C: X =
68, W =
82, Y =
103, Z =
93, V =
87. Again, scores generally INCREASE as performance gets worse. The best model (X) has the LOWEST score of
68. So:
Greater scores are worse.Key Insight: You might notice that Tests B and C don't perfectly increase from top to bottom (for example, V has
119 on Test B, which is less than Z's
130).
That's okay — don't fall into the trap of expecting a perfect sequence. The question says the models are ranked by OVERALL performance, not by any single test. The general trend is what matters, and the trend clearly shows that better-performing models have lower scores on Tests B and C.