A. The transit authority's special committee will weigh the merits of the day pass when it reconvenes.
Irrelevant, we don't care if the committee reassess the situation, it may or may not bring anything useful.
B. The average commuter is dissatisfied with the price of the subway and is turning to other methods of transportation.
We don't have any data whether commuters are turning to other means of transportation
C. Discounting the day pass would put a strain on funds normally reserved for emergency measures.
We are not told in any way that the new method will somehow harm the funds
D. The cost of one ride on the subway, regardless of the length of the ride or the time of day, is no more than $1.25
CorrectImagine if the cost per one way for average commuters was higher than $1.25 than newe method would benefit them.
for instance if one way ticket was 3$, going to work and returning from work would roughly cost 6 $ per day to an average commuter. This method would surely benefit commuters by helping to reduce commuting cost per day. However if ticket was $1 instead of $3, than it wouldn't make sense for an average commuter to go for the new method since he or she would already spend less than what new method proposes
E. A four-day pass at a cost of $10 would be equally useful to tourists.
This is telling the same thing in the argument