Hi NetOrb,You've spotted the exact word that trips almost everyone here, and your reading of the
slope is actually correct. The catch is what "reduction" is measured
against.
Notice the comparison the sentence fixes for you:
"Compared to the risk with no consumption of Beverage Z..." No consumption is the baseline, and that baseline sits at
1.00 on the y-axis. So the
reduction at any point on the curve is:
reduction =
1.00 - (curve value at that point)
It is
not the drop from the start of a range to the end of that range (that would be a slope, or a
change within the range). The base never moves - it stays at
1.00 the whole time.
Reading it off the curve1-3 glasses: the curve sits around
0.97 down to ~
0.90 - reduction of about
0.03-
0.10.
4-6 glasses: the curve bottoms out near
0.88 - reduction of about
0.12. This is where the curve is
farthest below 1.00.
7-8 glasses: the curve has climbed back to ~
0.93 - reduction shrinks again.
So even though the curve is nearly flat in
4-6 (small slope), that flat part sits at the
lowest value - meaning the gap below the
1.00 baseline is biggest there.
Greatest reduction = 4-6.Your second point answers itself with this base: the question asks for the biggest reduction from
1.00, which is the same location as the lowest risk value - so "greatest reduction" and "lowest risk" point to the same range,
4-6.
Quick rehearsal to lock it in: baseline =
100. Suppose the curve reads
90 in the
1-3 range and
88 in the
4-6 range. Reduction is
100 -
90 =
10 versus
100 -
88 =
12. The
12 wins - you always subtract from the fixed baseline, not from the previous range.
Answer: Dropdown 1: Greatest; Dropdown 2: 4-6NetOrb
For which range *reduction* in relative risk is greatest-
1-3 - it reduces from 0.97 to 0.9
4-6 - 0.89 to 0.9 (flattish)
7-8 increases
So why is greatest and 1-3 not the answer?
And if we want to say risk is least? Then shouldnt least option be selected?
But it specifically says reduction in risk
Not the lowest risk