Quote:
*Thank you guys for quick responses ,hope everyone responds
I’d be careful drawing conclusions like that. Schools don’t shape their interview invites around short-term “industry hype” like AI or digital transformation. Admissions is a long-term bet on leadership potential and fit with the program, not on whatever field is trending this year. If you look at past classes, AI and tech folks were already well-represented even before ChatGPT and GenAI became buzzwords, not because of “AI,” but because those applicants often show analytical strength, impact, and adaptability. The same can be said for consultants, nonprofit leaders, and entrepreneurs. Every cycle has strong candidates from each area. Also, schools don’t optimize interview invites for placement stats that early in the process. That happens much later, when they’re helping students recruit. Admissions teams care more about whether someone will contribute to the classroom, handle the academics, and align with their culture.
So while polls like this are interesting, they rarely reveal meaningful “trends.” They mostly reflect which applicants are active in this chat or comfortable sharing their status. Real insights come from class profiles after the cycle ends and post 1 year like wharton that released its class profile a few days ago, not from mid-round anecdotes. Instead of overanalyzing trends, it’s better to start reflecting on your own application. Ask where you can enrich your story or fill any gaps for R2. These polls don’t help anyone per say, tomorrow you’ll see someone from a “non-AI” background get in, and the theory falls apart. Adcoms build classes, not clusters. Let us focus on what you can control.