Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0401:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Jun 0408:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
Jun 0612:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Jun 0809:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
A powerful GMAT course taught live online + 6 months of access to TTP OnDemand GMAT Masterclass included! date of event Class begins June 8, 2026
Jun 0803:00 PM PDT
-04:00 PM PDT
15 Full-length GMAT FE mocks with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!- Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program.. 
Jun 1111:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
6 months of access to over 400 hours of video lessons date of event No date.
07 Jul 2025, 09:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
Condition One:
Only the proportion of fragile boxes, which is 2/3 of the total number of boxes, is known.
No information is available regarding the distribution of electronic products.
It is impossible to determine whether electronic products exceed half of the fragile category.
(1) Insufficient
Condition Two:
The total proportion of boxes containing electronic products is known to be 4/5.
However, the distribution of fragile boxes within this category is unknown.
It is not possible to ascertain how many fragile boxes contain electronic products.
(2) Insufficient
Condition One + Condition Two:
Firstly, let's analyze the distribution.
For example,
It is known that the proportion of electronic products in the total is 12/15.
The proportion of fragile items in the total is 10/15.
In other words, as long as the distribution of electronic products within the fragile category exceeds 5/15,
the condition is satisfied.
Let's consider the extreme distributions:
10/15 electronic products within fragile boxes satisfy the distribution.
2/15 electronic products + 3/15 non-electronic products also satisfy the 1/3 distribution of non-fragile items.
10/15 > 5/15 satisfies the condition.
If the non-fragile category has the maximum distribution of electronic products:
5/15 electronic products are in non-fragile boxes.
The remaining 7/15 are distributed within fragile boxes + 3/15 non-electronic products within fragile boxes, which also satisfies the distribution.
7/15 > 5/15 satisfies the condition.
Conditions are sufficient. Answer: C
Only the proportion of fragile boxes, which is 2/3 of the total number of boxes, is known.
No information is available regarding the distribution of electronic products.
It is impossible to determine whether electronic products exceed half of the fragile category.
(1) Insufficient
Condition Two:
The total proportion of boxes containing electronic products is known to be 4/5.
However, the distribution of fragile boxes within this category is unknown.
It is not possible to ascertain how many fragile boxes contain electronic products.
(2) Insufficient
Condition One + Condition Two:
Firstly, let's analyze the distribution.
For example,
It is known that the proportion of electronic products in the total is 12/15.
The proportion of fragile items in the total is 10/15.
In other words, as long as the distribution of electronic products within the fragile category exceeds 5/15,
the condition is satisfied.
Let's consider the extreme distributions:
10/15 electronic products within fragile boxes satisfy the distribution.
2/15 electronic products + 3/15 non-electronic products also satisfy the 1/3 distribution of non-fragile items.
10/15 > 5/15 satisfies the condition.
If the non-fragile category has the maximum distribution of electronic products:
5/15 electronic products are in non-fragile boxes.
The remaining 7/15 are distributed within fragile boxes + 3/15 non-electronic products within fragile boxes, which also satisfies the distribution.
7/15 > 5/15 satisfies the condition.
Conditions are sufficient. Answer: C
07 Jul 2025, 09:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
Assume total boxes to be 150.
Statement 1 - 2/3 of the boxes is Fragile. Therefore, 100 boxes is fragile and 50 boxes non-fragile. There is no information on electronics. Hence, insufficient.
Statement 2 - 4/5 of the boxes contain electronics.
Therefore, 4/5*150 = 120 boxes contain electronics.
Again, insufficient since, we don't know anything about fragile boxes from this statement alone.
When you combine the two statements:
Fragile is 100
Even if all the 30 non-electronic are considered to be part of fragile boxes, fragile electronics = 70 which is more than half.
Hence, C.
Statement 1 - 2/3 of the boxes is Fragile. Therefore, 100 boxes is fragile and 50 boxes non-fragile. There is no information on electronics. Hence, insufficient.
Statement 2 - 4/5 of the boxes contain electronics.
Therefore, 4/5*150 = 120 boxes contain electronics.
Again, insufficient since, we don't know anything about fragile boxes from this statement alone.
When you combine the two statements:
Fragile is 100
Even if all the 30 non-electronic are considered to be part of fragile boxes, fragile electronics = 70 which is more than half.
Hence, C.
07 Jul 2025, 09:26
Kudos
Bookmarks
A department store received a shipment of two types of boxes on Monday: fragile and non-fragile. Did more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics?
Is x > F/2 ?
(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
Since there is no information about shipments containing electronics.
NOT SUFFICIENT
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.
Since there is no information about shipments that are fragile.
NOT SUFFICIENT
(1) + (2)
(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.
x>=0
4/5 - x >= 0; x<=4/5
x - 7/15>=0 ; x>=7/15
2/3-x>=0; x<=2/3
Combing all above,
0<7/15 <= x <= 2/3 < 4/5
F/2 = 1/3
x > 7/15 > 5/15 = 1/3
SUFFICIENT
IMO C
| Fragile | Not fragile | Total | |
| Electronics | x | ||
| Not electronics | |||
| Total | F |
Is x > F/2 ?
(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
| Fragile | Not fragile | Total | |
| Electronics | x | ||
| Not electronics | |||
| Total | 2/3 | 1/3 | 1 |
Since there is no information about shipments containing electronics.
NOT SUFFICIENT
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.
| Fragile | Not fragile | Total | |
| Electronics | x | 4/5 | |
| Not electronics | 1/5 | ||
| Total | 1 |
Since there is no information about shipments that are fragile.
NOT SUFFICIENT
(1) + (2)
(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.
| Fragile | Not fragile | Total | |
| Electronics | x | 1/3 + 7/15 - x = 4/5 - x | 4/5 |
| Not electronics | 2/3-x | 1/5+x-2/3 = x - 7/15 | 1/5 |
| Total | 2/3 | 1/3 | 1 |
x>=0
4/5 - x >= 0; x<=4/5
x - 7/15>=0 ; x>=7/15
2/3-x>=0; x<=2/3
Combing all above,
0<7/15 <= x <= 2/3 < 4/5
F/2 = 1/3
x > 7/15 > 5/15 = 1/3
SUFFICIENT
IMO C
