Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:05 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Rahul_Sharma23
Joined: 05 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
82
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V83 DI83
GPA: 2.5
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V83 DI83
Posts: 114
Kudos: 82
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rahilgaur
Joined: 24 Jun 2024
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
74
 [1]
Given Kudos: 45
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q81 V82 DI72
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q81 V82 DI72
Posts: 103
Kudos: 74
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GarvitGoel
Joined: 06 Aug 2024
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
54
 [1]
Posts: 69
Kudos: 54
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
twinkle2311
Joined: 05 Nov 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
167
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 9.041
Posts: 150
Kudos: 167
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We want to check if more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics

(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
This tells us nothing about electronics. Insufficient.

(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.
This tells us nothing about which boxes are fragile Insufficient.

Both statements:
assume a random number : let's say 30 boxes in total.
Fragile (2/3 * 30) = 20 ; Non-Fragile = 10
Electronics (4/5 * 30) = 24 ; Others = 6
Even if each of the 10 non-fragile boxes contains electronics, we will still have (24 − 10) = 14 fragile boxes with electronics.
Since 14 is more than half of 20, more than half of the fragile boxes must contain electronics. Sufficient.

Answer : C
User avatar
LastHero
Joined: 15 Dec 2024
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
147
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 134
Kudos: 147
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is better to manage numbers than fractions.
lcm of 3 and 5 is 15 boxes.

(1)
10 are fragile.
We don't know the electronics boxes.

Statement is insufficient

(2)
12 are electronics.
We don't know the fragile boxes.

Statement is insufficient

(1)+(2)
10 are fragile.
12 are electronics.

15-12 = 3 aren't electronics.
3 includes the fragile boxes and the non-fragile boxes that aren't electronics.
If all of the 3 are fragile then 10-3=7 are fragile and electronics.
If 2 of the 3 are fragile then 10-2=8 are fragile and electronics.
If 1 of the 3 are fragile then 10-1=9 are fragile and electronics.
If none of the 3 are fragile then 10 are fragile and electronics.

In all the cases (7,8,9 or 10) fragile and electronics boxes are more than half of fragile boxes (5=10/2).

Both statements are sufficient

The right answer is C
User avatar
ODST117
Joined: 15 Aug 2024
Last visit: 29 Oct 2025
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
85
 [1]
Given Kudos: 149
Posts: 173
Kudos: 85
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Given -> There are two types of boxes, fragile (\(f\)) and non fragile (\(nf\))
To determine -> Do more than half the fragile boxes have electronics in them?

Let total boxes = \(x\)

Statement 1 -> Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
This tells us nothing about how many boxes have electronics in them. Insufficient.

Statement 2 -> Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.
This tells us nothing about how many boxes are fragile vs non-fragile. Insufficient.

1+2 -> If \(\frac{2}{3}x\) are fragile boxes and \(\frac{4}{5}x\) are boxes with electronics in them, then the total number of boxes need to be a multiple of the LCM of \(3\) and \(5\), which is \(15\). If it's not, \(\frac{2}{3}x\) and \(\frac{4}{5}x\) might give us decimal values, which is wrong because number of boxes can't be a decimal.
Let \(x=15\)
\(f = \frac{2}{3}(15) = 10\)
\(nf = 15-10 = 5\)

Boxes with electronics (\(e\)) \(= \frac{4}{5}(15) = 12\)
Boxes with non-electronics (\(ne\)) \(= 15-12 = 3\)

To check if more than half of the fragile boxes have electronics, lets try to minimize the number of fragile electronics boxes.
If all \(5\) non-fragile boxes have electronics in them, that would mean the remaining \(7\) electronics boxes have to be fragile. There can't be less than \(7\) fragile electronics boxes because if there were, the remaining electronics boxes will have to be non-fragile, but the maximum number of non-fragile boxes is \(5\).
Therefore, the minimum number of fragile boxes with electronics \(= 7\)
\(7\) is more than half of \(10\).
If the minimum number is more than half, then all other possible values will be more than half.

Statements 1 and 2 together are sufficient.

Answer - C
User avatar
Aishna1034
Joined: 21 Feb 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 218
Own Kudos:
64
 [1]
Given Kudos: 150
Products:
Posts: 218
Kudos: 64
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C.
Using statement 1, 2/3 and 1/3 ..Therefore, fragile is 20, non fragile 10, we dont have any info about electronics. Not sufficient.
Using 2nd we get some info about electronics, but here nothing about fragiles or non fragiles. Not suff.
Using both, if you calculate, always more than half of fragiles will contain electronics, because they are more in no. as compared to non fragiles. Both sufficient.
Bunuel
A department store received a shipment of two types of boxes on Monday: fragile and non-fragile. Did more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics?

(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
adityaprateek15
Joined: 26 May 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
104
 [1]
Given Kudos: 309
Location: India
GPA: 2.7
Products:
Posts: 268
Kudos: 104
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let F be the number of fragile boxes
FE be the number of fragile boxes containing electronics
NF be the number of non-fragile boxes
NFE be the number of non-fragile boxes containing electronics


Ques: Is FE>F/2

Let the total number of boxes = 15

St1:
F = 2/3T = 2/3*15 = 10
NF = 15-10 = 5
No information about FE. Not sufficient.
St2:
E= 4/5T = 12
Others (O) = 15-12 = 3

What we know is E = FE + NFE
FE + NFE = 12
No information about how many FE and NFE boxes are there specifically. Not sufficient.
ST1 and ST2 combined:

Ques: Is FE>F/2

From ST1, we have F=10

So, Q: is FE>5
Set-up a table:


F
NF
E
FE
NFE
12
O
FO
NFO
3
10
5
15


What can be the minimum value of FE?

For that maximize NFE,

Max NFE can be 5 as total NF boxes = 5

Which means FE>=7 since FE+NFE = 12

Therefore, FE>5. Sufficient.

Option C

Bunuel
A department store received a shipment of two types of boxes on Monday: fragile and non-fragile. Did more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics?

(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
AA155
Joined: 18 Apr 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
15
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Products:
Posts: 26
Kudos: 15
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ans (C)

Let the no. of boxes be= x

x= Fragile boxes with electronics + fragile boxes without electronics + non-fragile boxes with electronics + non-fragile boxes without electronics

1 Fragile Box with electronics + Fragile Boxes without electronics = 2/3.x

Fragile Box with electronics = 2/3.x - Fragile Box without electronics ......(i)

Non fragile Box with electronic + Non fragile box without electronics = x/3 .....(ii)

Not sufficient

2 fragile boxes with electronics + 1 non-fragile box with electronic = 4/5 x.

Fragile box with electronic = 4/5.x - Non fragile box with electronic ...(iii)

Not sufficient

1 and 2 together

we can see that (i), (ii) and (iii) are forming a relationship which can be solved to find fragile box with electronics
Bunuel
A department store received a shipment of two types of boxes on Monday: fragile and non-fragile. Did more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics?

(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
jkkamau
Joined: 25 May 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 122
Location: Kenya
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
GPA: 3.5
Products:
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
Posts: 132
Kudos: 107
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Assume total is 90 boxes
S1 F 2/3X60 =60 (No info about which ones have electronics Not sufficient)
S2 4/5X60 = 72 (No info about which ones are fragile not sufficient)
S1+S2
F= 60
NF =30
Electronics = 72
Assume all NF have electronics it means Half of F have electronics but if less than 30 NF have electronics it means more than half of F have electronics hence both are insufficient
ANS E
Bunuel
A department store received a shipment of two types of boxes on Monday: fragile and non-fragile. Did more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics?

(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
eshika23
Joined: 01 Aug 2024
Last visit: 11 Oct 2025
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
34
 [1]
Given Kudos: 65
Posts: 71
Kudos: 34
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Given:
Two types of boxes Fragile and Non Fragile.

Question- Is more than half of fragile boxes contain electronics?

Thinking: Best way to do this is by creating a table.

FragileNon-FragileTotal
Electronic
Not Electronic
Total


Statement1. (1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile, (lets assume total boxes as 15)
So We can fill the table as:

FragileNon-FragileTotal
Electronic
Not Electronic
Total10515

We cant say how many of fragile boxes are electronics so this statement is not sufficient.

Statement (2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.

We can fill the table as:
FragileNon-FragileTotal
Electronic12
Not Electronic3
Total15

Be we can't surely say which are electronic fragile or non fragile.

So this is also not sufficient.

Lets see them Together:

FragileNon-FragileTotal
Electronic12
Not Electronic3
Total10515

Case 1 electronics and non electronic fragile are equal: fragile electronic 5 and not electronic 5 but this is not possible as we cant have more 3 not electronics.

Case 2. Electronic Fragile box is 7 and 3 are Not electronic fragile box , making 0 non-fragile box not electronic and electronic non fragile box as 5 and 5+7=12 so this is possible.

So we can certainly say yes Fragile boxes containing electronics are more than half of total fragile boxes.

Both together are sufficient.



Bunuel
A department store received a shipment of two types of boxes on Monday: fragile and non-fragile. Did more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics?

(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
bebu24
Joined: 19 May 2025
Last visit: 21 Aug 2025
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
35
 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 61
Kudos: 35
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO correct option is C

Statement I:
Fragile: 2/3
Non-Fragile: 1/3
But we have no data about the proportion of electronics. Insufficient.

Statement II:
Electronics : 4/5
But we have no data about the proportion of fragile and non-fragile. Insufficient.

Statement I and Statement II:
Max electronics that can be non-fragile = total non-fragile = 1/3
Min electronics that can be fragile = 4/5 - 1/3 = 7/15

Half of Fragile = 1/3, which is less than 7/15.

So we can definitively conclude that more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics


Bunuel
A department store received a shipment of two types of boxes on Monday: fragile and non-fragile. Did more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics?

(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
UfuomaOh
Joined: 14 Sep 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Products:
Posts: 83
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is a typical 4 category matrix question. There 2 types of boxes: Fragile and non fragile. The question asks are more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics.

Statement 1 tells us that 2/3 of the boxes are fragile. So it means1/3 are non fragile. No information is given about the proportion that are electronics. Hence the information is insufficient.

Statement 2: 4/5 of the boxes contain electronics. We dont have information about the proportion that are fragile so we can get rhe proportion that is both fragile and contain electronics. Statement 2 is insufficient.


Combining statement 1 and 2 gives a four quadrabt that looks like this

Fragile NotFragile

Elect


Not elect


Total elect is 4/5

Total not elect is 1/5

Total fragile is 2/3

Toral non fragile is 1/3

We do not have information about any of the quadrants ie boxes that are non fragile and contain electronics for instance. Thus both statements are insufficient.
User avatar
RedYellow
Joined: 28 Jun 2025
Last visit: 09 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
74
 [1]
Posts: 80
Kudos: 74
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1)
No enough info about electronics

Insufficient

(2)
No enough info about fragile

Insufficient

(1) and (2)

Total boxes = 30

fragile = 20 -> non-fragile = 10
electronics = 24 -> non-electronics = 6

non-electronics = 6 -> maximum number of non-electronics in fragile = 6 -> minimum number of electronics in fragile = 20-6 = 14

minimum number of electronics in fragile = 14 is always greater than fragile/2=10

Sufficient

Correct answer is C
User avatar
Lemniscate
Joined: 28 Jun 2025
Last visit: 09 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
72
 [1]
Posts: 80
Kudos: 72
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1)
Only data about fragile, but not about electronics.

Statement (1) alone is insufficient.

(2)
Only data about electronics, but not about fragile.-

Statement (2) alone is insufficient.

(1)+(2)
If boxes are 15:
fragile boxes = 10
electronics boxes = 12

The questions ask if fragile and electronics boxes are greater than 5=10/2

If electronics boxes = 12 then non electronics boxes = 3
If non electronics boxes = 3 then there are, at most, 3 non electronics boxes in fragile
If then there are, at most, 3 non electronics boxes in fragile then there are, at least, 10-3=7 electronics boxes in fragile

7>5 so the answer is yes

Statement (1) and (2) together are sufficient

Answer C
User avatar
shriwasakshat
Joined: 08 Aug 2024
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 106
Products:
Posts: 85
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lets assume Total boxes = 150

Statement: (1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.

Doesn't tell anything about electronics. Hence, insufficient.

Statement: (2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.

Doesn't tell anything about fragile boxes. Hence, insufficient.

Combine Statement 1 & 2:

According to our assumption

Total boxes = 150

Fragile boxes = 100

Non-fragile boxes = 50

Boxes with electronics = 120

Even if we assign all electronics to all Non-fragile boxes there will still be 70 Boxes with electronics that is more half of Fragile boxes. Hence sufficient. Option C.
User avatar
A_Nishith
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 455
Own Kudos:
199
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 455
Kudos: 199
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Question: Did more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics?

Let:

F = number of fragile boxes

NF = number of non-fragile boxes

E = number of boxes containing electronics

NE = number of boxes not containing electronics

F_E = number of fragile boxes containing electronics

NF_E = number of non-fragile boxes containing electronics

Total boxes = F + NF

We want to determine if F_E > 0.5 * F.

Statement (1): Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
This means F / (F + NF) = 2/3.
So, F = (2/3) * Total boxes.
And NF = (1/3) * Total boxes.
This statement tells us the proportion of fragile boxes, but nothing about electronics.
Therefore, Statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

Statement (2): Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.
This means E / (F + NF) = 4/5.
So, E = (4/5) * Total boxes.
We know that E = F_E + NF_E.
This statement tells us the total proportion of boxes with electronics, but doesn't distinguish between fragile and non-fragile.
Therefore, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Combining Statements (1) and (2):

From (1), F = (2/3) * Total boxes.
From (2), E = (4/5) * Total boxes.

We know that F_E + NF_E = E.
And we also know that F_E <= F (the number of fragile boxes with electronics cannot exceed the total number of fragile boxes).
And NF_E <= NF (the number of non-fragile boxes with electronics cannot exceed the total number of non-fragile boxes).

We want to know if F_E > 0.5 * F.

Let's assume the total number of boxes is 15 (a common multiple of 3 and 5 to make calculations easier).

From (1):
F = (2/3) * 15 = 10 fragile boxes.
NF = (1/3) * 15 = 5 non-fragile boxes.

From (2):
E = (4/5) * 15 = 12 boxes contain electronics.

Now, we need to see how these 12 electronic boxes are distributed between the 10 fragile and 5 non-fragile boxes.

We know F_E + NF_E = 12.

Consider the minimum possible value for F_E.
The maximum number of electronics that can be in non-fragile boxes is 5 (NF_E <= NF).
If NF_E = 5, then F_E = 12 - 5 = 7.
In this case, F_E = 7, and F = 10. Is 7 > 0.5 * 10 (which is 5)? Yes, 7 > 5.

Consider the maximum possible value for F_E.
The maximum number of electronics that can be in fragile boxes is 10 (F_E <= F).
If F_E = 10, then NF_E = 12 - 10 = 2. This is possible since NF is 5, and 2 <= 5.
In this case, F_E = 10, and F = 10. Is 10 > 0.5 * 10 (which is 5)? Yes, 10 > 5.

Let's try to find a scenario where F_E is NOT greater than 0.5 * F.
We need F_E <= 5 (since 0.5 * F = 0.5 * 10 = 5).
If F_E = 5 (or less), then NF_E = 12 - 5 = 7.
But NF (non-fragile boxes) is only 5. So, NF_E cannot be 7. This scenario is impossible.

This implies that F_E must be greater than 5.
Since F_E + NF_E = 12, and NF_E cannot exceed NF (which is 5), the minimum value for F_E is 12 - 5 = 7.
Since F_E (minimum 7) is always greater than 0.5 * F (which is 5), the answer to the question is always "Yes".

Therefore, both statements combined are sufficient.

The final answer is C
User avatar
Rishi705
Joined: 25 Apr 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 44
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Each statement alone is not enough because it does not give us a relationship between the four factors of fragile non fragile electronic or non electronic.

This is a C or E split question.

Let’s take the total number to be 30
Fragile 20
Non fragile 10

Electronic 24
Non elec 6


If FE =15
F non E = 5
Total 20
Non fragile Electronic =9
Non frgile non electronic = 1
Total 10

If FE =16
F non E = 4
Total 20
Non fragile Electronic =8
Non frgile non electronic = 2
Total 10


Can be half or more than half
Both system are not sufficient
Answer is E



Bunuel
A department store received a shipment of two types of boxes on Monday: fragile and non-fragile. Did more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics?

(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
sanya511
Joined: 25 Oct 2024
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
52
 [1]
Given Kudos: 101
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 100
Kudos: 52
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1) Two thirds of the boxes might be fragile but we dont know anything about whether they contain electronics. Not sufficient
(2) four fifths of the boxes contain electronics. If we have 20 boxes, then 16 contain electronics. If there is only one fragile box, then it might be the one not carrying electronics. but if we have 18 fragile boxes, then more than half do contain electronics. So, not sufficient,
(1) + (2) : Say we have 30 boxes. 20 are fragile. and 24 have electronics. even if all 10 of the other non fragile boxes contain electronics, 14 of the fragile boxes contain electronics. So we have our answer.

Option C
Bunuel
A department store received a shipment of two types of boxes on Monday: fragile and non-fragile. Did more than half of the fragile boxes contain electronics?

(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.
(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Mardee
Joined: 22 Nov 2022
Last visit: 16 Oct 2025
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
110
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Products:
Posts: 127
Kudos: 110
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let
total number of boxes = T
total number of fragile boxes = F
total number of fragile boxes with electronics = Ef

We want to find out, if Ef > F/2
Given statements,

(1) Two-thirds of the boxes in the shipment are fragile.

=> F = 2T/3

But we know nothing about how many fragile boxes contain electronics.
So we cannot determine whether more than half of fragile boxes contain electronics

Statement (1) alone is NOT sufficient

(2) Four-fifths of the boxes in the shipment contain electronics.

=> Total electronic boxes = 4T/5

But we don’t know how many fragile boxes contain electronics.
So we cant determine whether more than half of fragile boxes do

Statement (2) alone is NOT sufficient.

Combining statements (1) and (2),
Total electronic boxes = 4T/5
F = 2T/3
=> Non fragile boxes = T - (2T/3) = T/3

Let,
number of fragile boxes with electronics = x
number of non-fragile boxes with electronics =(4T/5) - x

Since, we know that total number of non-fragile boxes = T/3
We can come to the conclusion that,
(4T/5) - x <= T/3

By solving we get,
x >= 7T/15

We know that,
Number of fragile boxes F = 2T/3
Lets check if Ef > F/2 = (1/2)*2T/3 = T/3 = 5T/15
=> Is Ef > 5T/15 ?

x >=7T/15 >= 5T/15

So, yes, more than half the fragile boxes contain electronics

C. Both statements together are sufficient, but neither alone is sufficient
   1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts