Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 02:33 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 02:33
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   4   
655-705 (Hard)|   Weaken|         
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,986
Own Kudos:
5,859
 [2]
Given Kudos: 163
Location: India
Schools: HBS '26 CBS '26 Wharton '26
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: HBS '26 CBS '26 Wharton '26
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,986
Kudos: 5,859
 [2]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 23:58
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is considered a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas.
But opponents point to 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control at 2 existing drone delivery companies operating in major cities.

Conclusion: Since there are no additional safeguards in new drone fleets to prevent such losses of control, accidents will increase if use of drone delivery increases.

Objective: Weaken the argument

Thinking: Is it possible that accidents don't increase despite no additional safeguards in new drone fleets ? Is there any factor which lead to incidents earlier which can be avoided now?

Options analysis:

A. Even if earlier only a small portion of reported incidents resulted in major accidents, the possibility of the same happening in new drone fleets can not be ruled out. Incorrect

B. The argument is not concerned with other methods of package delivery. Incorrect

C. Even if new drone fleets are not introduced, still the possibility of increasing accidents can not be avoided. Incorrect

D. This information was already provided in the argument stating that there are no additional safeguards in new drone fleets. Therefore, they were expected to have the same incident rates as older fleets had. Incorrect

E. Since man-power handling with older drone fleets were not properly trained, it could have lead to high number of incidents. By training of man-power handling drone emergencies, incidents/accidents in new drone fleets can be avoided. Correct

IMO E
User avatar
remdelectus
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2025
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
48
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 58
Kudos: 48
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 00:01
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Advocates say drones are safe for urban delivery but opponents cite 60 incidents of loss of control last two companies. No extra safeguards for new designs.
A. Reduces severity but doesn't weaken prediction about prevalence of accidents.
B. The argument is about drones not comparison.
C. The arguments concerns accidents not fleet size.
D. Suggests design changes don't help.
E. This implies incidents were due to poor training, not inherent design flaw. Accidents may not increase even if drone use grows
User avatar
officiisestyad
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2025
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
37
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Real Estate
GMAT Focus 1: 515 Q78 V79 DI70
GMAT 1: 510 Q50 V47
GPA: 10
WE:Other (Other)
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
GMAT Focus 1: 515 Q78 V79 DI70
GMAT 1: 510 Q50 V47
Posts: 44
Kudos: 37
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 00:01
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Choice (E)
It provides alternate cause of the incident to occur: inadequate operator training and the fault is not from drone design
User avatar
adityamntr
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2023
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
81
 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Booth '27 Fuqua '27 Kellog '27
Schools: Booth '27 Fuqua '27 Kellog '27
Posts: 111
Kudos: 81
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 00:30
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more

A) the arguement is about number of accdients, not severity. ( hence not relevant)
B) comparsion to the othr way of delivry is irrelavnt to the arguement
c)size of the drones are ont affectng the arguement
d)this strenghten the arguement saying the frequency is same, then if more delivry happens more accident will occour
e) this weakens the arument by giving an alternative explaination of why drone acciednt happened.

answer is e
User avatar
Dereno
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,398
Own Kudos:
1,374
 [1]
Given Kudos: 425
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Posts: 1,398
Kudos: 1,374
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 01:14
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
The passage speaks about drones - specifically, autonomous delivery drones.

Proponents : These drones can be effective in urban areas. Because, urban areas are usually crowded, and delivery takes a longer time, moreover the package is delivered safely.

Opponents: They cite 60 incidents which took place last year at few major cities, where the drones lost control UNEXPECTEDLY. These drones were operated by 2 major drone companies.

Since, The proposed new drone fleet designs, include no additional safeguards to prevent such unexpected accidents.

They conclude accidents will increase , as delivery drones usage also increases.

IF Delivery Drones INCREASES —————-> Accidents INCREASES.

We need to find a seriously weakening option from the following, this gives us a clue that there is another weakening statement of lesser intent.

A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.

This option speaks about the reported accident incidents, out of which 60 incidents even though a smaller fraction has resulted in damage or loss of property. Here are few things to be aware of. Firstly, if 60 is a small fraction of reported incidents, then the number of reported incidents should be a greater figure. Secondly, the number of unreported incidents, which can be any number. Just considering the reported incidents figure, we can say the accidents are high.

This option speaks on the severity of incidents, while the actual debate is around the number of accidents. Hence, Wrong.

B) Other methods of package delivery ,such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident prone than drone delivery.

This option shifts its focus to other methods of delivery, while the actual debate revolves around automated drone delivery and the accidents while using it. This is a diversion tactics used by people to evade the problem, and increasing the scope of issue to dilute it. Hence, wrong.

C) The current fleets at existing drone delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need of new drones.

The issue is not between new drones vs old drones - which has caused more accidents and damage. As earlier instances of accidents has occured, the trend that incorporating new drones might increase the number of accidents. This option speaks on capacity handling, which is irrelevant. Hence, wrong.

D) The frequency of unexpected loss of control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency of older fleets.

If the frequency of accidents hasn’t changed, then there is a fundamental flaw in the system or design of operation. With more fleets being added to the arsenal, we might expect the accident figures to shoot up. Hence, it strengthens the conclusion.

E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

This option explains the cause of accidents - as many people operating the drones have received lesser training, this could have resulted in unexpected loss of control , eventually leading to injuries. As the training phase, might help them learn a bit more of how effective can the drones be handled, we might expect the accident rates to fall.

That doesn’t mean, adding more drones will lead to more accidents. May be the new drones might have an improved version of combat the issue of unexpected loss of control. Hence, a weakener. As it’s not the drones which are faulty, but the person who is handling it.

Option E
User avatar
jkkamau
User avatar
Joined: 25 May 2020
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 226
Own Kudos:
190
 [1]
Given Kudos: 142
Location: Kenya
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
GPA: 3.5
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
Posts: 226
Kudos: 190
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 02:34
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. We do not know if the fraction will increase as more drones become involved hence incorrect
B. This is out of scope because it talks about other methods instead weakening drone use
C. Even if that is the case, it does not resolve the losses challenge at hand
D. This only serves to confirm that the losses will increase at the same rate
E Correct choice. Although we have to assume that the companies have retrained the staff to reduce the losses
Ans E*
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
User avatar
Lizaza
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2021
Last visit: 29 Mar 2026
Posts: 240
Own Kudos:
282
Given Kudos: 7
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Posts: 240
Kudos: 282
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 02:59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm really not sure if I'm getting this right, but what bothers me is that evidence provides the number of incidents, whereas the conclusion speaks about increase in accidents. I feel like there's an unexplained conflation of terms, and I'd look for something in the answers that really calls it out.

A) Perhaps this is our option, since it draws this line between incidents and accidents. Like, there were losses of control, yes, but it's not like they had any impact, so where would all these 'accidents' come from?

B) We're not saying drones are better that other things, so other alternatives are irrelevant.

C) This doesn't change anything, because the current drones are as faulty as the potential new ones.

D) This is a strengthener, since it only underlines the fact that no improvements are taking place.

E) While this sounds like a weakener, since the loss of control had a human factor and is therefore not a widescale issue, we have no information whether other operators in the future will get more profound training, which means it doesn't really show anything about the future concerns.

Therefore, the right answer is A.
User avatar
asperioresfacere
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2025
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 106
Posts: 61
Kudos: 53
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 03:41
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Evidence : 60 loss of control incidents last year at 2 drone companies.
Claim : New Drone fleets have no extra safeguards.
Conclusion: If Drone delivery use increases - accidents will become prevalent.

Key assumption: The accidents are mainly due to drone technology , so scaling up drones = more accidents.

A : Only a small fraction caused : accidents still occurred , This is talking about severity.❌
B: Comparison to Bicycles are irrelevant.❌
C: Existing Fleets can handle increased volume without new drones . Accidents could still increase with more flights.❌
D: New flights have similar incident rates as older flights - supports the concern.❌
E : Loss of control may be due to human training failures not drone design , Directly attacks the assumption.✅
User avatar
gchandana
User avatar
Joined: 16 May 2024
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 193
Own Kudos:
142
 [1]
Given Kudos: 170
Location: India
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 193
Kudos: 142
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 03:53
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
See, here PoE helps a lot.

A. This is talking about the effect of the accidents, which is not the focus here. The focus is on the increase in accidents.
B. Sure, but note here, the conclusion has a condition. It says that if the use of drone delivery increases, then this is not relevant.
C. We are worried about how the companies will handle the increased use of drones.
D. This infact strengthens by indicating that there would be an increase in the accidents if the use increases.
E. We are only left with E, and it doesn't do a great job, but still better compared to the other choices. It weakens by pointing out by saying that there wouldn't be necesarrily be an increase, because those reported were at the companies that operated them had minimal training. So this doesn't necessarily have to be the case for all companies, which doesn't indicate there would be an increase in the accidents.

Option E.
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
User avatar
JiriNovacek
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 07 Feb 2026
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
9
 [1]
Posts: 17
Kudos: 9
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 04:00
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E) is correct, since the loss of control at the two companies that reported was due to human failure. Therefore, it is not true that more drons will necessarily lead to more accidents. So this answer weakens most the argument.
User avatar
Sujithz001
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2024
Last visit: 06 Feb 2026
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
46
 [1]
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 101
Kudos: 46
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 04:36
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Weaken the argument:

Conclusion: Number of incidents will only become more, if drone delivery is increased.

Premise: New drone fleets haven't been done any safeguard upgrades.

Assumption (Holding link): This time number of deliveries must have increased than previously.

Answer: E

Reason: Last time when the incidents happened, there were only minimal training given on handling errors. So hopefully, now the training should have been done more than last time.

Not the answer & reason:

C - Ability to handle operations with the current fleet itself, doesn't guarantee me any reduction in errors.
User avatar
Reon
User avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2025
Last visit: 28 Mar 2026
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
121
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 134
Kudos: 121
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 04:59
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(The argument is not about what damage or injury they causes. It doesn't weaken the argument) Wrong

(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(Making this comparison is irrelevant to the argument) Wrong

(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(It does not explain why accidents would increase, only about capacity) Wrong

(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(Comparison of old fleets and the new fleets only proves that safety isn't improved, it only strengths the argument) Wrong

(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.
(This explains the incidents happened because of poor training. If the training improves, the accidents might decrease. It weakens the argument) Correct
User avatar
prepapr
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2025
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
82
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q85 V80 DI77
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q85 V80 DI77
Posts: 92
Kudos: 82
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 05:06
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Context: Autonomous delivery drones are advocated as safe to transport packages in urban areas. But opponents point to the 60 incidents reported last year at two existing drone delivery companies.
Premise: Designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such loss of control
Conclusion: Accidents will increase if drone delivery increases
Logical gap: Accidents happened last year is used to predict that current drone system will also encounter proportionate number of accidents

Evaluating options

A) This does not help us. Even if it is a small fraction, if the same fraction of accidents are involved in future also, accidents will increase proportionately
B) This is irrelevant. The conclusion is about new drones deliveries leading to loss of control
C) This is not our concern. Even if the current fleet is capable of handling workload, this does not tell us anything about reducing the number of accidents
D) This is a strengthener. If same frequency is expected, greater the number of drones, greater the number of accidnets
E) This is a weakener. This brings in another reason for the accidents which is human negligence. If this factor is solved, we will not be having increased number of accidents for increased drone deliveries.
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
User avatar
msignatius
User avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2025
Last visit: 09 Apr 2026
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
98
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: ISB '27 NUS '26 INSEAD Jan '26 (S) IESE '26 (D) HEC (S) IMD ESADE'26 Judge '26 LBS '27
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q86 V85 DI84
GPA: 3.5
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: ISB '27 NUS '26 INSEAD Jan '26 (S) IESE '26 (D) HEC (S) IMD ESADE'26 Judge '26 LBS '27
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q86 V85 DI84
Posts: 131
Kudos: 98
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 05:24
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We're face-to-face with a logical fallacy in the conclusion presented in the stem: "since no one's working to make drones safer, with an increase in the use of package delivery via drones, there will be an increase in 'loss of control' of the mechanical bird."

Why is this being assumed? Because of two instances at existing drone-delivery companies. But isn't this assumption too much a stretch / generalization? What if these were one-off cases because of reasons that may not "fly" once the numbers increase?

Let's figure with the options -

A. We're not concerned with whether the drone caused damage or not, we're only concerned with 'loss of control'. Eliminate.

B. This isn't an argument of drone delivery vs other mode of delivery, this is an argument on whether an increase in drone use will lead to an increase in the instances in which there was a loss of control, or not. Eliminate.

C. Well, this may make sense if we assume that for 'loss of control' to become more prevalent, we need drone use to increase in the first place, which this option states may not occur as the utilization of drones improves; but here, we're shifting the subject matter away from what the argument says - that "loss of control will become more prevalent if THE USE of drone delivery increases". This could also imply that handling higher delivery volume equates to an increase in drone use. Eliminate, but close.

D. This is irrelevant, mainly because we aren't comparing old and new fleets of drones.

E. The answer! This reveals externalities / controllables that caused the loss of control, which can be easily bridged with proper training, that is also likely to be instituted as drones become standard.


Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
User avatar
forestmayank
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2025
Last visit: 31 Mar 2026
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
87
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 103
Kudos: 87
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 05:37
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A - Even if small fraction resulted in property damage or injury does not mean that future accidents would not cause more damage. This does not weaken the argument, hence no
B - Comparison with other system of courier delivery does not address the concern over drone delivery. The statement is irrelevant, hence no
C - Even if same number of drones are operated does not mean that accidents won't happen. Does not address the concern or refute it, hence no
D - No decrease in loss control will result in similar chances of accidents which supports the statement not weaken it, hence no
E - If the operator was not properly trained to handle accident prone situation, more training could result in solving the issue even with the same safety standards in new drones. This weakens the claim.

Answer Option E
User avatar
crimson_king
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2023
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 152
Own Kudos:
156
 [1]
Given Kudos: 113
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 152
Kudos: 156
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 05:44
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
On analyzing the options one by one,

A: Fewer injuries or damage doesn’t show losses of control won’t increase → does not weaken the prediction about prevalence. Eliminate

B: Comparison with bicycle couriers is irrelevant to whether drone accidents will increase → does not weaken. Eliminate

C: Says no new drones are needed, but doesn’t address why losses of control occurred → does not weaken. Eliminate

D: Same loss-of-control frequency across fleets supports the idea that the problem persists → strengthens, not weakens. Eliminate

E If many incidents were due to poor operator training, then losses of control may be fixable without new safeguards → weakens the claim that accidents will inevitably increase. Keep

The correct answer is option E
User avatar
ledzep10
User avatar
Joined: 13 May 2025
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
59
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V81 DI78
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V81 DI78
Posts: 104
Kudos: 59
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 06:11
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MC: Since there are no additional safety features, accidents will increase if drone delivery increases.

A. Even if a small fraction leads to accidents, since the total number of drones increases, the absolute value of accidents will increase. Therefore it does not weaken the conclusion.

B. We are not comparing drone delivery with other forms of delivery. Out of scope.

C. The fact is already considering a new drone fleet, so whether the requirement of a new fleet is required or not is not our concern.

D. Even if the frequency of unexpected loss-of-control remains the same between new and old fleets, the absolute value of accidents will increase with the increase in number of drones.

E. This option tells us that the real reason for the accidents are because after the failure of the automated systems, drone operators were inexperienced in controlling the drones. Therefore this gives us an alternate explanation as to why the accidents occurred and weakens the conclusion.
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
User avatar
redandme21
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 05 Jan 2026
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
87
 [1]
Posts: 97
Kudos: 87
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 06:17
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To weaken the argument, we need to show that the reported incidents could be explained by factors other than design. Factors that could be corrected even without new safeguards.

A It minimizes the severity of incidents but does not undermine the claim that accidents will increase.

B It compares drones to other delivery methods, but this does not address whether drone accidents will increase.

C It concerns fleet capacity, not accident causation.

D It suggests incidents are persistent across fleets, which does not weaken the conclusion.

E Correct. It attributes many incidents to inadequate operator training, not to drone design. If losses of control were largely due to poor human intervention, then increasing drone use with better training could avoid a rise in accidents.


IMO E
User avatar
SafSin28
User avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2022
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
67
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 84
Kudos: 67
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 06:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. ---> Background info.

But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. ---> A premise

Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control,---> A second premise

Accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.----> Conclusion

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?----> QS: Weaken

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.---> this one is about the past while conclusion is about future. So OUT.

(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.----> off context. OUT

(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.----> this shows no need to increase the number of drones for future usage. So conclusion weakens. Keep it now.

(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.---> This is about the current reports and still lacks the future. OUT.

(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.---> A reason why the incidents happend. But this doesn't weaken the conclusion. OUT
User avatar
sanjitscorps18
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2019
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 723
Own Kudos:
742
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Location: India
Schools: IMD'26
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: IMD'26
Posts: 723
Kudos: 742
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 18 Dec 2025, 06:44
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A -> Even if there is small percentage, the overall numbers may rise with additional usage. Supports the argument
B -> Comparison with other methods doesn't weaken the argument.
C -> This does not offset increased usage. Hence doesn't weaken
D -> This strengthens the argument
E -> This weakens the argument by suggesting that accidents may not continue even if drone design and drone related safeguards have not been put in place. Safeguards outside of drone's functioning can also prevent accidents.

Option E
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
504 posts
bhanu29
358 posts