Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 09:09 It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 09:09
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   4   
655-705 (Hard)|   Weaken|         
User avatar
flippedeclipse
User avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2025
Last visit: 14 Aug 2026
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 39
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Posts: 105
Kudos: 73
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 13:28
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more

Going through sentence by sentence what the argument is saying:
S1: Drones are a safe way to deliver packages.
S2: But they're not safe, because 60 accidents happened at 2 companies.
S3: Conclusion - New drones aren't going to have better safeguards, thus accidents are going to be more prevalent (note the use of prevalent and not frequent here. Frequency can equal prevalence, but prevalence means widespread, versus frequency which means "more often").

Looking to weaken the argument, so lets see what truly breaks the argument's logic.

Option A: It's not about how much damage was done, it's about the accidents happening at all. Irrelevant, eliminate.
Option B: Bikes having more accidents doesn't have anything to do with drones having accidents. Irrelevant, eliminate.
Option C: The fleets won't buy new drones because they have enough. The new drones don't have upgraded safety features, so model of drone doesn't matter. Irrelevant, eliminate.
Option D: Basically, this says that the percentage of accidents is the same for new and old fleets. This is tempting, but the argument we're trying to break is that accidents are going to be more prevalent. There's some logic to it, but it doesn't cleanly break the argument.
Option E: This is a solid way to break the argument. It essentially says that it's not the equipment that's the problem, it's the operators, so this is a localized and specific problem for these two companies and not an overall problem for the equipment. More drone deliveries will not equal more prevalent accidents.

Therefore Option E is the answer.
User avatar
canopyinthecity
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2025
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 159
Own Kudos:
106
 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 159
Kudos: 106
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 13:28
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Main Point: Increase in accidents if use of drone delivery increases
Basis: (1) 60 accidents in the past (2) No additional safeguard in proposed new drone
Logic: Accidents have occurred in the past. It is likely due to safeguard issue in drone design. And since that has not changed, the accidents will increase.

(A), (B), (C) - Irrelevant.
(D) - tempting but it only shows that accident rate will be stable in both new and old fleets. It doesn't challenge the assumption that more drones = more accidents
(E) - Weakens the logic. As this options tells that accidents are likely due to training issue and not due to drone design. So if training is provided, accidents might not increase.

(E) is the answer
User avatar
chasing725
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2025
Last visit: 16 Aug 2026
Posts: 241
Own Kudos:
235
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States (OR)
Schools: Stanford
Schools: Stanford
Posts: 241
Kudos: 235
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 13:50
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more

Conclusion: The number of drone accidents will increase as there are no additional safeguards.

A. Incorrect and Irrelevant. We are not debating if the drone results in damage or not. The conclusion states that the accidents will increase.

B. Incorrect : We are only concerend about drone delivery. Any comparision is not relevant to the conclusion.

C. Incorrect : Doesn't imapct our conclusion. The icnrease in delviery can be met using existing drones and accidents can still increase. Out of scope. Eliminate.

D. Incorrect : Strengthens the conclusion. Eliminate.

E. Correct : This tells us a reason on why the drones encountered accidents. Now if the operators are trained the accidents will reduce.

Option E
avatar
Akshat_verma_25
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2024
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
80
 [1]
Given Kudos: 62
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 68
Kudos: 80
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 13:55
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is my reasoning
Cause - design doesn’t include additional safeguard to prevent loss of control
Effect - 60 drones losses control

Assumption - designs are the reason for loss of control

E tells us that no design is not the reason, real reason is the operator lack of training.
User avatar
Vamikaaa
User avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2025
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
13
Given Kudos: 14
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Posts: 23
Kudos: 13
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 14:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer = B

Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.
Argument = bold italics

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
Unrelated to argument, doesn't matter if property damage or injury

(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
If other methods have same or more proneness to accident, then drone delivery might not be the reason for increase in accidents, hence weakens the argument.

(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
Irrelevant to argument, capability of existing drones is not relevant

(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
Neither strengthens nor weakens

(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.
No mention that trainings would be increased, hence doesn't weaken the argument

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
vasu1104
User avatar
Joined: 10 Feb 2023
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 731
Own Kudos:
422
 [1]
Given Kudos: 672
Location: Canada
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 731
Kudos: 422
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 15:07
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
conclusion= accidents will be more common if use of drone delivery increases.
reason= new design doesnt have additional safeguards to prevent loss of control
60 incidents in 2 major companies.

A,B,C are irrelevant / out of scope
D strengthen it rather
E clearly weaknes it. it was operators mistake and not design problem

Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
User avatar
KunchiGoks
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2025
Last visit: 15 Jun 2026
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 20
Kudos: 20
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 16:10
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer choice: (E)

Conclusion: The argument concludes that accidents involving unexpected loss of control will become more prevalent as drone delivery increases.

Key assumption: Reported incidents must be caused by something inherent to the drones themselves, such as their design and therefore would scale as drone usage increases.

Weaken strategy: Identify an alternative explanation for the incidents that is not inherent to the drones and therefore would not necessarily carry forward as drone delivery expands.

Why (E): It introduces lack of training as an alternative explanation for the reported incidents. Since inadequate operator training is not inherent to the drones themselves, improving training could reduce such incidents. Therefore, increased drone use would not necessarily lead to more accidents, which weakens the argument.

Why not the others:
(A) Focuses on the severity of incidents rather than their prevalence.
(B) Introduces a comparison with other delivery methods, which is not relevant to the argument.
(C) Suggests few drones may be needed, but does not address the cause of the incidents.
(D) Suggests no increase in frequency but still does not explain why the original incidents occurred.
User avatar
bhanu29
User avatar
GMAT Forum Director
Joined: 02 Oct 2024
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 819
Own Kudos:
498
 [1]
Given Kudos: 746
Location: India
Schools: Anderson '27 Booth '27 Foster '27 Haas '27 Ross '27 Tepper '27 Stanford '27 CBS '27 NYU Stern Johnson (Cornell) McCombs '27 Kellogg '27 Sloan '27
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V85 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 715 Q87 V84 DI86
GPA: 9.11
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Products:
My Reviews GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Schools: Anderson '27 Booth '27 Foster '27 Haas '27 Ross '27 Tepper '27 Stanford '27 CBS '27 NYU Stern Johnson (Cornell) McCombs '27 Kellogg '27 Sloan '27
GMAT Focus 2: 715 Q87 V84 DI86
Posts: 819
Kudos: 498
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 18:44
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
Premises:
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas.
But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities.
Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control,

Conclusion:
accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

This is a weakening question, and here the passage assumes the loss of control in autonomous drones is because of machine design not having any safeguards, if we could weaken this claim, we can easily solve this question.

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
We are not bothered with consequences of the incidents, this is clearly not a weakener. Eliminate.

(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
Doesn't matter even if the other courier were better, the argument is about absence of safeguards in drone design causing incidents. Eliminate.

(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
We are not bothered about handling about drones, conclusion is about safeguards in drone design responsible for incidents. Eliminate.

(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
Even if it's same as old feet the incidents still happen and we still might need safeguards. Eliminate.

(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.
This gives us an alternate reason for malfunctioning, drone operators having minimal training on how to intervene during a malfunction, so it may not be a design flaw. Keep.

Correct Answer: E
User avatar
ghimires28
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2025
Last visit: 19 Aug 2026
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
18
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Nepal
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Posts: 27
Kudos: 18
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 18:45
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question says:
Auto Drone delivery System(ADDS) is safe, otpponests of drone delivery say no , stating that last year there were 60 incident involving ADDS in two company in major state,
They conclude they as new design dont prevent them it is not safe them to use ADDS in large scale and numbers will incraese in large scale
We need to say no despite n change it design the number will not increase and ADDS is safe
A)strengthen(out)
B)others vs ADDS don't care(Out of scope)
C)can meet the goal, (out of Scope)
D)old vs new (have to take new assumption to make it true so out)
E) E says its not that the design was bad but there were not trained so nothing to do with design.Therefore E is the weakener.
User avatar
HarishChaitanya
User avatar
Joined: 05 Feb 2024
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
21
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Schools: ISB '27 IIM IIM IIM
Schools: ISB '27 IIM IIM IIM
Posts: 56
Kudos: 21
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 20:43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In order to weaken the argument.
Let us the argument is if don't delivery increases, it is said that accidents will also be more because of the incidents that's occurred for the current rate of drone deliveries happening

The counter should be to prove other methods aren't any sophisticated or less accident rate than drone which is mentioned by option b that bicycle or other modes of delivery aren't any safe than drone deliveries

Therefore option b is the answer


Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
User avatar
sriharsha4444
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2018
Last visit: 05 Mar 2026
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
85
 [1]
Given Kudos: 803
Posts: 125
Kudos: 85
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 20:51
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise:
Some issues occurred with previous drones. No new changes are made to the drone.

Conclusion:
Drone accidents will only increase

Gap:
What if something else changed?
- like the weather is now more conducive
- or the pilots got better training
- The mapping system has gotten better
- now better signaling system is present


A. no impact. How bad is the damage is not the point of argument.
B. no impact. Comparing other methods of delivery to measure how safe drone delivery is is useless for the argument
C. no impact. But no additional measures were taken to guard against the issues.
D. Strengthener. If the frequency is same, then the author's point the it will only increase is a bit amplified.
E. Correct. If it is due to pilots not getting proper training, then even without any changes to the drones, we can expect a decline in accidents.
User avatar
rickyric395
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2020
Last visit: 14 Aug 2026
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
112
 [1]
Given Kudos: 68
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 122
Kudos: 112
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 21:08
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
It could be derieved from argument that, there are shortcoming in the build of drones that has caused the delay. Cause the argument says that since there are no additional safeguard added in new drone design, accidents will rise. Meaning if safeguards would have been added, then accidents might not have added.
There is a clear relation between build of drone and accidents.
So any option that tells that accidents were not because of build but for some other reason will be the answer.
Option E -> it says it was minimal training that could have caused the accident, not the build of drone. It weakens reasoning given in argument.
User avatar
SwethaReddyL
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2023
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 186
Own Kudos:
37
 [1]
Given Kudos: 271
Location: India
Posts: 186
Kudos: 37
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 21:11
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion - Accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases
Line of reasoning - the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported last year

We have to weaken the conclusion; we can say the accident is not because of the drone fault but because of something else
Option A - talks about only small fraction of incidents result in damage - damage is still damage, eliminate it
Option B - comparing bicycle to drones is out of the scope - eliminate it
Option C - doesn't talk about damage - eliminate
Option D - frequency of loss is same as the older fleets, okay? how does it help us? - eliminate it
Option E - gotcha! clearly says the fault is of drone operators as they had only minimal training

Our answer is Option E
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
User avatar
rutikaoqw
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2025
Last visit: 30 Aug 2026
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
Schools: ISB '27 IIM
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q84 V82 DI72
GPA: 9.28
Schools: ISB '27 IIM
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q84 V82 DI72
Posts: 34
Kudos: 17
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 21:21
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A: Even if it was a small fraction, if the drone delivery increases, the NUMBER of mishaps increase. NOt the asnwer
B: OOS
C: Similar to A. Even if I am using the same drone, if the number of deliveries go up, the fraction remains same and the number of accidents that are drone prone go up.
D: Again from the same family as A and C.
E: This tells that it was not the drone but the untrained users that led to accidents. This will lead to number go down if they are trained. Weakens. Answer.
User avatar
obedear
User avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2024
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
72
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 99
Kudos: 72
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 21:26
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I believe E is the best answer.

The claim of the argument is that if drone deliveries increase, loss of control incidents will also increase. We need something that breaks this direct relationship.

A - Does not address the nature of the direct relationship, merely tries to mitigate the magnitude of the damage of the incidents, irrelevant
B - We are only concerned with whether drone deliveries will continue to cause these accidents, not about other methods of delivery
C - The argument is not saying that an increase in the number of drones used will cause more accidents, its simply saying that increased deliveries made will cause more accidents, so the fact that existing drone infrastructure can handle expected demand is not relevant
D - This says that the frequency / likelihood of accidents is neither improving nor getting worse based on new drone technology. It does not opine on whether accidents will become more prevalent.
E - If the two companies' drone operators had minimal training, this paints the picture that the incidents might not be indicative of a larger pattern and the initially identified direct relationship might not hold if proper training were to be implemented. Correct.
User avatar
AbhishekP220108
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2024
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 705
Own Kudos:
818
 [1]
Given Kudos: 207
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
GMAT Focus 2: 595 Q84 V78 DI77
Products:
My Reviews Forum Quiz
GMAT Focus 2: 595 Q84 V78 DI77
Posts: 705
Kudos: 818
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 21:33
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I will go for E.

Let's look at the line of reasoning by the author.

Evidence- loss of control incidents reported at two companies, and the new proposed drones did not have any safeguards to prevent such incidents

Conclusion- If the delivery from drones increases, there will be an increase in incidents.

The question asks to weaken the argument.

Prethinking: The author thinks that the incidents happened because the existing safeguards were not sufficient, or there were no safeguards in the drones. He assumes that only adding the safeguards will prevent the incidents from increasing.

So if we prove that the author's thinking is wrong with some other reasons, then that will be our weakner.

Option E gives us the reason that the incidents happened because the operators were not trained enough.

Now, why are other options incorrect:

A. This gives extra info about the incidents that happened, but it didn't provide us with any reason to doubt the conclusion. Not relevant
B. Unnecessary comparison between entities.
C. This states that drones are not needed, which means the old drones will transport the package. So, what we still cannot question the conclusion
D. New vs Old fleet of drones and frequency of both fleets are the same, and if the number of drones increases, the incidents increase. Hence, it strengthens rather than weakens.


Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
User avatar
GmatTest2026
User avatar
Joined: 30 Jul 2019
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,634
Own Kudos:
812
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3,936
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Economics
Schools: Duke '27
GPA: 3
WE:Human Resources (Real Estate)
Schools: Duke '27
Posts: 1,634
Kudos: 812
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 21:41
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
Solution:

1. It only talks about the a small fraction of the reported incidents due to loss of control whereas the passage states about increase in accidents due to use of drone diivery. So, Incorrect.

2. This choice only comparison between incidents reported such as the couriers delivered by bicycle and drone delivery. So, Incorrect.

3. It talks about the existing drone delivery companies are good enough to handle increased delivery volume then new drone company. So, Incorrect.

4. This choice only discusses about the loss by the newly as well as the older fleets. So, Incorrect.

5. This choice weakens the conclusion as it states that the drone accidents occured due to minimal training provided to the drone operators on how to handle when automated systems malfunctioned. So, this the correct one.
User avatar
arnab24
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2024
Last visit: 16 Aug 2026
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
81
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
Schools: ISB '26
GPA: 8.80
Schools: ISB '26
Posts: 96
Kudos: 81
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 22:26
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The main conclusion of the argument is "Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control , accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases". From here we are getting one key assumption : argument is pointing towards design mis handling failure as cause towards these accidents. We need to weaken the argument. If we look at option E carefully it points towards human mishandling since it says that operators didn't get enough training to operate the drones. This create a sense of doubt in the boardroom for this possibility. Other options are not attacking the assumption. So clearly E is the answer.
Bunuel
Increased use of autonomous delivery drones is sometimes advocated as a safe way to transport packages in crowded urban areas. But opponents of drone delivery point to the 60 incidents involving unexpected loss of control that were reported just last year at two existing drone-delivery companies operating in major cities. Since designs for proposed new drone fleets include no additional safeguards to prevent such losses of control, accidents will only become more prevalent if use of drone delivery increases.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In only a small fraction of the reported incidents did a drone’s loss of control result in property damage or injury.
(B) Other methods of package delivery, such as bicycle couriers, have not been proven less accident-prone than drone delivery.
(C) The current fleets at existing drone-delivery companies are large enough to handle increased delivery volume without any need for new drones.
(D) The frequency of unexpected loss-of-control reports in newly launched drone fleets is about the same as the frequency in older fleets.
(E) At the two companies where losses of control were reported, many drone operators had received only minimal training on how to intervene when automated systems malfunctioned.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Show more
User avatar
AditiDeokar
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2025
Last visit: 21 May 2026
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
22
 [2]
Given Kudos: 298
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: NUS ESSEC MiM '26 ESSEC MiF '26 INSEAD MiM '26 ESADE Imperial ISB '26 ESADE HEC Sept '26 IE INSEAD Jan '26
GMAT Focus 1: 525 Q77 V77 DI74
GPA: 3.5
Schools: NUS ESSEC MiM '26 ESSEC MiF '26 INSEAD MiM '26 ESADE Imperial ISB '26 ESADE HEC Sept '26 IE INSEAD Jan '26
GMAT Focus 1: 525 Q77 V77 DI74
Posts: 86
Kudos: 22
 [2]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 23:48
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer is E. What is true for the two existing drone companies might not necessarily be true for all. A, B, C is irrelevant, even if a small fraction of damage is reported on property damage, there is still damage and it doesn't help weaken the claim that accidents will become more prevalent with the increased use of drones, similarly comparing drones to bicyles doesn't help weaken the claim. We are not concerned with increased delivery volume hence C is out. D just strengthens the claim that more accidents can occur with the same design due t the matched frequencies. E bring isn another factor showing that it is not necessarily the design but faulty training of operators causing the accident, hence E is correct.
User avatar
Saks116
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2022
Last visit: 14 Aug 2026
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
Posts: 48
Kudos: 26
 [1]
12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 3: Increased use of 17 Dec 2025, 23:52
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E
Highlighths the other cause which resulted in the loss of control but not the design.
Hence training would be required to handle malfunction,not deisgn improvement.
with the proper training incidents can be curbed
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
AbhishekP220108
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts