Several environmental advocacy groups claim to represent the interests of rural farming communities affected by climate change. Yet, many of these organizations are primarily staffed and funded by individuals from urban areas, with little direct experience in agriculture. This has led some critics to question whether these groups truly reflect the priorities of the communities they aim to support. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the criticism raised about the advocacy groups? A. Rural farmers often prioritize short-term economic survival over long-term environmental initiatives proposed by government agencies. B. Some of the most vocal opponents of environmental advocacy groups are also those who have historically resisted regulatory oversight of farming practices. C. Advocacy groups led by individuals without direct exposure to the affected communities often lack a nuanced understanding of local challenges. D. Urban-based environmental organizations typically rely on policy advisors with academic expertise in climate science and sustainability. E. Farming communities are often hesitant to engage with organizations they perceive as outsiders, regardless of the groups’ stated intentions. V40-27

Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 00:41

It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 00:41

Toolkit

Critical Reasoning (CR)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Apr 16
Sneak Peek: $200 Off GMAT Prep
12:00 PM EDT
-
11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 26
Score High on the GMAT with Target Test Prep
10:00 AM EDT
-
11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 27
Try OnDemand GMAT Masterclass
11:00 AM EDT
-
12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 28
Join - GMAT Day!
08:00 AM PDT
-
11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition 2025 - Day 10: Several

1 2 3

gchandana

Joined: 16 May 2024

Last visit: 21 Apr 2026

Posts: 191

Own Kudos:

139

[1]

Given Kudos: 170

Location: India

Products:

Posts: 191

Kudos: 139

[1]

27 Dec 2025, 01:35

Kudos

Bookmarks

Note, we have to strengthen the critics' point.

A. This talks about advocacy groups in general; we are talking about those with staff from urban areas.
B. This is not relevant here.
C. Yes, this shows why the critics' questioning makes sense.
D. This would support the advocacy group's point of view, not the critics'.
E. Sure, but the critics question if the groups reflect the needs of the communities they represent. This says that, regardless of the group's intention, the intention itself is in question here.

Option C.

Bunuel

Several environmental advocacy groups claim to represent the interests of rural farming communities affected by climate change. Yet, many of these organizations are primarily staffed and funded by individuals from urban areas, with little direct experience in agriculture. This has led some critics to question whether these groups truly reflect the priorities of the communities they aim to support.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the criticism raised about the advocacy groups?

A. Rural farmers often prioritize short-term economic survival over long-term environmental initiatives proposed by advocacy groups.

B. Some of the most vocal opponents of environmental advocacy groups are also those who have historically resisted regulatory oversight of farming practices.

C. Advocacy groups led by individuals without direct exposure to the affected communities often lack a nuanced understanding of local challenges.

D. Urban-based environmental organizations typically rely on policy advisors with academic expertise in climate science and sustainability.

E. Farming communities are often hesitant to engage with organizations they perceive as outsiders, regardless of the groups’ stated intentions.

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

adityamntr

Joined: 15 Jul 2023

Last visit: 21 Feb 2026

Posts: 111

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 13

Location: India

Concentration: General Management, Strategy

Schools: Booth '27 Fuqua '27 Kellog '27

Posts: 111

Kudos: 81

[1]

27 Dec 2025, 01:41

Kudos

Bookmarks

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

A. argeuemnt talks about those specific rural famrer community which are affected by climate change
B. this talks about the oponnenes of the group, not relevant
C. shows rationale behind the conclusion, hence strenghtens the arguement
D. urban based organisation not relevant arguements
E. farming comunites hesitance cannot speak for intention of the advocacy groups.

Pratyaksh1907

Joined: 17 Nov 2024

Last visit: 19 Apr 2026

Posts: 35

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 38

Products:

Posts: 35

Kudos: 11

[1]

27 Dec 2025, 02:00

Kudos

Bookmarks

Since the individuals have little direct experience in agriculture ------> Would they truly be able to reflect the priorities of the communities they aim to support.

Now, since the link is established, we need to strengthen this claim.

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

A. Irrelevant. This does contain some familiar terms but it is out of context.
B. Weakener. It directly weaken the claim raised by the Critics.
C. Well, this is what we are looking for. Just try putting this statement before the claim made by critics in the argument. You will observe that this is a direct strengthener.
D. Irrelevant
E. Irrelevant. We cannot assume that the individuals in environmental advocacy group are outsiders for these communities.

750rest

Joined: 27 Jul 2022

Last visit: 20 Apr 2026

Posts: 46

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 1,126

Concentration: Marketing, Operations

Products:

Posts: 46

Kudos: 34

[1]

27 Dec 2025, 02:07

Kudos

Bookmarks

A - Still they reflect priorites as long term is also important.
B - Don't strenthen
C - Correct as if they don't understand the nuances they can't truly reflect the priorties the priorities.
D - Doesn't stregthen as policy advisors may also provide good insights.
E - Even if they hesitate it doesn't affect wheyher these groups truly reflect priorties or not.

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

jkkamau

Joined: 25 May 2020

Last visit: 20 Apr 2026

Posts: 226

Own Kudos:

190

Given Kudos: 142

Location: Kenya

Schools: Haas '25

GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46 Verified score

GPA: 3.5

Products:

Schools: Haas '25

GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46 Verified score

Posts: 226

Kudos: 190

27 Dec 2025, 03:15

Kudos

Bookmarks

A. Correct. This choice clearly shows a mismatch between the priorities of the farmers and the advocacy groups
B. This choice attacks the critics instead of strengthening their argument
C. This is quite a tricky choice but it is not as direct as A which directly addresses the borne of contention
D. This actually legitimises the advocacy groups hence incorrect
E. Again this choice also legitimises the advocacy groups even though it implies they may lack on the ground experience
Ans A

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

Gmat860sanskar

Joined: 05 May 2023

Last visit: 20 Apr 2026

Posts: 210

Own Kudos:

111

[1]

Given Kudos: 78

Schools: ISB '26

GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q82 V78 DI80 Verified score

Products:

Schools: ISB '26

GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q82 V78 DI80 Verified score

Posts: 210

Kudos: 111

[1]

27 Dec 2025, 03:34

Kudos

Bookmarks

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

Stimulus :

Claim : critics raises question on whether these advocacy group reflect priority of these communities

Premise : Advocate group is made up of Urban staff and they lack experience in agriculture.

Options:

A: Very tempting, but here conclusion is about farmers best interest and here even if both have different priority, they could have best interest of farmers -- Incorrect

B : Irrelevant -- Incorrect

C : Yes this is exactly what we want, it shows another reason that cements the logical reasoning in the conclusion -- Hold

D : This option is neutral --- Incorrect

E : This is relevant but secondary, not related to main focus of argument --- Incorrect

Ans - C

sunshineeee

Joined: 17 May 2020

Last visit: 09 Apr 2026

Posts: 96

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 223

Location: Indonesia

Schools: Stern '26 (WL) Tepper '26 (WL) BU'26 (A) Ross '26 Johnson '26

Posts: 96

Kudos: 22

[1]

27 Dec 2025, 03:40

Kudos

Bookmarks

Conclusion: the advocacy groups do not reflect the priorities of the farming communities they aim to support

Why?
- the advocacy groups staffed and funded by individuals from urban areas
- little direct exp in agriculture

Unstated assumption:
to support farming communities -> need direct experience in agriculture -

strengthen the conclusion:
C. advocacy led by an individual without direct exposure to the communities --> lacked a nuanced understanding of local challenges
why? lack of understanding can impact to not be ability to prioritize correctly for the farming community

Why others incrrect
A. irrelevant. not argue about rural farmers' priority
B. does not directly argue the correlation of the understanding of the farmer community as a factor
D. irrelevant. not argue on policy-advisory background
E. irrelevant. not argue on the farmer's perception of the organization

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

harishg

Joined: 18 Dec 2018

Last visit: 09 Apr 2026

Posts: 176

Own Kudos:

174

[1]

Given Kudos: 31

GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V84 DI81 Verified score

Products:

GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V84 DI81 Verified score

Posts: 176

Kudos: 174

[1]

27 Dec 2025, 03:58

Kudos

Bookmarks

A - The preference of rural farmers may not be in their own interest in the first place. Therefore, the initiative of the environmental groups would make sense and would only increase the welfare of the farmer.

B - This is a weakener. It suggests that there may be some underlying motives with the opposition against the environmental advocacy groups and may not be for the benefit of the farmers.

C - This is a strengthener. It furthers adds to the premise that the leader of such groups, if not experienced in rural farming, would lead without the nuanced understanding required.

D - This is a weakener as it suggests that even without experience , since policy advisory is being sought, the groups will act in the interest of the farmers.

E - Regardless of the farmer’s actions, the advocacy groups may still work in favour of the farmers.

Therefore, Option C imo.

msignatius

Joined: 28 Aug 2025

Last visit: 09 Apr 2026

Posts: 131

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 31

Location: India

Concentration: Strategy, Marketing

Schools: ISB '27 NUS '26 INSEAD Jan '26 (S) IESE '26 (D) HEC (S) IMD ESADE'26 Judge '26 LBS '27

GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q86 V85 DI84 Verified score

GPA: 3.5

WE:Marketing (Consulting)

Products:

Schools: ISB '27 NUS '26 INSEAD Jan '26 (S) IESE '26 (D) HEC (S) IMD ESADE'26 Judge '26 LBS '27

GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q86 V85 DI84 Verified score

Posts: 131

Kudos: 98

27 Dec 2025, 04:12

Kudos

Bookmarks

I took very long for this one before marking A - mainly because I was contemplating what aspect do I find more congruent with why the criticisms towards advocacy group is accurate - Whether, as we see in C, these urban-area groups due to their lack of exposure to affected rural communities lack an understanding of local challenges (and, thus, cannot act in their best interest); or what we see in A, that the initiatives proposed by advocacy groups are quite explicitly NOT priorities of rural farmers, who are more concerned with short-term economic survival (and, thus, are not acting in their best interest). Clearly, critics are questioning "whether these groups truly reflect priorities" - with which, I feel, the dilemma only increases, as reflecting something can be done by - once again - action (or proposing something) or intentions (or, intending something).

I clearly picked A, as while the debate was between "were the intentions wrong (C)" Vs "were the actions wrong", I genuinely feel actions are a stronger medium in communicating ground realities, and thus most capable strengthening this criticism.

Hopefully I am right with this one - as out of hundreds of CR questions, none has tested my fundamentals of the GMAT-esque reasoning as this one.

Anyway, here's why B, D, and E are certainly wrong:

B: This just shows these opponents have ulterior motives - that they're resisting advocacy groups' actions because they resist the idea of regulatory oversight in the first place. You can imagine these to be more libertarian, and acting on their fundamentalism, but that's only for your own understanding.

D: This acts against the criticism - acting a layer of authenticity to the work of the organizations. You could say academic experts aren't grounded in reality either, but that will be your assumption, not the passage's.

E: This would imply any group outside of the local farming community is counterproductive to these communities, because of the lack of trust - and not just advocacy groups. This blanket definition will also mean those actually reflecting priorities of farming communities, and those with actual exposure to agriculture, cannot be considered as supportive.

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

MANASH94

Joined: 25 Jun 2025

Last visit: 11 Apr 2026

Posts: 88

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 16

Location: India

Schools: IIM IIM ISB

GPA: 2.9

Schools: IIM IIM ISB

Posts: 88

Kudos: 63

27 Dec 2025, 04:34

Kudos

Bookmarks

We need to focus on the specific claim made by the critics.

Deconstructing the Argument:
Observation is that environmental groups representing farmers are actually staffed and funded by urbanites with no agricultural experience.
Criticism is that because of this urban-rural gap, these groups might not truly reflect or represent the priorities of the actual farming communities.
Our Goal is to find a statement that bridges the gap between lack of experience and failure to represent priorities.

Evaluating the Options :
A. Rural farmers often prioritize short-term economic survival over long-term environmental initiatives. (Correct)
This strengthens the criticism significantly. It identifies a specific, fundamental clash of priorities.

B. Some opponents have historically resisted regulatory oversight. (Seems Incorrect)
This attacks the critics rather than strengthening the criticism. It suggests the opposition might be biased, which weakens the case against the advocacy groups.

C. Advocacy groups led by outsiders often lack a nuanced understanding of local challenges. (Close option)
My approach to CR that lack of understanding is a general claim. So I still feel A is a better answer than C.

D. Urban-based organizations rely on academic expertise in climate science. (Seems Incorrect)
This actually serves as a defense of the groups. it suggests that they have high-level scientific expertise to offer.

E. Farming communities are often hesitant to engage with organizations they perceive as outsiders. (Seems Incorrect)
This describes a problem with communication or trust, but it doesn't necessarily mean the groups' priorities are wrong.

IMO Answer: A

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

Reon

Joined: 16 Sep 2025

Last visit: 28 Mar 2026

Posts: 134

Own Kudos:

121

Given Kudos: 4

Posts: 134

Kudos: 121

27 Dec 2025, 04:51

Kudos

Bookmarks

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the criticism raised about the advocacy groups?

A. Rural farmers often prioritize short-term economic survival over long-term environmental initiatives proposed by advocacy groups.(This option directly shows a misalignment of priorities between what farmers actually care about and what the advocacy groups propose. This directly shows a difference of priorities for two) Correct

B. Some of the most vocal opponents of environmental advocacy groups are also those who have historically resisted regulatory oversight of farming practices.(This option attacks the critiques) Wrong

C. Advocacy groups led by individuals without direct exposure to the affected communities often lack a nuanced understanding of local challenges.(This option mainly focuses on understanding and also there is a possibility that any advocacy group is led by an individual who has experienced the local challenges) Wrong

D. Urban-based environmental organizations typically rely on policy advisors with academic expertise in climate science and sustainability.(This option is irrelevant) Wrong

E. Farming communities are often hesitant to engage with organizations they perceive as outsiders, regardless of the groups’ stated intentions.(This option explains why farmers are resistant and not about different priorities) Wrong

Dereno

Joined: 22 May 2020

Last visit: 21 Apr 2026

Posts: 1,398

Own Kudos:

1,372

Given Kudos: 425

Products:

Posts: 1,398

Kudos: 1,372

27 Dec 2025, 05:13

Kudos

Bookmarks

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

The question is about rural farming and the role of Environmental Advocacy Groups (EAGs).

The EAGs claim that they represent the interests of rural farming communities, esp after climate change.

But, these EAGs are staffed, funded by individuals who are from Urban areas. These people have little direct experience in agriculture, which means they might have knowledge gained through books, but not the hands on experience which is vital for agricultural success.

So, the question arises whether these EAGs truly represent and reflect the priorities of the rural farming communities they aim to support.

We need to find the option that strengthens the criticism on EAGs.

A) This is the correct answer, as the EAGs focuses on long term aspect - mitigate the effects of climate change or develop resilient crops against climate change. Whereas, the rural farming communities work or act on ad hoc priorities, addressing their financial and self sufficient needs. So, there is a yawning gap between EAG and rural farmers. This strengthens the criticism on EAGs.

B) This brings into a context a new view - regulation of farming. This is entirely out of scope, the issue is the priorities mismatch between rural farming communities and EAGs. Hence, Wrong.

C) This makes a generalised view that without direct link with the affected communities, it’s harder to propose solutions, understanding the local challenges. These EAGs might be experts proposing alternatives for all challenges the rural communities face, but this is different from setting priorities. Hence, Wrong.

D) This options assumes everything to make a statement. But, actually it’s a generalised view, which may or may not be true. We can also have an urban based organisation which is predominant with rural agricultural experts. Hence, wrong.

E) This option speaks about the engagement and interpersonal relationships between two groups - EAGs and Rural farming communities. Hence, Wrong.

Option A

Rishm

Joined: 05 May 2024

Last visit: 20 Apr 2026

Posts: 241

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 67

Location: India

Schools: Johnson '27 LBS '27 IESE '27

GPA: 10

WE:Consulting (Consulting)

Products:

Schools: Johnson '27 LBS '27 IESE '27

Posts: 241

Kudos: 22

27 Dec 2025, 06:03

Kudos

Bookmarks

A and E are the strongest options, however i went with A as it directly attacks the core and helps the criticism and E does not attack the core. it helps the situation.

adityaprateek15

Joined: 26 May 2023

Last visit: 18 Apr 2026

Posts: 346

Own Kudos:

170

Given Kudos: 323

Location: India

Schools: Ross '26 Tepper '26 McCombs '26

GPA: 2.7

Products:

Schools: Ross '26 Tepper '26 McCombs '26

Posts: 346

Kudos: 170

27 Dec 2025, 06:14

Kudos

Bookmarks

A. This is a strong strengthener as it shows that the priorities of the farmers would've been different which directly supports what the critics think about this advocacy group.

B. Incorrect. This will weaken the criticism.

C. Incorrect. This choice represents what happens generally. It shows that these groups are misguided, but it doesn't strengthen the criticism.

D. This is irrelevant. This choice might weaken the criticism.

E. Incorrect. This shows why farmers might not be in favor of the advocacies and changes brought by these groups, but it doesn't support the critics opinion.

Option A

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

Kinshook

Major Poster

Joined: 03 Jun 2019

Last visit: 20 Apr 2026

Posts: 5,985

Own Kudos:

5,855

[1]

Given Kudos: 163

Location: India

Schools: HBS '26 CBS '26 Wharton '26

GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34 Verified score

WE:Engineering (Transportation)

Products:

Schools: HBS '26 CBS '26 Wharton '26

GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34 Verified score

Posts: 5,985

Kudos: 5,855

[1]

27 Dec 2025, 06:15

Kudos

Bookmarks

Several environmental advocacy groups claim to represent the interests of rural faming communities affected by climate change.
Yet, many of these organizations are primarily staffed and funded by individuals from urband areas, with little direct experience in agriculture.
This had led some critics to question whether these groups truly reflect the priorities of the communities they aim to support.

Objective: Strengthen the criticism.

Options:

A. The statement is concerned with difference in priorities of rural farmers and advocacy groups but don't directly challenge the advocacy group's lack of experience and true representation. Incorrect

B. The statement that most vocal opponents of environmental advocacy groups are those who have historically resisted regulatory oversight of farming practices questions the credibility of critics with ulterior motives. Incorrect

C. The statement that advocacy groups led by individuals without direct exposure to the affected communities often lack a nuanced understanding of local challenges surely strengthens the criticism that without lack of experience and nuanced understanding advocacy groups don't truly represents rural farming communities affected by climate change. Correct

D. The statement is concerned with scientific expertise of advocacy group but don't challenge their lack of experience or nuanced understanding. Incorrect

E. The statement is concerned with barriers to engagement with farming communities by outsider organizations but don't challenge their lack of experience or true representation. Incorrect

IMO C

arnab24

Joined: 16 Jan 2024

Last visit: 25 Feb 2026

Posts: 96

Own Kudos:

[1]

Given Kudos: 7

Location: India

Schools: ISB '26

GPA: 8.80

Products:

Schools: ISB '26

Posts: 96

Kudos: 81

[1]

27 Dec 2025, 06:40

Kudos

Bookmarks

The conclusion states that Critics are questioning whether Environmental Advocacy groups truly reflect the priorities of the communities they aim to support. Reasoning is that many of these organizations are primarily staffed and funded by individuals from urban areas , with little direct experience in agriculture. Assumption of the critics is that no experience in rural farming community practices lead to questioning the intent of representing the interests of rural farming. Are they really qualified? We need to strengthen this assumption. Let's check options one by one :

(A) It's incorrect and not strengthening the argument. We are more concerned on the priorities of Environmental advocacy group and not on the difference in the initiatives proposed by two groups. Even the difference is present does it lead to the fact that the groups are not representing the interests of rural farming communities. Actually not , they might be whole heartedly represent the interests , just thoughts are different. So this is not actually strengthening the criticism.
(B) It's incorrect and not supporting the criticism. We are not concerned about the background of the vocal opponents.
(C) It's correct and strongly supporting the criticism. It's also supporting the assumption.
(D) It's undermining the argument. So it's incorrect.
(E) We don't know who are outsiders. The argument does not explicitly state anything about outsiders and marking urban as outsiders is too strong assumption by us. We should not make any assumption here. So it's incorrect. Focus on Critic's assumption. Just remember one thing, ask yourself is it your words or their words. GMAT NINJA Technique

So, Answer is C.

Bunuel

Gift

12 Days of Christmas Competition

This question is part of our holiday event

Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

firefox300

Joined: 15 Dec 2025

Last visit: 27 Dec 2025

Posts: 90

Own Kudos:

Posts: 90

Kudos: 87

27 Dec 2025, 06:46

Kudos

Bookmarks

A CORRECT. Advocacy groups promote long-term environmental initiatives. Farmers prioritize short-term economic survival. Therefore, the groups' agendas do not align with farmers' priorities.

B It attacks the critics' motives, not the advocacy groups' representativeness.

C It suggests possible misunderstanding, not actual divergence.

D It emphasizes expertise, which may actually strengthen the groups' credibility.

E It talks about farmers' reluctance to engage, not whether the groups misrepresent priorities.

The correct answer is A

topgmat25

Joined: 15 Dec 2025

Last visit: 05 Jan 2026

Posts: 90

Own Kudos:

Posts: 90

Kudos: 87

27 Dec 2025, 07:12

Kudos

Bookmarks

A Farmers care more about immediate income than long-term green projects. This directly shows different priorities. Correct answer.

B Irrelevant. It talks about opponents' history with regulations.

C It says groups lack local insight, which might cause misrepresentation, but doesn't prove actual priority conflict.

D It mentions the groups' academic advisors. It doesn't address whether groups reflect farmers' concerns.

E This could reduce input but it doesn't itself prove priority misalignment.

The answer is A

geocircle

Joined: 14 Dec 2025

Last visit: 27 Dec 2025

Posts: 90

Own Kudos:

Posts: 90

Kudos: 87

27 Dec 2025, 07:28

Kudos

Bookmarks

A Right answer. This directly suggests a discrepancy in priorities: groups push long-term environmental initiatives but farmers care more about short-term economic survival. So the groups aren't reflecting farmers' immediate concerns.

B This tells us who opposes them, not whether groups truly reflect farmers' priorities.

C "lack a nuanced understanding of local challenges" doesn't directly imply that priorities are different.

D This tells us their expertise source but it doesn't directly show they don't reflect farmers' priorities.

E This indicates skepticism among farmers toward outside organizations. It might lead to misaligned priorities, but A is a better option.

Answer A

sanjitscorps18

Joined: 26 Jan 2019

Last visit: 03 Mar 2026

Posts: 723

Own Kudos:

739

[1]

Given Kudos: 130

Location: India

Schools: IMD'26

Products:

Schools: IMD'26

Posts: 723

Kudos: 739

[1]

27 Dec 2025, 07:30

Kudos

Bookmarks

A -> This points out to an analogous situation where the priorities of the two groups do not match. However, it may or may not be true for the case of climate change.
B -> This talks about groups other than the two groups discussed in the passage
C -> Correct. This brings about the disconnect between the funding group and the people being funded and hence may reflect different priorities. If we look at it this way, this becomes an unstated assumption to strengthen the argument.
D -> This provides the basis of decision making by urban funding groups
E -> The conclusion is about whether the funding groups reflect the priorities of the farmers. This goes on a different line where the farmers' association with such groups is being evaluated.

Option C

Bunuel