Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 10:48 It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 10:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
bhanu29
User avatar
GMAT Forum Director
Joined: 02 Oct 2024
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 797
Own Kudos:
493
 [11]
Given Kudos: 745
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V85 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 715 Q87 V84 DI86
GPA: 9.11
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Products:
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pratikshyasuar
Joined: 19 May 2024
Last visit: 28 Aug 2026
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 170
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bhanu29
User avatar
GMAT Forum Director
Joined: 02 Oct 2024
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 797
Own Kudos:
493
 [4]
Given Kudos: 745
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V85 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 715 Q87 V84 DI86
GPA: 9.11
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Products:
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
How many $20 fares would cover the cost of installation solely from the increase in tips (pre-tax but after transaction fees)?
[color=#000000]200[/color]
[color=#000000]225[/color]
[color=#000000]250[/color]
[color=#000000]275[/color]
[color=#000000]300[/color]
The increase in tip percentage from 10% to 25% is 15%. On a $20 fare, 15% is $3. The transaction fee of 3% is levied on both fare and tip ($20 + 25%, or $5, for a total of $25), and 3% of $25 is $0.75. Thus, the increase in tips, less the transaction fee, is $3 – $0.75 = $2.25.

To cover a $450 installation cost, you divide $450 by $2.25 to get 200 fares.

Quote:
[color=#0f0f0f]For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement can be shown to be true using the information provided. Otherwise, select No.
[/color]
[color=#ffffff][color=#000000]YES[/color][/color][color=#ffffff][color=#000000]NO[/color][/color]
[color=#ffffff][color=#000000]In making his or her case to subsidize installations, the city official cites none of the benefits described in the report.[/color][/color]
[color=#ffffff][color=#000000]The potential use of the LCD screens as an advertising medium is of interest to both drivers and taxi companies.[/color][/color]
[color=#ffffff][color=#000000]Both the city official and the commissioner expect that tax reporting of tips would improve with the new systems.[/color][/color]

Statement 1: Yes. The city official does not cite any of the benefits described in the report. The consultant discusses how the new systems benefit drivers and taxi companies. In contrast, the city official only mentions how the new systems could benefit the city government (better tax collections) and riders.

Statement 2: No . You know that the potential for advertising revenue (through the screens) interests the companies (in fact, it “thrilled” them), but you aren’t told whether this interests the drivers.

Statement 3: Yes. The commissioner only disagrees with the official’s expectation that tax reporting of fares would improve. In fact, the commissioner makes this contrast very explicit by emphasizing the word fares, and then goes on to say that “your other points... are well taken.” So you can conclude that the commissioner also expects that tax reporting of tips would improve with the new systems. (The official has already come out and said as much.)

Quote:
[color=#0f0f0f]For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement can be shown to be true using the information provided. Otherwise, select No.
[/color]
[color=#ffffff][color=#000000]YES[/color][/color][color=#ffffff][color=#000000]NO[/color][/color]
[color=#ffffff][color=#000000]Even after deduction of the transaction fee, the average pre-tax revenue per fare (including tips) is more than 11% higher with the new card readers than before.[/color][/color]
[color=#ffffff][color=#000000]For a taxi fare to be legal, the meter must be turned on.[/color][/color]
[color=#ffffff][color=#000000]The average fleet size per company is greater than 15 taxis.[/color][/color]

Statement 1: No. Call a fare F . Under the old system, the pre-tax revenue per fare is F + 10% of F, or 1.1 F.

Under the new system, the pre-tax revenue per fare seems to be F + 25%, or 1.25 F, but then you have to subtract 3%, or multiply by 0.97:
1.25 F(0.97) = 1.2125 F.

Now, you have to figure out how much greater (percent-wise) this second number is than the first. What percent increase gets you from 1.1 F to 1.2125 F? The answer is ~10.2% (1.12125 divided by 1.1 is 1.10227..), which is NOT greater than 11%.

Statement 2: Yes. The commissioner specifically says that “if the meter is turned off, the driver can only accept an illegal fare.” In other words, all fares that are accepted with the meter turned off are illegal. So then you have to turn the meter on for a fare to be legal. Doing so doesn’t guarantee that a fare is legal (there are probably ways to have an illegal fare happen with the meter on), but you can’t have a legal fare without the meter on.

Statement 3: No. The average loan size that the commissioner predicts is $6,000—that’s the amount to cover “the full cost for the average fleet.” Since the installation cost is $450, the average fleet size must be $6,000 divided by $450, or 13.3 taxis. This number is not greater than 15 taxis.
User avatar
ParamjitDasGMAT
Joined: 01 Jan 2016
Last visit: 30 Aug 2026
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
136
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Status:GMAT Private Tutor
Affiliations: Co-founder at a GMAT Prep Company
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q86 V89 DI82
GMAT Focus 2: 695 Q84 V90 DI80
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.66
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 2: 695 Q84 V90 DI80
GMAT 4: 750 Q50 V41
Posts: 108
Kudos: 136
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi suburbMBA

I am happy to help.

2(c) is about improved reporting of tips. The commissioner has doubts over improved reporting of fares (a subtle difference), but he agrees on the other points (which would include improved reporting of tips, the ability to share the live location of a driver, and so on).
suburbMBA
For Question 2(c), does the commissioner not explicitly say that he has doubts over the ability of card readers to improve tax reporting of fares? Why is the answer YES? Is there something to be inferred from his next sentence that I've missed?
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 17 Aug 2026
Posts: 689
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,706
Location: India
Posts: 689
Kudos: 193
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi ParamjitDasGMAT

Could you please help me with 2(a) - In making his or her case to subsidize installations, the city official cites none of the benefits described in the report?

My reasoning is that the city council does highlight advantages "I propose that we use our left-over economic development grant money to directly subsidize the installation of these credit card readers in all licensed taxis. For one, there will be much better tax reporting of tips and of fares themselves. We will also be able to provide numerous additional services to riders (both residents and visitors), such as maps showing the cab’s position in real time."

[color=#0f0f0f]Please let me know where I am going wrong here.[/color]


ParamjitDasGMAT
Hi suburbMBA

I am happy to help.

2(c) is about improved reporting of tips. The commissioner has doubts over improved reporting of fares (a subtle difference), but he agrees on the other points (which would include improved reporting of tips, the ability to share the live location of a driver, and so on).

User avatar
ParamjitDasGMAT
Joined: 01 Jan 2016
Last visit: 30 Aug 2026
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
136
 [2]
Given Kudos: 33
Status:GMAT Private Tutor
Affiliations: Co-founder at a GMAT Prep Company
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q86 V89 DI82
GMAT Focus 2: 695 Q84 V90 DI80
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.66
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 2: 695 Q84 V90 DI80
GMAT 4: 750 Q50 V41
Posts: 108
Kudos: 136
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sure, agrasan,

So the benefits are mentioned - absolutely correct. But the benefits highlighted in Tab 1, mostly to do with increased revenues (fares and tips) aren't mentioned in the city official's email.

Hope this helps. Let me know if anything is unclear.
agrasan
Hi ParamjitDasGMAT

Could you please help me with 2(a) - In making his or her case to subsidize installations, the city official cites none of the benefits described in the report?

My reasoning is that the city council does highlight advantages "I propose that we use our left-over economic development grant money to directly subsidize the installation of these credit card readers in all licensed taxis. For one, there will be much better tax reporting of tips and of fares themselves. We will also be able to provide numerous additional services to riders (both residents and visitors), such as maps showing the cab’s position in real time."

[color=#0f0f0f]Please let me know where I am going wrong here.[/color]



User avatar
pizzapalooza
Joined: 28 Feb 2026
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 7
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q86 V82 DI83
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q86 V82 DI83
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The first question explicitly states "solely from the increase in tips", then why do we also look at the change from the 3% processing fee applied on fares to get to the right answer i.e. 200?
Ideally shouldn't it be 5*0.97 - 2 i.e. 2.85 (Increase only from tips)
vs 25*0.97 - 22 i.e. 2.25

Only when I consider 450/2.25 do I get 200, which has been provided as the correct answer to this question.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,287
Own Kudos:
33,890
 [1]
Given Kudos: 715
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,287
Kudos: 33,890
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi pizzapalooza,

Your reading of "solely from the increase in tips" is actually right about one thing: the only revenue gain we count is the jump in tips ($2 → $5, i.e. +$3). We don't add advertising revenue or anything else. So you've correctly isolated the revenue side.

The catch is that the phrase governs which gains to count - not which costs to ignore. And the 3% fee is a cost. The Report tab is explicit: the fee is "levied on both fare and tip" per transaction. Once a card reader is installed, the whole $25 runs through it, so the fee is 3% × $25 = $0.75 - which includes $0.60 on the fare.

Here's the part that resolves your doubt: before installation, fares were paid in cash, so there was no fee at all. Installing the reader is what creates the $0.60 fare-side fee. That $0.60 is a brand-new cost caused by the very system the tip increase is supposed to pay off - so it has to come out of the gain.

Your math, with the missing piece added:

- Your number: $5 × 0.97 − $2 = $2.85 (fee applied only to the tip)
- What's missing: the new fee on the fare, $20 × 0.03 = $0.60
- Net gain per fare: $2.85 - $0.60 = $2.25

Therefore $450 ÷ $2.25 = 200.

So "solely from tips" is telling you to leave out other revenue streams (ads, services) - not to pretend the fare-side fee doesn't exist. That fee is an unavoidable cost of switching the fare to a card, so it correctly nets against the tip gain.

Answer: 200

pizzapalooza
The first question explicitly states "solely from the increase in tips", then why do we also look at the change from the 3% processing fee applied on fares to get to the right answer i.e. 200?
Ideally shouldn't it be 5*0.97 - 2 i.e. 2.85 (Increase only from tips)
vs 25*0.97 - 22 i.e. 2.25

Only when I consider 450/2.25 do I get 200, which has been provided as the correct answer to this question.
Moderators:
Math Expert
113056 posts
DI Forum Moderator
410 posts