Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 15:38 It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 15:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
geocircle
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 27 Jul 2026
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
143
 [1]
Posts: 150
Kudos: 143
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mardee
Joined: 22 Nov 2022
Last visit: 19 Aug 2026
Posts: 286
Own Kudos:
248
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 286
Kudos: 248
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sunshineeee
Joined: 17 May 2020
Last visit: 30 Aug 2026
Posts: 174
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 266
Location: Indonesia
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
topgmat25
Joined: 15 Dec 2025
Last visit: 27 Jul 2026
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
139
 [1]
Posts: 150
Kudos: 139
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A The total number of goats each farm owns does not affect the profit calculated for each goat.

B Loan repayments hurt earnings, but they are a temporary financing cost instead of an operating disadvantage of the breed.

C Larger farms may collect bonuses, yet that difference comes from herd size rather than the goats themselves.

D Poor adaptation to the local environment is a drawback, but it is not the strongest explanation for lower monthly profit. E is better.

E Correct answer. The increased feeding expense is greater than the extra income from higher milk production.

The answer is E
User avatar
firefox300
Joined: 15 Dec 2025
Last visit: 27 Jul 2026
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
140
 [1]
Posts: 151
Kudos: 140
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A Twice as many goats doesn't fix the per goat monthly number.

B Loans aren't production costs.

C Bonuses are for the whole farm, not each goat's monthly profit.

D Short life means more replacements over time, but that doesn't make this month's milking less profitable.

E Best option. Feed costs eat up more than the extra milk pays for, month after month.

The correct answer is E
User avatar
LibrarianTurtle
Joined: 12 Nov 2024
Last visit: 25 Aug 2026
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
GPA: 3.9
Products:
Posts: 36
Kudos: 24
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
  • New breed of goat = double amount of milk compared to traditional breed.

  • Despite more milk, farms with new breed report lower net profit.

  • Price of milk is identical.

A-)Number of new breed of goat 100 --> Milk 200; Number of traditional breed of goat = 200 ----> Milk 200. Does not explain lower net profit. (Not sufficient)
B-)New breed farmers earn 200 --> from 200 milk; Traditional breed farmers earn 100 --->from 100 milk 200*%70= 140 (60 goes to loan) does not explain the paradox (Not sufficient)
C-) New breed farmers have 70 sheep ---> 140 milk ---> 140 dollars; traditional breed farmers have 100 sheep --> 100 milk ---> 100 dollars + 20 dollars bonus. New breed farmers profit > Traditional breed farmer profit (Not sufficient)
D-)Traditional breed lives 2 months ---- 1 month 100 milk----> 100 dollars profit in a month ; New breed lives 1/2 month ---->1/2 month 100 milk ---->100 dollars profit (Same profit does not explain paradox - Not sufficient)
E-)If cost of new breed is greater than revenue it creates compared to traditional breed ----> lower net profit
Ans. (E)
IMO
User avatar
canopyinthecity
Joined: 12 Jul 2025
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 154
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Products:
Posts: 154
Kudos: 106
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A B C D does not explain the paradox

E is the answer as higher cost than revenue => lower net credit loss
User avatar
DishaSaha
Joined: 03 Nov 2024
Last visit: 30 Aug 2026
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
49
 [2]
Given Kudos: 24
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V75 DI78
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V75 DI78
Posts: 64
Kudos: 49
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Passage analysis,
Unexpected pattern observed.
Milk production capabilty/ goat/monthnet profit/ goat /monthper litre price
Traditional breed farmsxyz
new breed farms2x<<<yz

Note that all concerned parameters are given for adult female goat.

Question type: Logical reasoning

Answer choice analysis,
A. We are not concerned about total profit. Author talks about per goat topic. So irrelevant.
B. Notice how the pattern is unexpected. So loan factor can not be the case and we are talking about substantial profit difference. And this do not give any conclusive info to compare with the traditional breed. Logic is in the same line but inconclusive.
C.Author is talking about adult female goats. So out of context.
D. Passage concerned about profit per goat per month. So, this option is incorrect.
E. This is the correct answer. This option clearly shows not only how per goat cost is in general higher for traditional goats but also clarifies that the amount is bigger than revenue generated. Decreasing the profit substantially.

Bunuel
In a mountainous region where small-scale dairy farming has been practiced for centuries, agricultural extension officers recently documented an unexpected pattern: farms that had adopted a newly introduced breed of goat—one capable of producing roughly twice as much milk per month as the traditional local breed—reported substantially lower net profits per adult female goat per month than farms that continued raising the traditional breed, despite selling their milk at identical per-liter prices.

Which of the following, if true, does the most to explain the surprising result in the passage above?

(A) Farms raising the traditional breed have, on average, nearly twice as many female goats as those that adopted the newly introduced breed, resulting in comparable total milk output across the two groups.

(B) Most farms that have adopted the newly introduced breed have done so through a subsidized loan program; many are still repaying those loans, at a fixed monthly amount approximately equal to thirty percent of their aggregate monthly milk revenue.

(C) Regional dairy cooperatives have begun offering modest volume bonuses to farms producing above a threshold that most traditional-breed farms meet but that most farms with the newly introduced breed, having smaller herds, do not.

(D) The newly introduced breed is neither well adapted to the local climate nor robust against locally prevalent bacterial diseases, so it lives just under half as long after reaching maturity, on average, as does the traditional local breed.

(E) To sustain its elevated milk output, the newly introduced breed requires imported supplemental feed, whose cost per animal is slightly greater than the additional milk revenue generated by the new breed over the traditional local breed.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
JollyScale
Joined: 04 Jul 2026
Last visit: 28 Aug 2026
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
49
 [2]
Location: India
GPA: 6.87/7
WE:Marketing (Finance: Diversified Financial Services)
Products:
Posts: 55
Kudos: 49
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
paradox:

new breed gives 2x milk, same selling price, but lower net profit.

need a reason why costs > extra revenue.

a) talks about herd size, but profit is per goat. irrelevant.

b) loan payments. possible, but not directly due to the breed.

c) misses volume bonus. doesn't explain lower per goat profit well.

d) shorter lifespan. long-term issue, not monthly profit.

e) extra feed costs more than the extra milk revenue. directly explains why profit per goat is lower despite more milk.


ans: e

Bunuel
In a mountainous region where small-scale dairy farming has been practiced for centuries, agricultural extension officers recently documented an unexpected pattern: farms that had adopted a newly introduced breed of goat—one capable of producing roughly twice as much milk per month as the traditional local breed—reported substantially lower net profits per adult female goat per month than farms that continued raising the traditional breed, despite selling their milk at identical per-liter prices.

Which of the following, if true, does the most to explain the surprising result in the passage above?

(A) Farms raising the traditional breed have, on average, nearly twice as many female goats as those that adopted the newly introduced breed, resulting in comparable total milk output across the two groups.

(B) Most farms that have adopted the newly introduced breed have done so through a subsidized loan program; many are still repaying those loans, at a fixed monthly amount approximately equal to thirty percent of their aggregate monthly milk revenue.

(C) Regional dairy cooperatives have begun offering modest volume bonuses to farms producing above a threshold that most traditional-breed farms meet but that most farms with the newly introduced breed, having smaller herds, do not.

(D) The newly introduced breed is neither well adapted to the local climate nor robust against locally prevalent bacterial diseases, so it lives just under half as long after reaching maturity, on average, as does the traditional local breed.

(E) To sustain its elevated milk output, the newly introduced breed requires imported supplemental feed, whose cost per animal is slightly greater than the additional milk revenue generated by the new breed over the traditional local breed.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
ShreyaMittal1609
Joined: 05 Nov 2025
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
45
 [2]
Given Kudos: 208
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q77 V77 DI77
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q77 V77 DI77
Posts: 82
Kudos: 45
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My ans is E)

This is an resolve paradox question- we need to find why even if output is doubled, profitability has decreased- one reason could be production cost has increased as this breed is costlier to maintain.

A) This does not help in resolving but make the paradox worse by telling that output is comparable still- Eliminate.
B) Even if 30% of doubled output (doubled revenue) is loan repayment doesn't indicate that profitability decreases- Eliminate.
C) Bonus is linked to outputs and not size of herds hence it is unclear- Eliminate
D) Life of new breed is shorter, this could be a reason for lower profits over the years but it does not directly impacts the low profitability- Eliminate
E) This directly explains why additional revenue is not enough for additional costs- CORRECT.
Bunuel
In a mountainous region where small-scale dairy farming has been practiced for centuries, agricultural extension officers recently documented an unexpected pattern: farms that had adopted a newly introduced breed of goat—one capable of producing roughly twice as much milk per month as the traditional local breed—reported substantially lower net profits per adult female goat per month than farms that continued raising the traditional breed, despite selling their milk at identical per-liter prices.

Which of the following, if true, does the most to explain the surprising result in the passage above?

(A) Farms raising the traditional breed have, on average, nearly twice as many female goats as those that adopted the newly introduced breed, resulting in comparable total milk output across the two groups.

(B) Most farms that have adopted the newly introduced breed have done so through a subsidized loan program; many are still repaying those loans, at a fixed monthly amount approximately equal to thirty percent of their aggregate monthly milk revenue.

(C) Regional dairy cooperatives have begun offering modest volume bonuses to farms producing above a threshold that most traditional-breed farms meet but that most farms with the newly introduced breed, having smaller herds, do not.

(D) The newly introduced breed is neither well adapted to the local climate nor robust against locally prevalent bacterial diseases, so it lives just under half as long after reaching maturity, on average, as does the traditional local breed.

(E) To sustain its elevated milk output, the newly introduced breed requires imported supplemental feed, whose cost per animal is slightly greater than the additional milk revenue generated by the new breed over the traditional local breed.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
gullyboy09
Joined: 13 Oct 2025
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 297
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 71
Products:
Posts: 297
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi MartyMurray, I was confused between B and E because of the word "substantially" in the passage. How come E can be the answer?
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,287
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 715
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,287
Kudos: 33,892
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi gullyboy09,

Good instinct to lock onto the wording, but here the two "slightly / substantially" phrases are measuring different things, and that's the whole trap.

What "slightly greater" in E is actually compared to. E says the feed cost is slightly greater than the additional milk revenue the new breed brings in over the traditional breed. That additional revenue is not small - the new breed produces twice as much milk, so the extra revenue equals the traditional breed's entire per-goat revenue. So "slightly greater than the additional revenue" means the feed eats up all of that extra revenue and a bit more. Net effect: new-breed profit drops just below the traditional breed's. That is exactly the reversal the passage reports.

Why "slightly" can still read as "substantially" in profit terms. Profit is a thin margin - revenue minus costs. A cost that wipes out the whole extra revenue and then digs slightly into the base profit can be a small number in dollars but a large share of the profit. So "slightly greater cost" and "substantially lower profit" are fully compatible.

Now run B's numbers - this is the clincher. Call the traditional per-goat revenue R, so the new breed earns 2R. B takes 30% of that as loan repayment: 0.7 x 2R = 1.4R. That's still higher than the traditional breed's R. So B doesn't just fail to explain a "substantial" drop - it leaves the new breed more profitable. B points the wrong way entirely.

Therefore, E is the only choice that even makes new-breed profit lower. On a "does the most to explain" question, that settles it.

Quick gut-check on margins: if you sell something for $10 that costs you $9, your profit is $1. Add just $0.50 of cost - "slight" - and profit falls to $0.50, a 50% drop. Small cost, big profit swing. That's the mechanism in E.

Answer: E

gullyboy09
Hi MartyMurray, I was confused between B and E because of the word "substantially" in the passage. How come E can be the answer?
User avatar
gullyboy09
Joined: 13 Oct 2025
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 297
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Products:
Posts: 297
Kudos: 24
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi egmat, kindly request you to not reply to my queries. You use AI and doesn't even read it before posting. I wish someone can block you here.

In your own example, if $9 is cost for tradition, and 9.5 for new breed, its not slightly above, its more than 5%, not just slightly above.

In a mountainous region where small-scale dairy farming has been practiced for centuries, agricultural extension officers recently documented an unexpected pattern: farms that had adopted a newly introduced breed of goat—one capable of producing roughly twice as much milk per month as the traditional local breed—reported substantially lower net profits per adult female goat per month than farms that continued raising the traditional breed, despite selling their milk at identical per-liter prices.
egmat
Hi gullyboy09,

Good instinct to lock onto the wording, but here the two "slightly / substantially" phrases are measuring different things, and that's the whole trap.

What "slightly greater" in E is actually compared to. E says the feed cost is slightly greater than the additional milk revenue the new breed brings in over the traditional breed. That additional revenue is not small - the new breed produces twice as much milk, so the extra revenue equals the traditional breed's entire per-goat revenue. So "slightly greater than the additional revenue" means the feed eats up all of that extra revenue and a bit more. Net effect: new-breed profit drops just below the traditional breed's. That is exactly the reversal the passage reports.

Why "slightly" can still read as "substantially" in profit terms. Profit is a thin margin - revenue minus costs. A cost that wipes out the whole extra revenue and then digs slightly into the base profit can be a small number in dollars but a large share of the profit. So "slightly greater cost" and "substantially lower profit" are fully compatible.

Now run B's numbers - this is the clincher. Call the traditional per-goat revenue R, so the new breed earns 2R. B takes 30% of that as loan repayment: 0.7 x 2R = 1.4R. That's still higher than the traditional breed's R. So B doesn't just fail to explain a "substantial" drop - it leaves the new breed more profitable. B points the wrong way entirely.

Therefore, E is the only choice that even makes new-breed profit lower. On a "does the most to explain" question, that settles it.

Quick gut-check on margins: if you sell something for $10 that costs you $9, your profit is $1. Add just $0.50 of cost - "slight" - and profit falls to $0.50, a 50% drop. Small cost, big profit swing. That's the mechanism in E.

Answer: E


User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,287
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 715
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,287
Kudos: 33,892
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi gullyboy09,

Taking the example first. $9 to $9.50 is a 5.5% rise in cost, and yes, that is technically more than 5%. But the example was not making a claim about how big the cost increase is. The example was showing what a small cost does to a thin margin: profit falls from $1 to $0.50, a 50% drop for a 5.5% increase in cost. I.e. a small movement in cost, large movement in profit. That is the mechanism, and 5.5% would still be considered a slight rise by any ordinary reading of the word.

More importantly, that is not the comparison E is making. E does not compare the new breed's feed cost to the traditional breed's cost. It compares the feed cost to the additional milk revenue the new breed generates over the traditional breed. The new breed gives twice the milk at the same price per litre, so that additional revenue equals the traditional breed's entire per-goat revenue. A feed cost "slightly greater" than that (the additional revenue) wipes out all of the extra revenue and then cuts into the profit that would've been made with just traditional goats. Ultimately, per adult female goat per month, profit ends up lower. That is precisely the result the passage reports.

B moves the other way. Revenue 2R, minus 30% for the loan, leaves 1.4R, still above the traditional breed's R. It cannot explain a drop of any size, substantial or otherwise.

On the AI point: we do use AI, and we use it for formatting. The reasoning in that post was worked out and typed by the person posting it, then run through AI to make it cleaner to read. It is read (by me, the poster) before it goes up.

If you would rather wait for MartyMurray on this one, that is entirely fair and you are welcome to. The answer is E, and I am confident his explanation will land in the same place.

gullyboy09
Hi egmat, kindly request you to not reply to my queries. You use AI and doesn't even read it before posting. I wish someone can block you here.

In your own example, if $9 is cost for tradition, and 9.5 for new breed, its not slightly above, its more than 5%, not just slightly above.

In a mountainous region where small-scale dairy farming has been practiced for centuries, agricultural extension officers recently documented an unexpected pattern: farms that had adopted a newly introduced breed of goat—one capable of producing roughly twice as much milk per month as the traditional local breed—reported substantially lower net profits per adult female goat per month than farms that continued raising the traditional breed, despite selling their milk at identical per-liter prices.

User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 43,689
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,928
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,689
Kudos: 85,097
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Honestly I don’t know that it is better with the AI formatting because so many people are anti-ai these days. The excessive formatting AI adds is increasing the post length and makes it less helpful.

I would perhaps instruct A.I. to make it brief.


egmat
Hi gullyboy09,

Taking the example first. $9 to $9.50 is a 5.5% rise in cost, and yes, that is technically more than 5%. But the example was not making a claim about how big the cost increase is. The example was showing what a small cost does to a thin margin: profit falls from $1 to $0.50, a 50% drop for a 5.5% increase in cost. I.e. a small movement in cost, large movement in profit. That is the mechanism, and 5.5% would still be considered a slight rise by any ordinary reading of the word.

More importantly, that is not the comparison E is making. E does not compare the new breed's feed cost to the traditional breed's cost. It compares the feed cost to the additional milk revenue the new breed generates over the traditional breed. The new breed gives twice the milk at the same price per litre, so that additional revenue equals the traditional breed's entire per-goat revenue. A feed cost "slightly greater" than that (the additional revenue) wipes out all of the extra revenue and then cuts into the profit that would've been made with just traditional goats. Ultimately, per adult female goat per month, profit ends up lower. That is precisely the result the passage reports.

B moves the other way. Revenue 2R, minus 30% for the loan, leaves 1.4R, still above the traditional breed's R. It cannot explain a drop of any size, substantial or otherwise.

On the AI point: we do use AI, and we use it for formatting. The reasoning in that post was worked out and typed by the person posting it, then run through AI to make it cleaner to read. It is read (by me, the poster) before it goes up.

If you would rather wait for MartyMurray on this one, that is entirely fair and you are welcome to. The answer is E, and I am confident his explanation will land in the same place.

User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 11,288
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 339
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,288
Kudos: 46,066
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let me pitch in...
You can eliminate B more convincingly than accept E, so let us look why B is not the correct answer.
1. The statement does not add up mathematically. Even though there is a drop in profit due to paying back of loan, it is not enough to result in loss. For each liter at say $1, traditional farms earn $1, while the new ones earn $1.4 ( 2 litres at $0.7)
2. Next reason,( although official explanation does not talk of).. In the para, we talk of all the farms that have adopted to new brees, with no exceptions. But in option B, we use word MOST, so it leaves a gap for why others that have not taken loan are also facing loss.

Now getting back to E..
You are absolutely correct on the word 'substantially' and have a very valid point. E is the answer because there is no other better option. Surely E could have been better worded and challenging.
gullyboy09
Hi MartyMurray, I was confused between B and E because of the word "substantially" in the passage. How come E can be the answer?
   1   2   3   4 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts