Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 02:28 It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 02:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
kavyamahajan9
Joined: 09 Jun 2021
Last visit: 16 Aug 2026
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
40
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 44
Kudos: 40
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sunshineeee
Joined: 17 May 2020
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 174
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 266
Location: Indonesia
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Amity007
Joined: 12 Sep 2025
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 266
Own Kudos:
492
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,856
Location: India
Schools: ISB
Products:
Schools: ISB
Posts: 266
Kudos: 492
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nuwaaanda
Joined: 15 Dec 2025
Last visit: 31 Aug 2026
Posts: 63
Own Kudos:
50
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 63
Kudos: 50
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here's what the stem tells us:
In response to alarming increase in pickpocketing at Karlarinda's airport, airport commission posted brightly-colored signs informing travellers to be aware of pickpockets. However, in months after this, the cases of pickpocketing saw a sharp rise. We have to find a reason to explain this paradox. Ideally pickpocketing cases should have reduced due to increased signage. Thus, our option has to explain this discrepancy. Let's look at the options

Option A: Even is 40% of travellers are unable to read the signs due to language differences, the rest 60% still can. This should have overall had a positive impact in reduction of pickpocketing. However, that is not the case. Hence, we can eliminate this option.

Option B: This abolition of sales tax, caused Karlarinda to be a luxury shopping destination 7 years ago. While this would increase the number of people carrying good amounts of money with them and hence the airport becoming a hotspot for pickpocketing, this was something that happened 7 years ago. The effect of this should have been gradual. Also it would have meant that even last year it was also a luxury shopping destination. Hence, there was not a big difference in the status of Karlarinda as a shopping destination before or after the signages were posted. Hence, this option does not give us any explanation. We can eliminate this.

Option C: This patrolling should have decreased the pickpocketing cases. However, they kept on increasing. Besides, there seems to be no relation between the signage and patrolling. We do not get any explanations on why the discrepancy. We can safely eliminate this option.

Option D: I went for this as my answer. This explains a relation between increased signage and how it caused an increase in pickpocketings. People looking at the signs instinctively checked the pockets where they kept their valuables thereby giving a signal to the pickpockets of where the valuables are located, thereby helping them rob the passengers. This explains the paradox and is our correct choice.

Option E: These belt packs, which are worn under the clothing of a traveller should make it more difficult for pickpockets to rob passengers, hence reducing the overall cases of pickpocketing. However, that is not the case. We can thus, eliminate this option
User avatar
ajain31
Joined: 09 Nov 2024
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 68
Location: United Kingdom
GPA: 71%
Posts: 70
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Notices were intended to reduce pickpocketing, but thefets increased even faster.

A. Some people cannot read the noticed, that woud merely make the notices s less effective- reject
B. increased tourisn could increase thefits but it does not directlt explain the effect of te notices
C. more police patrol should reduce theft
E. concealed belt packs should make theft mrore difficult

D. correct, after reading the warning traveler may instinctively touch or check the places where they keep their wallets, phones or other valuables, pickpockets watch them and mark who has valuables and who doesn't
User avatar
dhart
Joined: 02 Feb 2026
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 178
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 178
Kudos: 88
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A.) 40 percent people flying into kalarinda airport can't the language in which the signboards are wirtten
User avatar
yashsharma1
Joined: 18 Apr 2025
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
49
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q81 V82 DI83
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q81 V82 DI83
Posts: 75
Kudos: 49
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The structure of the question is as follows
The rate of pickpocketing was increasing in Karlarinda's main airport -> airport authority posted big signs to warn people of such thefts and to beware of pickpockets -> after this, the rate of such theft increased.
The question asks to explain the paradox. The paradox is that after taking measures to control the theft, the theft increased. What can explain this.

A. Even if 40% people are unable to read signs, the remaining can. This should have resulted in a slight decrease, or worst case scenario, maintained the theft rates as the same levels as before the notice. This statement weakens the argument.
B. Karlarinda has been a shopping destination for 7 years while the change has been effective for only a year. This cannot explain the increase in the theft post sign installations as this cause was same before and after the change.
C. This is completely irrelevant. That one day of patrol does not explain anything.
E. If people took measures to safeguard their valuables after seeing the notices, this would have led to a reduction in theft rates. Hence this statement is a weakener or goes against explaining the paradox.

D. Best of the lot IMO. If after reading the notice, everyone immediately checks their valuables, any pickpocket nearby will immediately get to know where that person is keeping their valuables, thereby making it easier for the pickpocket to target the valuables. Not the best but best of the lot explanation.
User avatar
patnaik1988
Joined: 05 Oct 2024
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 67
Posts: 78
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paradox Ques : We need to explain why even after posting notices in the public area of airport, pickpocketing increased even faster than before putting notices.
POE answer choice
A : Correct as it gives good reason for 40% of international travellers to be unable to read the notices and be aware of pickpocket outside airport.
B : It doesn't explain why the increase of pickpocketing after putting notices.
C: Doesn't explain why the increase
D: Doesn't explain the increase of pickpocketing after notices
E: against the evidence in the argument
Bunuel
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets. In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
twinkle2311
Joined: 05 Nov 2021
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 211
Own Kudos:
247
 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 9.041
Posts: 211
Kudos: 247
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need something that explains why the warnings led to more pickpocketing.

A doesn't really help. Some travelers not reading the notices doesn't explain the increase. Eliminate
B is out of scope. It explains why the airport is busy, not why thefts increased after the notices. Eliminate
C if anything, weakens. More police patrols should reduce thefts. Eliminate
D sounds good imo. Travelers may instinctively check where they keep their valuables after seeing the notices, making it easier for pickpockets to identify their targets. Keep
E weakens. Hidden belt packs should make theft harder. Eliminate

Ans : D
User avatar
puncuz
Joined: 03 Feb 2025
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 27
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Free Information: Alarming increase in the frequency of thefts --> Airport commission posted notices --> Theft increased!

A. If people can't read it should have no effect on theft rate.
B. Luxury shopping has no correlation with thefts that too increase in theft post notices.
C. If police began regular patrolling. Theft should decrease.
D. My answer. This makes sense. At airport notices are in multiple languages with signs. If people check valuables, this give theif valuable information about location of valuable items. causing inc in theft rate.
E. This should reduce if any.
User avatar
MANASH94
Joined: 25 Jun 2025
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 165
Own Kudos:
121
 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Schools: IIM IIM ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 525 Q80 V76 DI72
GPA: 2.9
Products:
Schools: IIM IIM ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 525 Q80 V76 DI72
Posts: 165
Kudos: 121
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pickpocket was increasing and Karlarinda's airport posted warning signs to reduce theft which increased theft even more.
Why something intended to reduce a problem led to its increase ?

A. Incorrect because people not able to read signs cant be the reasons of increase. If 60% could read it should have decreased also. Elimainate
B. Luxury Shopping doesn't seem to be a direct cause for increase in thefts. Eliminate.
C. More police protection should better the theft happening and not make it worse. Eliminate.
D. If people touch their valuables immediately after reading signs this could give an indication to the thieves to know where and who has valuables. Seems relatable. Correct Option.
E. Hidden packs should make thefts tougher and not easier.

IMO Ans should be D.
Bunuel
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets. In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
snorlax02
Joined: 22 Dec 2025
Last visit: 30 Jul 2026
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 39
Kudos: 24
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A - If true the thefts should decrease by some amount though small but not increase it
B - if true more purchases does imply more theft but doesn't have anything to do with the notices.
C - if true should decrease the thefts due to police fear not increase them
D - if true can increase thefts as thieves will be know bu human behaviour where the valuables are stored and can snatch them resulting in inreased theft
E - if true snatching things from belts should be difficult resulting in decreased theft

Ans - D
Bunuel
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets. In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
priyanka06
Joined: 10 Sep 2025
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
36
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Products:
Posts: 60
Kudos: 36
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D: Correct, it explains the paradox, as people unknowingly show thieves where the valuables are by touching that location.

A:- Incorrect, remaining 60 percent must have read, so atleast there must be some drop in theft, which is not there
B- incorrect, does not explain anything related to increase in theft
C: incorrect, it should actually decrease theft.
D: Incorrect, it should actually decrease theft

Bunuel
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets. In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
anushree01
Joined: 06 Apr 2024
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 253
Own Kudos:
91
 [1]
Given Kudos: 183
Products:
Posts: 253
Kudos: 91
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paradox -
Goal to notices - To reduce theft
Observed outcome - Theft increased in months after notices were put
Prethinking - SOmething must have led to an increase right after putting the notices
I can think that while people were standing to read those more pockets got picked
I can also think that maybe many visitors started coming but none read the notice etc etc

A - so what, still the no. should have not increased so out
B - in the seven years - irrlevant to the arg
C - so no. should not have increased - OUT
D - yeah sounds good & thus more picking pockets as it helped thieves spot more valubles - CORRECT
E - should have decreased then
Bunuel
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets. In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
gaurikhanna17
Joined: 16 Jan 2025
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
46
 [1]
Products:
Posts: 73
Kudos: 46
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO : D
A: This is not enough --- out
B: doesnt connect notices to the increase ---out
C: this makes the increase even more surprising --- out
D: THis explains the argument , increase --- it clearly explains why thefts increased after the notices
E: it predicts fewer thefts --- out
User avatar
DishaSaha
Joined: 03 Nov 2024
Last visit: 30 Aug 2026
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
49
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V75 DI78
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V75 DI78
Posts: 64
Kudos: 49
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Passage analysis,
Increase in frequency of pickpockets -> Airport commision puts warning posters.
Result: Frequenncy of theft increase in faster rate

Question type: Logical reasoning.

Answer choice analysis,
A. This option does not explains the faster increase rate. If they can not read the language then the rate would have remained same.
B. irrelevant option. The timeline does not matches the incident.
C. This actually broaden the logocal gap.
D. This option actually explains the situation best. This is the correct answer.
E. Irrelevant option. Since we are concerned about theft frequency not the amount of things during one theft.
Bunuel
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets. In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
redandme21
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 01 Aug 2026
Posts: 157
Own Kudos:
144
 [1]
Posts: 157
Kudos: 144
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A This explains why the notices might not help, but not why thefts increased.

B More shoppers could mean more valuables, but it does not connect the increase to the notices.

C More police patrols should discourage pickpocketing, not make it worse.

D Correct. Travelers checking their valuables reveal where pickpockets should look.

E Hidden belt packs would make valuables harder for pickpockets to steal.

IMO D
User avatar
GaganB
Joined: 30 Jan 2022
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q84 V82 DI74
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q84 V82 DI74
Posts: 28
Kudos: 12
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ans Choice D - As it talks about perceived threat (referring to the notices) and the tendency of people to physically look or grope for valuable belongings would provide the pickpockets surrounding the area an opportunity to steal the valuable belongings.

Option E talks about a situation where pickpockets will not succeed. Had it been a weaken question, this choice may have helped. But eliminate here.
Option A - Doesnt explain why robberies increased after notices.
Option B - Discuss 7 year trend, doesnt highlight the reason for increase in robberies after the notices.
Option C - Strengthens the opposite of the conclusion - the robberies should have decreased with increased patrolling.
User avatar
obedear
Joined: 05 Sep 2024
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
72
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Products:
Posts: 99
Kudos: 72
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Best answer: D

We are looking for a reason to resolve the apparent paradox why the notices or increased awareness of a potential pickpocket threat would actually increase the number of thefts occurring.

A - This does not explain why the number of thefts would increase at a faster rate.

B - This does not explain why the thefts would increase at a faster rate with respect to the notices being posted in the past year.

C - This does not explain it either; increased police presence would likely deter pickpockets.

D - Yes, if more people are indicating where they are keeping their valuable belongings, pickpockets could notice this and be more likely to commit theft. This works.

E - This would make it more likely that less thefts are committed due to valuable items being secured more safely.
User avatar
geocircle
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 27 Jul 2026
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
143
 [1]
Posts: 150
Kudos: 143
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A If many passengers cannot read the signs, the notices would simply have less effect.

B This may explain a general rise in theft, but not the sharper increase after the warnings appeared.

C Increased police presence would be expected to reduce thefts rather than increase them.

D Right answer. The warnings prompt people to touch their valuables, making them easier targets.

E It would help people hide their stuff, so that would cut thefts, not boost them.

Answer D
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts