Dear Friends,
Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
reply2spg
Neanderthals had a vocal tract that resembled those of the apes and so were probably without language, a shortcoming that may explain why they were supplanted by our own species.
(A) Neanderthals had a vocal tract that resembled those of the apes
(B) Neanderthals had a vocal tract resembling an ape’s
(C) The vocal tracts of Neanderthals resembled an ape’s
(D) The Neanderthal’s vocal tracts resembled the apes’
(E) The vocal tracts of the Neanderthals resembled those of the apes
Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended core meaning of this sentence is that Neanderthals had a vocal tract that resembled an ape’s, so Neanderthals were probably without language.
Concepts tested here: Meaning + Comparison• Comparison can only be made between similar things.
A: This answer choice incorrectly compares the singular "a vocal tract" to the plural "those of the apes"; please remember, a comparison can only be made between similar things. Further, Option A alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "those of the apes"; the construction of this phrase incorrectly implies that the Neanderthals' vocal tract resembled the vocal tracts of
certain, specific apes; the intended meaning is that the Neanderthals' vocal tract resembled the vocal tract of apes
in general.
B: Correct. This answer choice correctly compares the singular "a vocal tract" with the singular "an ape's (vocal tract)". Further, Option B uses the phrases "a vocal tract" and "an ape's (vocal tract)", conveying the intended meaning - that the Neanderthals had
a singular vocal tract that resembled the vocal tract of apes
in general. Moreover, Option B uses the clause "Neanderthals...were probably without language", conveying the intended meaning - that the Neanderthals
themselves probably had no language.
C: This answer choice incorrectly compares the plural "vocal tracts of Neanderthals" to the singular "an ape's (vocal tract)"; please remember, a comparison can only be made between similar things. Further, Option C alters the meaning of the sentence through the clause "The vocal tracts of Neanderthals...were without language"; the construction of this clause illogically implies that the
vocal tracts of Neanderthals probably had no language; the intended meaning is that the Neanderthals
themselves probably had no language.
D: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrases "The Neanderthal’s vocal tracts" and "the apes' (vocal tracts)"; the construction of this phrase incorrectly implies that the Neanderthals had
multiple vocal tracts that resembled the vocal tracts of
certain, specific apes; the intended meaning is that the Neanderthals had
a singular vocal tract that resembled the vocal tract of apes
in general. Moreover, Option D further alters the meaning of the sentence through the clause "The Neanderthal’s vocal tracts...were without language"; the construction of this clause illogically implies that the
vocal tracts of Neanderthals probably had no language; the intended meaning is that the Neanderthals
themselves probably had no language.
E: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "those of the apes"; the construction of this phrase incorrectly implies that the Neanderthals' vocal tracts resembled the vocal tracts of
certain, specific apes; the intended meaning is that the Neanderthals' vocal tracts resembled the vocal tract of apes
in general. Moreover, Option E further alters the meaning of the sentence through the clause "The vocal tracts...were without language"; the construction of this clause illogically implies that the
vocal tracts of Neanderthals probably had no language; the intended meaning is that the Neanderthals
themselves probably had no language.
Hence, B is the best answer choice.All the best!
Experts' Global Team