santoshparsewar
Here in this explanation, in (1) we not assuming that C lies on BF. But if C does not lie on BF, then triangle ABC can not form two RATs in rectangle ABEF. So, it goes without saying that C lies on EF and thus BE is its altitude. (since AB is the base). So statement 1 is alone sufficient.
Please correct me if i am wrong.
Hey Santhosh,
You're partly right! C has to lie on EF. Is that alone sufficient to say whether the triangle is equilateral? Certainly no! So this is not sufficient. See if the below explanation helps.
To prove the triangle is an equilateral, we need to prove all 3 sides of triangle are equal to the length of the rectangle.
Is AC=AB?
(1) BE = ( 3‾√AB)/2 - Nothing can be said as we don't know where the point C lies on EF. Not sufficient.
(2) Point C is the midpoint of EF
By Pythagoras Theorem, AC^2 = (AB/2)^2 + (BE)^2
AC^2 = AB^2/4 + BE^2 - We still can't tell whether AB=AC. So not sufficient.
From (1) lets substitute the value of BE in above equation and see where it takes us, we end up with AC^2 = AB^2. Hence AC=AB. If we take the other side of the triangle BC, we'll end up in the same result. Hence AC=BC=AB.
So the triangle is an equilateral one.
Hence C it is!
Cheers!