Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Status: swimming against the current
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 133
Location: Chennai, India

Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 24 May 2014, 09:09
Question Stats:
67% (02:17) correct 33% (02:55) wrong based on 338 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR, where T is the point on PR. If PQ = 3cm and QR = 6cm. Find QT A. 3/5 B. \(6\sqrt{5}\) C. \(\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\) D. 4 E. None
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by mailnavin1 on 12 Dec 2010, 05:28.
Last edited by Bunuel on 24 May 2014, 09:09, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61439

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Dec 2010, 06:23
mailnavin1 wrote: Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR, where T is the point on PR. If PQ = 3cm and QR = 6cm. Find QT
1. 3/5 2. 6\sqrt{5} 3. 6/\sqrt{5} 4. 4 5. None Look at the diagram: Attachment:
untitled.PNG [ 5.73 KiB  Viewed 59953 times ]
You can solve this question using the fact that: perpendicular to the hypotenuse will always divide the triangle into two triangles with the same properties as the original triangle, which means that all 3 triangles PQT, QRT and PRQ are similar. Now, as in similar triangles, corresponding sides are all in the same proportion then QT/QR=PQ/PR, as \(PR=\sqrt{3^2+6^2}=\sqrt{45}=3\sqrt{5}\) then \(\frac{QT}{6}=\frac{3}{3\sqrt{5}}\) > \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\). Or you can equate the area: \(area_{PQR}=\frac{1}{2}*PQ*QR=\frac{1}{2}*QT*PR\) > the same here: \(PR=3\sqrt{5}\) > \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\). Answer: C.
_________________




Director
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 600

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Dec 2010, 04:51
Find the hypotenuse by using the Pythagorean theorem.
\(3^2 + 6 ^2 = 3\sqrt{5}\)
Area of the right angled triangle = \(\frac{1}{2}*base*height\)
\(\frac{1}{2}*QR*PQ\)
Above can be equated with \(\frac{1}{2}*PR*QT\)
and QT can be found easily



Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 144

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jan 2011, 12:14
Hi Bunuel, I have a small doubt regarding similarity of triangles. Could you please explain the concept in little more detail or point me to a place where i can learn the concept.
eg lets say same diagram except now QT = 4 , PT = 3 .....we have to find TR = ?
Could you please explain this ?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61439

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jan 2011, 12:39
ajit257 wrote: Hi Bunuel, I have a small doubt regarding similarity of triangles. Could you please explain the concept in little more detail or point me to a place where i can learn the concept.
eg lets say same diagram except now QT = 4 , PT = 3 .....we have to find TR = ?
Could you please explain this ? If QT=4 and PT=3 > corresponding legs in QTR and in PTQ are in the same ratio: TR/QT=QT/PT > TR=16/3. You can use area equation approach if you are not comfortable with similarity.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 5

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Feb 2011, 15:27
Bunuel ,on your comment , corresponding legs in QTR and in PTQ are in the same ratio: TR/QT=QT/PT > TR=16/3. When I list out propertions, its coming TR=TP, Can you explain wat did I do wrong? Thanks!



Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 191
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 May 2011, 01:51
ajit257 wrote: Hi Bunuel, I have a small doubt regarding similarity of triangles. Could you please explain the concept in little more detail or point me to a place where i can learn the concept.
eg lets say same diagram except now QT = 4 , PT = 3 .....we have to find TR = ?
Could you please explain this ? You might want to refer to this, i found it very comprehensive, like a high school chapter http://www.nos.org/Secmathcour/eng/ch17.pdf



Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1207
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 May 2011, 06:59
1/2 * QT * PR = 1/2 * PQ * QR QT = 18/root(45) = 6/root(5) Answer  C
_________________
Formula of Life > Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant) GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 224

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2014, 08:58
Bunuel wrote: mailnavin1 wrote: Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR, where T is the point on PR. If PQ = 3cm and QR = 6cm. Find QT
1. 3/5 2. 6\sqrt{5} 3. 6/\sqrt{5} 4. 4 5. None Look at the diagram: Attachment: untitled.PNG You can solve this question using the fact that: perpendicular to the hypotenuse will always divide the triangle into two triangles with the same properties as the original triangle, which means that all 3 triangles PQT, QRT and PRQ are similar. Now, as in similar triangles, corresponding sides are all in the same proportion then QT/QR=PQ/PR, as \(PR=\sqrt{3^2+6^2}=\sqrt{45}=3\sqrt{5}\) then \(\frac{QT}{6}=\frac{3}{3\sqrt{5}}\) > \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\). Or you can equate the area: \(area_{PQR}=\frac{1}{2}*PQ*QR=\frac{1}{2}*QT*PR\) > the same here: \(PR=3\sqrt{5}\) > \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\). Answer: C. Hi Bunuel, I'm a little confused here. let me try to explain: If I equate the ratios: I get: QT/6 = 5/3Root5 I'm equating the ratios as such: the height of the QTR over the height of the the main triangle which equals, the hypotenuse of QTR to the hypotenuse of the main, which i 3 Root 5. Can you please clarify what the ratios actually are(height of one vs. base of another etc). It's a little confusing since the variables are repeated between the 3 triangles. My worry comes in because if I did this same ratio and I equated it to QTP, i would've gotten a completely different answer. I'm surely doing something wrong  perhaps in how i'm setting up the ratios?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61439

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2014, 09:23
russ9 wrote: Bunuel wrote: mailnavin1 wrote: Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR, where T is the point on PR. If PQ = 3cm and QR = 6cm. Find QT
1. 3/5 2. 6\sqrt{5} 3. 6/\sqrt{5} 4. 4 5. None Look at the diagram: Attachment: untitled.PNG You can solve this question using the fact that: perpendicular to the hypotenuse will always divide the triangle into two triangles with the same properties as the original triangle, which means that all 3 triangles PQT, QRT and PRQ are similar. Now, as in similar triangles, corresponding sides are all in the same proportion then QT/QR=PQ/PR, as \(PR=\sqrt{3^2+6^2}=\sqrt{45}=3\sqrt{5}\) then \(\frac{QT}{6}=\frac{3}{3\sqrt{5}}\) > \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\). Or you can equate the area: \(area_{PQR}=\frac{1}{2}*PQ*QR=\frac{1}{2}*QT*PR\) > the same here: \(PR=3\sqrt{5}\) > \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\). Answer: C. Hi Bunuel, I'm a little confused here. let me try to explain: If I equate the ratios: I get: QT/6 = 5/3Root5 I'm equating the ratios as such: the height of the QTR over the height of the the main triangle which equals, the hypotenuse of QTR to the hypotenuse of the main, which i 3 Root 5. Can you please clarify what the ratios actually are(height of one vs. base of another etc). It's a little confusing since the variables are repeated between the 3 triangles. My worry comes in because if I did this same ratio and I equated it to QTP, i would've gotten a completely different answer. I'm surely doing something wrong  perhaps in how i'm setting up the ratios? Corresponding sides are opposite the corresponding (equal) angles. Corresponding (equal) angles are marked in the diagram below: Similar questions to practice: inthediagramtotherighttrianglepqrhasarightangle169506.htmlinthefigureabovethecirclesarecenteredato00and162390.htmlinthefigureabovead4ab3andcd168366.htmlinthefigureabovesegmentsrsandturepresenttwopositi167496.htmlintrianglepqrtheangleq9pq6cmqr8cmxis161440.htmlintriangleabctotherightifbc3andac4then88061.htmlifarcpqraboveisasemicirclewhatisthelengthof144057.htmlintriangleabcifbc3andac4thenwhatisthe126937.htmlwhatarethelengthsofsidesnoandopintrianglenop130657.htmlinthediagramwhatisthelengthofab127098.htmllengthofac119652.htmlintheabovecircleab4bc6ac5andad6what106009.html
_________________



Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 224

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2014, 11:10
Bunuel wrote: russ9 wrote: Hi Bunuel,
I'm a little confused here. let me try to explain:
If I equate the ratios:
I get: QT/6 = 5/3Root5 I'm equating the ratios as such: the height of the QTR over the height of the the main triangle which equals, the hypotenuse of QTR to the hypotenuse of the main, which i 3 Root 5.
Can you please clarify what the ratios actually are(height of one vs. base of another etc). It's a little confusing since the variables are repeated between the 3 triangles. My worry comes in because if I did this same ratio and I equated it to QTP, i would've gotten a completely different answer. I'm surely doing something wrong  perhaps in how i'm setting up the ratios?
Corresponding sides are opposite the corresponding (equal) angles. Corresponding (equal) angles are marked in the diagram below: Similar questions to practice: inthediagramtotherighttrianglepqrhasarightangle169506.htmlinthefigureabovethecirclesarecenteredato00and162390.htmlinthefigureabovead4ab3andcd168366.htmlinthefigureabovesegmentsrsandturepresenttwopositi167496.htmlintrianglepqrtheangleq9pq6cmqr8cmxis161440.htmlintriangleabctotherightifbc3andac4then88061.htmlifarcpqraboveisasemicirclewhatisthelengthof144057.htmlintriangleabcifbc3andac4thenwhatisthe126937.htmlwhatarethelengthsofsidesnoandopintrianglenop130657.htmlinthediagramwhatisthelengthofab127098.htmllengthofac119652.htmlintheabovecircleab4bc6ac5andad6what106009.htmlI see where I was going wrong. I was only accounting to align the hypotenuse but I would switch the other two angles. Thanks for clarifying. One question to that extent: While aligning the ratios of the 3 triangles (2 inner and 1 outer), Side A/B of Inner #1 = Side A/B of Outer = Side A/B of Inner #2 right? What I mean by that is, I can equate any of the triangles to each other  not just inner/outer but also the two inner triangles because they ALL are similar triangles. Correct? About to start work on the links above. Thanks again.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61439

Re: Triangles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2014, 13:35
russ9 wrote: Bunuel wrote: russ9 wrote: Hi Bunuel,
I'm a little confused here. let me try to explain:
If I equate the ratios:
I get: QT/6 = 5/3Root5 I'm equating the ratios as such: the height of the QTR over the height of the the main triangle which equals, the hypotenuse of QTR to the hypotenuse of the main, which i 3 Root 5.
Can you please clarify what the ratios actually are(height of one vs. base of another etc). It's a little confusing since the variables are repeated between the 3 triangles. My worry comes in because if I did this same ratio and I equated it to QTP, i would've gotten a completely different answer. I'm surely doing something wrong  perhaps in how i'm setting up the ratios?
Corresponding sides are opposite the corresponding (equal) angles. Corresponding (equal) angles are marked in the diagram below: Similar questions to practice: inthediagramtotherighttrianglepqrhasarightangle169506.htmlinthefigureabovethecirclesarecenteredato00and162390.htmlinthefigureabovead4ab3andcd168366.htmlinthefigureabovesegmentsrsandturepresenttwopositi167496.htmlintrianglepqrtheangleq9pq6cmqr8cmxis161440.htmlintriangleabctotherightifbc3andac4then88061.htmlifarcpqraboveisasemicirclewhatisthelengthof144057.htmlintriangleabcifbc3andac4thenwhatisthe126937.htmlwhatarethelengthsofsidesnoandopintrianglenop130657.htmlinthediagramwhatisthelengthofab127098.htmllengthofac119652.htmlintheabovecircleab4bc6ac5andad6what106009.htmlI see where I was going wrong. I was only accounting to align the hypotenuse but I would switch the other two angles. Thanks for clarifying. One question to that extent: While aligning the ratios of the 3 triangles (2 inner and 1 outer), Side A/B of Inner #1 = Side A/B of Outer = Side A/B of Inner #2 right? What I mean by that is, I can equate any of the triangles to each other  not just inner/outer but also the two inner triangles because they ALL are similar triangles. Correct? About to start work on the links above. Thanks again. Yes, you can equate the ratios of corresponding sides in all three triangles.
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Posts: 256
Location: Netherlands
GPA: 4

Re: Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Oct 2018, 13:23
Hey guys,
What I don't understand, however, is why can we assume that the perpendicular segment QT cuts through angle PQR, could it not also be anywhere else along QR? And would the theorem (that a perpendicular to the hypotenuse creates three similar triangles) still work even if the line segment does not cut through the right angle (is not the height of the big triangle)?



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 14130

Re: Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2020, 14:03
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR
[#permalink]
18 Jan 2020, 14:03






