Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:22 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,290
 [14]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,290
 [14]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Aakash7
Joined: 07 Sep 2023
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Location: India
Schools: HEC Sept '26
GMAT Focus 1: 665 Q87 V81 DI81
GPA: 3.46
Schools: HEC Sept '26
GMAT Focus 1: 665 Q87 V81 DI81
Posts: 22
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,290
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,290
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pratiksha1998
Joined: 11 Aug 2021
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Goizueta '25
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V27
Schools: Goizueta '25
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V27
Posts: 101
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­I think the answer to the 3rd question should be yes, because basis the information given to me I can prvide an answer(light) to the question.
User avatar
riyasali
Joined: 09 Aug 2024
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 126
Posts: 26
Kudos: 26
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain as to why is the second one "yes"
User avatar
Cowtommi
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Last visit: 01 Dec 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 196
Posts: 18
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
riyasali
Can someone please explain as to why is the second one "yes"
'Amount of nutrient given' and 'rate of growth' is not directly proportional, however, we can certainly know if we give X amount, Y rate of growth.

Celie
X = 1.0 // Y = 2.4
X = 1.2 // Y = 3.5
X = 1.4 // Y = 3.0
X = 1.5 // Y = 4.5
X = 1.6 // Y = 3.3

Would giving a Celie vine 1.5 ml of nutrient per day produce a consistent rate of growth?
-> Yes we can answer this question as 4.5
User avatar
Feb2024
Joined: 27 Jan 2024
Last visit: 19 Oct 2025
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,543
Products:
Posts: 51
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Sajjad1994

Can you please provide the original answer to this question?

Thanking you in Advance!
User avatar
kirallight
Joined: 10 Mar 2024
Last visit: 23 Aug 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 6
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think for the 3rd the reason "NO" is the answer because, the author mentions that in last paragraph
Quote:
Since the nutrient solution and soil mixture is the same for every vine, there must be another explanation for the different rates of growth. Perhaps some other changing factor, such as light, makes the plant more or less able to absorb the nutrient, or possibly some elements of the nutrient are slightly toxic, and the different rates of growth for different amounts represent the shifting balance between the beneficial and harmful effects of the nutrient.
.

This perhaps and possibly feels like even the author is not confident that could be the correct explanation for the different growth rates.
User avatar
AmirSafwan
Joined: 26 Jan 2024
Last visit: 09 Dec 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 8
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Regarding 1st option.

The passage clearly states that →
Quote:
The rates of growth for each vine species are highly variable depending upon the amount of nutrient given

Why the answer is "No"?
User avatar
Cowtommi
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Last visit: 01 Dec 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
9
 [2]
Given Kudos: 196
Posts: 18
Kudos: 9
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AmirSafwan
Regarding 1st option.

The passage clearly states that →
Quote:
The rates of growth for each vine species are highly variable depending upon the amount of nutrient given

Why the answer is "No"?

1. Result : The rates of growth for each vine species are highly variable
Cause : the amount of nutrient given

2. Result : Variable rates of growth in the vines
Cause : ???

Two sentence seems similar but different.

Q2 is asking the cause of "Variable rates" not just "rates".



Hint is givin in the notes as,

First hint : " While administering one set amount produces one constant rate of growth, there is no clear trend that increasing the amount of nutrient given consistently increases or decreases the growth rate."

Second hint : "there must be another explanation for the different rates of growth"
User avatar
ARYAKASHANDILYA
Joined: 22 Feb 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 10
Given Kudos: 64
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
explain the second statement, why its a yes?
Sajjad1994
Attachment:
1.jpg
User avatar
Cowtommi
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Last visit: 01 Dec 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 196
Posts: 18
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ARYAKASHANDILYA
explain the second statement, why its a yes?
Sajjad1994
Attachment:
1.jpg

Every dose result in consistent rate of growth.

(While administering one set amount produces one constant rate of growth,)


Just growth rate is variable.


more amount = more growth (not true)

certain amount = certain growth (true)
User avatar
CorporateAsset
Joined: 25 Aug 2024
Last visit: 23 Jul 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 255
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 48
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AmirSafwan
Regarding 1st option.

The passage clearly states that →
Quote:
The rates of growth for each vine species are highly variable depending upon the amount of nutrient given

Why the answer is "No"?
The passage says:
Quote:
"Since the nutrient solution and soil mixture is the same for every vine, there must be another explanation for the different rates of growth. Perhaps some other changing factor, such as light, makes the plant more or less able to absorb the nutrient, or possibly some elements of the nutrient are slightly toxic..."
The passage speculates about possible causes.

'The rates of growth for each vine species are highly variable depending upon the amount of nutrient given.' That line states an association, not a cause. In science, correlation ≠ causation. So while amount of nutrient influences variability, the underlying cause of variability remains unknown.
User avatar
udayram_56
Joined: 04 Jul 2023
Last visit: 05 Aug 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
riyasali
Can someone please explain as to why is the second one "yes"

Hi riyasali,

This is mentioned in the first tab
Perhaps some other changing factor, such as light, makes the plant more or less able to absorb the nutrient
User avatar
SamMenon
Joined: 08 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 8.6
WE:Business Development (Technology)
Posts: 19
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
Attachment:
1.jpg

EXPLANATION:


  • Q1 (cause?): Not answered—only hypotheses given.
  • Q2 (Celie at 1.5 ml consistent?): Yes—notes explicitly say a fixed dose yields a constant rate; graph aligns.
  • Q3 (what affects absorption?): Not answered—mechanism not established.


Deep Diving and understanding each question:

1) “What causes the variable rates of growth in the vines?” → No

  • What we’re given:
    The notes say growth rates vary with the amount of nutrient, but also say there is no clear trend that “more nutrient ⇒ more growth” or the reverse.
  • About causes:
    The notes explicitly speculate about causes—e.g., “perhaps light makes the plant more or less able to absorb the nutrient,” or “some elements of the nutrient are slightly toxic,” and that different doses might reflect a balance of beneficial vs. harmful effects.
    These are hypotheses, not findings.
  • What the graph shows:
    It only shows, for each dose, the observed growth rate for Bromie/Celie. A graph of outcomes cannot establish the cause behind those outcomes.
  • Conclusion: We are not told which factor actually causes the variability; therefore the question cannot be answered.

2) “Would giving a Celie vine 1.5 ml of nutrient per day produce a consistent rate of growth?” → Yes

  • Key line in the notes:
    Administering one set amount produces one constant rate of growth.”
  • Apply to Celie at 1.5 ml/day:
    1.5 ml/day is a single, fixed dose. The notes state directly that for any fixed dose, the growth rate is constant/consistent.
  • Graph support:
    At 1.5 ml, the Celie (red) curve shows a single rate (≈ 4–4.5 cm/week), consistent with the “one dose → one constant rate” statement.
  • Conclusion: Under the same experimental conditions, a Celie vine given 1.5 ml/day would have a consistent (constant) growth rate. Hence Yes.
(Important nuance: “consistent” here means stable for that fixed dose over time within the experiment’s conditions; it does not mean the same across different doses.)

3) “What makes a plant more or less able to absorb nutrients?” → No

  • What we’re given:
    The notes again speculate: maybe light affects absorption; maybe slight toxicity at some doses; maybe a benefit–harm trade-off.
    None of these are measured or confirmed.
  • Graph limitations:
    The graph shows outcomes (growth rates) vs dose, not the underlying mechanism of absorption.
  • Conclusion: We are not told what actually makes the plants more or less able to absorb nutrients; so the question cannot be answered.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts