Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Carolyn and Brett - nicely explained what is the typical day of a UCLA student. I am posting below recording of the webinar for those who could't attend this session.
Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
Status: Out of my Mind , will be back in 2 minutes
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 12
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V25
WE: Other (Other)
Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Oct 2015, 03:28
Ans is C , as we do not know the exact positions of N and Q , in the question it is given that both lie to the right of M however we do not know whether N lie to the right of Q or Q lie to the right of N , so without knowing the exact position of N and Q we cannot ans the question. Therefore both statements are necessary for the conclusion.
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
WE: General Management (Computer Hardware)
Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Oct 2015, 08:38
1
eshan333 wrote:
N and Q , in the question it is given that both lie to the right of M however we do not know whether N lie to the right of Q or Q lie to the right of N , so without knowing the exact position of N and Q
From statement 1 we know that "Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ" -> 2MN = 3MQ it means that MN>MQ -> hence the position of Q is between M and N. ans:A
Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2015, 13:22
eshan333 wrote:
Ans is C , as we do not know the exact positions of N and Q , in the question it is given that both lie to the right of M however we do not know whether N lie to the right of Q or Q lie to the right of N , so without knowing the exact position of N and Q we cannot ans the question. Therefore both statements are necessary for the conclusion.
Hi eshan333,
While you ARE correct that we don't know the exact positions of N and Q, the question does NOT ask us for them (so you have to be careful about when you choose to stop working). The prompt asks for the RATIO of two lengths, NOT the exact measure of either of them. With a bit of 'playing around' and TESTing VALUES, you might find that you change your answer.
Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Feb 2016, 17:55
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.
Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ?
(1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N.
------|---------------------------------- line L
M
When you modify the original condition and the question, the que is ratio of QN:MQ, which is for 1) ratio and for 2) number(equation). In a case like this, it is most likely that ratio is the answer.
In 1),
------|--------|--------------------------|----- line L
M Q N
If MQ=2d, 2MN=3*2d, MN=3d and QN=d. Therefore, the que, QN:MQ=d:2d=1:2 is derived, which is unique and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is A.
-> Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
_________________
Re: Two points N and Q, not shown, be to the right of point M on line l.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Aug 2017, 18:47
HolaMaven wrote:
___________________________ line l M Two points N and Q, not shown, be to the right of point M on line l. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ?
I : Twice the length of MN is three times the length of MQ. II: Point Q is between points M and N
Hi... Required \(\frac{QN}{MQ}\)... Statement I.. 2*MN=3*MQ.... Clearly Q is between M and N.. So 2*(MQ+NQ)=3*MQ..... 2*MQ+2*NQ=3*MQ..... 2*NQ=MQ............\(\frac{NQ}{MQ}=\frac{1}{2}\) Sufficient Statement II.. Q is in between M and N Nothing much.. Insufficient
Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Sep 2017, 16:08
Given that N and Q are to the right of M, we can either have M---N---Q or M---Q----N. say MN=a, MQ= b and QM=c
Statement 1 says 2MN = 3MQ, i.e 2a=3b, therefore a > b and our line is M---Q----N. By observation, the line may look 1---3---4. This gives us 1/2 as the ratio of QN TO MQ.---Sufficient
Statement 1 says M---Q----N, we already know this somewhat in the prompt and its is not sufficient by itself without the info given in statement 1, for instance.
Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Aug 2018, 09:16
1
dave13 wrote:
vityakim@gmail.com wrote:
Image Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ?
(1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N.
My 2 cents. I think the difficulty of this question comes from uniqueness. We can solve this with simple algebra.
From con 1, we learn that 1) MQ + NQ = MN AND 2) 2MN = 3MQ
From here we can get MN MN=1.5MQ, now plug it back to 1)
MQ+NQ=1.5MQ MQ=0.5NQ and this is sufficient, hence A.
how did we get MN=1.5MQ
and why MQ+NQ equals 1.5MQ and not MN ?
and how we got MQ=0.5NQ
Math emergency needed:) i.e. Mathergency H ----- E-------L ------- P Anybody, somebody
From statement 1: \(2*MN = 3*MQ\) --> \(MN = \frac{3*MQ}{2}\) --> \(MN= 1.5* MQ\) (I) Since Q is between M and N, we have \(MN = MQ+QN\) (II) Combine equations (I) and (II) \(1.5*MQ = MQ+QN\) --> \(1.5*MQ-MQ = QN\) --> \(0.5*MQ=QN\)
Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Oct 2018, 09:50
OA explanation is pretty straight forward for this question:
(1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ . (2) Point Q is between points M and N .
(1) Given that twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ , it follows that the points are ordered from left to right as M , Q , and N . Thus, letting MQ = x and QN = y , it is given that 2(x + y) = 3x and the value of y x is to be determined. The given equation can be rewritten as 2 x + 2 y = 3 x , or 2y = x , or y/x=1/2= ; SUFFICIENT. (2) Given that Q is between M and N , the ratio of QN to MQ can be close to zero (if Q and N are close together and both far from M ) and the ratio of QN to MQ can be large (if M and Q are close together and both far from N ); NOT sufficient.
The correct answer is A; statement 1 alone is sufficient.
gmatclubot
Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ &nbs
[#permalink]
28 Oct 2018, 09:50
close
64% (01:31) correct 
)
H ----- E-------L ------- P Anybody, somebody 
