May 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Sunday, May 19th at 7 AM PT May 19 07:00 PM EDT  08:00 PM EDT Some of what you'll gain: Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Sunday May 19th at 7 PM ET May 20 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Practice the one most important Quant section  Integer Properties, and rapidly improve your skills. May 24 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. May 25 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55150

Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2015, 09:44
Question Stats:
64% (02:03) correct 36% (02:06) wrong based on 1760 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ? (1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N. Kudos for a correct solution.Attachment:
20151026_2043.png [ 955 Bytes  Viewed 20228 times ]
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________




Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 108

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2015, 12:45
Bunuel wrote: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ? (1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N. Kudos for a correct solution.Attachment: 20151026_2043.png (1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. => MN>MQ => Because both N, Q lie on the right of M => Q is between M and N 2MN = 3MQ => 2MQ + 2QN = 3MQ => MQ = 2QN => QN/MQ = 1/2 Sufficient (2) Point Q is between points M and N. Insufficient Ans: A




Intern
Status: Out of my Mind , will be back in 2 minutes
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 12
Location: India
WE: Other (Other)

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Oct 2015, 04:28
Ans is C , as we do not know the exact positions of N and Q , in the question it is given that both lie to the right of M however we do not know whether N lie to the right of Q or Q lie to the right of N , so without knowing the exact position of N and Q we cannot ans the question. Therefore both statements are necessary for the conclusion.



Intern
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
WE: General Management (Computer Hardware)

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Oct 2015, 09:38
eshan333 wrote: N and Q , in the question it is given that both lie to the right of M however we do not know whether N lie to the right of Q or Q lie to the right of N , so without knowing the exact position of N and Q From statement 1 we know that "Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ" > 2MN = 3MQ it means that MN>MQ > hence the position of Q is between M and N. ans:A



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 14154
Location: United States (CA)

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2015, 14:22
eshan333 wrote: Ans is C , as we do not know the exact positions of N and Q , in the question it is given that both lie to the right of M however we do not know whether N lie to the right of Q or Q lie to the right of N , so without knowing the exact position of N and Q we cannot ans the question. Therefore both statements are necessary for the conclusion. Hi eshan333, While you ARE correct that we don't know the exact positions of N and Q, the question does NOT ask us for them (so you have to be careful about when you choose to stop working). The prompt asks for the RATIO of two lengths, NOT the exact measure of either of them. With a bit of 'playing around' and TESTing VALUES, you might find that you change your answer. GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com*****Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!*****
Rich Cohen
CoFounder & GMAT Assassin
Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee www.empowergmat.com/



Manager
Joined: 12 Sep 2010
Posts: 230
Concentration: Healthcare, General Management

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Feb 2016, 14:43
camlan1990 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ? (1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N. Kudos for a correct solution.Attachment: 20151026_2043.png (1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. => MN>MQ => Because both N, Q lie on the right of M => Q is between M and N 2MN = 3MQ => 2MQ + 2QN = 3MQ=> MQ = 2QN => QN/MQ = 1/2 Sufficient (2) Point Q is between points M and N. Insufficient Ans: A Can you please explain how you go from "2MN = 3MQ" to "2MQ + 2QN = 3MQ"? Thank you.



CEO
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2625
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Feb 2016, 18:05
Samwong wrote: camlan1990 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ? (1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N. Kudos for a correct solution.Attachment: 20151026_2043.png (1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. => MN>MQ => Because both N, Q lie on the right of M => Q is between M and N 2MN = 3MQ => 2MQ + 2QN = 3MQ=> MQ = 2QN => QN/MQ = 1/2 Sufficient (2) Point Q is between points M and N. Insufficient Ans: A Can you please explain how you go from "2MN = 3MQ" to "2MQ + 2QN = 3MQ"? Thank you. You are given that 2MN=3MQ > MN=1.5MQ Now, this should tell you that the arrangement becomes: MQN such that MN = MQ+QN Again, as MN = 1.5 MQ > MQ+QN=1.5 MQ (as MN = MQ+QN ) Thus, you get, QN = 0.5 MQ > clearly you can now calculate the ratio QN/MQ . Thus this statement is sufficient. Hope this helps.



Manager
Joined: 12 Sep 2010
Posts: 230
Concentration: Healthcare, General Management

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Feb 2016, 01:02
Thanks Engr2012 for the explanation. That make sense now.



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 7349
GPA: 3.82

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Feb 2016, 18:55
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ? (1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N.  line L M When you modify the original condition and the question, the que is ratio of QN:MQ, which is for 1) ratio and for 2) number(equation). In a case like this, it is most likely that ratio is the answer. In 1),  line L M Q N If MQ=2d, 2MN=3*2d, MN=3d and QN=d. Therefore, the que, QN:MQ=d:2d=1:2 is derived, which is unique and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is A. > Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spareThe oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $149 for 3 month Online Course""Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test""Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2016
Posts: 214
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)

Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 May 2017, 03:20
I solved this by picking numbers (I know it may look like a overkill on DS but it helped me to know the positions of N and Q ) S1: I see 2 and 3 in the statement and pick a Number 6 for MN. 2(MN) = 3(MQ) 2(6) = 3(MQ) => MQ = 4 MQ=4 and MN=6 => QN = 2 QN/MQ = 2/4 = 1/2 S1 Suff. S2: Insuff. since we don't know the exact location of Q Answer : A
_________________



Current Student
Joined: 25 Feb 2017
Posts: 34
Location: Korea, Republic of
GPA: 3.67

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jul 2017, 15:38
Image Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ?
(1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N.
My 2 cents. I think the difficulty of this question comes from uniqueness. We can solve this with simple algebra.
From con 1, we learn that 1) MQ + NQ = MN AND 2) 2MN = 3MQ
From here we can get MN MN=1.5MQ, now plug it back to 1)
MQ+NQ=1.5MQ MQ=0.5NQ and this is sufficient, hence A.



Intern
Joined: 25 Mar 2016
Posts: 40
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
WE: Other (Other)

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jul 2017, 10:53
Bunuel wrote: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ? (1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N. Kudos for a correct solution.Attachment: 20151026_2043.png from statement 2 it seems that Q is mid point of MN and thus QN:MQ is 1:1.. I am confused now..can somebody please explain?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7671

Re: Two points N and Q, not shown, be to the right of point M on line l.
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Aug 2017, 19:47
HolaMaven wrote: ___________________________ line l M Two points N and Q, not shown, be to the right of point M on line l. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ?
I : Twice the length of MN is three times the length of MQ. II: Point Q is between points M and N Hi... Required \(\frac{QN}{MQ}\)... Statement I.. 2*MN=3*MQ.... Clearly Q is between M and N.. So 2*(MQ+NQ)=3*MQ..... 2*MQ+2*NQ=3*MQ..... 2*NQ=MQ............\(\frac{NQ}{MQ}=\frac{1}{2}\) Sufficient Statement II.. Q is in between M and N Nothing much.. Insufficient A
_________________



Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 100

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2017, 01:17
how can we know Q is between MN, Can it be like QMN ? then MN still longer than QM.



Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2016
Posts: 214
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2017, 23:39
Hello pclawong, It is not possible for the line to be QMN. Here's why. Stem says that N and Q are to the the right of M. Two cases are possible Case 1: MQN Case 2: MNQ Lets see which of the above two cases holds true S1 says  Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. Algebraically this means \(2MN = 3MQ\) \(MN = \frac{3}{2}* MQ\) Since \(\frac{3}{2}\) is a number greater than 1, we get \(MN > MQ\) This clearly means the Line HAS to look like this MQN Do let me know in case I was unable to give an answer. pclawong wrote: how can we know Q is between MN, Can it be like QMN ? then MN still longer than QM.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 03 May 2017
Posts: 91

Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Sep 2017, 17:08
Given that N and Q are to the right of M, we can either have MNQ or MQN. say MN=a, MQ= b and QM=c
Statement 1 says 2MN = 3MQ, i.e 2a=3b, therefore a > b and our line is MQN. By observation, the line may look 134. This gives us 1/2 as the ratio of QN TO MQ.Sufficient
Statement 1 says MQN, we already know this somewhat in the prompt and its is not sufficient by itself without the info given in statement 1, for instance.
Hence the answer is A.



VP
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1284

Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Aug 2018, 09:00
vityakim@gmail.com wrote: Image Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ?
(1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N.
My 2 cents. I think the difficulty of this question comes from uniqueness. We can solve this with simple algebra.
From con 1, we learn that 1) MQ + NQ = MN AND 2) 2MN = 3MQ
From here we can get MN MN=1.5MQ, now plug it back to 1)
MQ+NQ=1.5MQ MQ=0.5NQ and this is sufficient, hence A. how did we get MN=1.5MQ and why MQ+NQ equals 1.5MQ and not MN ? and how we got MQ=0.5NQ Math emergency needed:) i.e. Mathergency H  EL  P Anybody, somebody



Manager
Joined: 06 Nov 2016
Posts: 61
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.54

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Aug 2018, 10:16
dave13 wrote: vityakim@gmail.com wrote: Image Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ. What is the ratio of the length of QN to the length of MQ?
(1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ. (2) Point Q is between points M and N.
My 2 cents. I think the difficulty of this question comes from uniqueness. We can solve this with simple algebra.
From con 1, we learn that 1) MQ + NQ = MN AND 2) 2MN = 3MQ
From here we can get MN MN=1.5MQ, now plug it back to 1)
MQ+NQ=1.5MQ MQ=0.5NQ and this is sufficient, hence A. how did we get MN=1.5MQ and why MQ+NQ equals 1.5MQ and not MN ? and how we got MQ=0.5NQ Math emergency needed:) i.e. Mathergency H  EL  P Anybody, somebody From statement 1: \(2*MN = 3*MQ\) > \(MN = \frac{3*MQ}{2}\) > \(MN= 1.5* MQ\) (I)Since Q is between M and N, we have \(MN = MQ+QN\) (II)Combine equations (I) and (II)\(1.5*MQ = MQ+QN\) > \(1.5*MQMQ = QN\) > \(0.5*MQ=QN\) Hope it's clear.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2017
Posts: 184

Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Aug 2018, 10:27
Statement (1) M, N, Q < Not possible since MN > MQ
M, Q, N Knowing relationship between MN and MQ, you can get QN Sufficient
(2) M Q N No Info about spacing
Answer A



Intern
Joined: 04 May 2016
Posts: 5
Location: United States
GPA: 2.8

Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Oct 2018, 10:50
OA explanation is pretty straight forward for this question:
(1) Twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ . (2) Point Q is between points M and N .
(1) Given that twice the length of MN is 3 times the length of MQ , it follows that the points are ordered from left to right as M , Q , and N . Thus, letting MQ = x and QN = y , it is given that 2(x + y) = 3x and the value of y x is to be determined. The given equation can be rewritten as 2 x + 2 y = 3 x , or 2y = x , or y/x=1/2= ; SUFFICIENT. (2) Given that Q is between M and N , the ratio of QN to MQ can be close to zero (if Q and N are close together and both far from M ) and the ratio of QN to MQ can be large (if M and Q are close together and both far from N ); NOT sufficient.
The correct answer is A; statement 1 alone is sufficient.




Re: Two points, N and Q (not shown), lie to the right of point M on line ℓ
[#permalink]
28 Oct 2018, 10:50



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 21 posts ]



