Last visit was: 20 Jul 2024, 00:17 It is currently 20 Jul 2024, 00:17
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# Unlike all the other mammal species whose olfactory receptors, which

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2018
Posts: 327
Own Kudos [?]: 1586 [1]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2019
Posts: 134
Own Kudos [?]: 217 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2018
Status:Current student at IIMB
Affiliations: IIM Bangalore
Posts: 378
Own Kudos [?]: 406 [1]
Given Kudos: 325
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V26
GRE 1: Q162 V149
GPA: 3.6
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Intern
Joined: 12 Jan 2018
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 142 [0]
Given Kudos: 133
Re: Unlike all the other mammal species whose olfactory receptors, which [#permalink]
In option 'A' can 'which' refer to 'objects'?
From what I have understood, relative pronoun modifier need not always modify the noun preceding it. It depends on the context. It can jump prepositional phrase, like in this case 'to smell various objects', and refer to far away noun-'olfactory genes'.
Here, it would be illogical to say ' objects in turn detect their odor' .
Am I correct in my analysis?
What exactly is the issue with option A?

Originally posted by aarkay on 14 Jul 2019, 05:21.
Last edited by aarkay on 14 Jul 2019, 06:19, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Joined: 14 Nov 2018
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 66 [0]
Given Kudos: 94
Location: Austria
GMAT 1: 750 Q47 V46 (Online)
Re: Unlike all the other mammal species whose olfactory receptors, which [#permalink]
aarkay wrote:
In option 'A' can 'which' refer to objects?
From what I have understood relative pronoun modifier need not always modify the noun preceding it. It depends on the context. It can jump prepositional phrase, like in this case 'to smell various objects', and refer to far away noun-'olfactory genes.
Here, it would be illogical to say ' objects in turn detect their odor. Am I correct in my analysis?
What exactly is the issue with option A?

Whenever you see which, it’s a good idea to consider what it most logically modifies. Typically, it’s the closest noun. I’d argue that the noun-modifier "which" most directly modifies "objects" in this sentence. This makes it seem like the object is detecting the odor of the olfactory genes.

You’re correct that this does not have to be the case!

In this scenario, though, the original sentence includes “which in turn.” Even if “which” was modifying “olfactory genes,” which in turn logically shifts the focus.

Does this make sense?

Posted from my mobile device
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 01 May 2019
Posts: 45
Own Kudos [?]: 434 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Re: Unlike all the other mammal species whose olfactory receptors, which [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Jbrandl1 wrote:
aarkay wrote:
In option 'A' can 'which' refer to objects?
From what I have understood relative pronoun modifier need not always modify the noun preceding it. It depends on the context. It can jump prepositional phrase, like in this case 'to smell various objects', and refer to far away noun-'olfactory genes.
Here, it would be illogical to say ' objects in turn detect their odor. Am I correct in my analysis?
What exactly is the issue with option A?

Whenever you see which, it’s a good idea to consider what it most logically modifies. Typically, it’s the closest noun. I’d argue that the noun-modifier "which" most directly modifies "objects" in this sentence. This makes it seem like the object is detecting the odor of the olfactory genes.

You’re correct that this does not have to be the case!

In this scenario, though, the original sentence includes “which in turn.” Even if “which” was modifying “olfactory genes,” which in turn logically shifts the focus.

Does this make sense?

Posted from my mobile device

To add to this, relative modifiers can jump prepositional phrases, but only when those prepositional phrases are part of a noun phrase, and when the relative clause describes the noun phrase as a whole. So for instance, if I said, "the bench under the tree, which was recently painted", "which was recently painted" could describe "the tree" OR "the bench (under the tree)" — logically, it makes more sense for a bench to be recently painted than for a tree to be recently painted, so we would assume that "the bench (under the tree)" was the subject.

However, in this sentence, we do not have a noun phrase. The prepositional phrase "to smell various objects" does not describe "olfactory genes" — it describes the verb "use". So "which in turn detect their odor" cannot describe "olfactory genes (to smell various objects)" because it isn't a noun phrase, and relative clauses must describe either nouns or noun phrases that they are next to. So it has to describe noun "objects", which creates an illogical sentence.

While relative clauses are tricky, they still follow the rule that they must be next to the noun/noun phrase they describe. Relative clauses' ability to jump prepositional phrases only follows from the fact that they can describe noun phrases, and thus they can jump the prepositional phrase portion of the noun phrase to describe the subject of the noun phrase. However, if the prepositional phrase is not part of a noun phrase that the relative clause is describing, the relative clause cannot jump the prepositional phrase.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17522
Own Kudos [?]: 869 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: Unlike all the other mammal species whose olfactory receptors, which [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Unlike all the other mammal species whose olfactory receptors, which [#permalink]
1   2
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6984 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts