Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 19:19 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 19:19
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
shridhar786
Joined: 31 May 2018
Last visit: 08 Feb 2022
Posts: 322
Own Kudos:
1,753
 [1]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Posts: 322
Kudos: 1,753
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ccheryn
Joined: 15 Jun 2019
Last visit: 05 Nov 2022
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
221
 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Posts: 133
Kudos: 221
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
saukrit
Joined: 05 Jul 2018
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 378
Own Kudos:
425
 [1]
Given Kudos: 326
Status:Current student at IIMB
Affiliations: IIM Bangalore
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V26
GRE 1: Q162 V149
GPA: 3.6
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V26
GRE 1: Q162 V149
Posts: 378
Kudos: 425
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aarkay
Joined: 12 Jan 2018
Last visit: 17 Oct 2020
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 133
Posts: 39
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In option 'A' can 'which' refer to 'objects'?
From what I have understood, relative pronoun modifier need not always modify the noun preceding it. It depends on the context. It can jump prepositional phrase, like in this case 'to smell various objects', and refer to far away noun-'olfactory genes'.
Here, it would be illogical to say ' objects in turn detect their odor' .
Am I correct in my analysis?
What exactly is the issue with option A?
User avatar
jbrandl1
Joined: 14 Nov 2018
Last visit: 03 May 2024
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 94
Location: Austria
GMAT 1: 750 Q47 V46 (Online)
GMAT 1: 750 Q47 V46 (Online)
Posts: 32
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aarkay
In option 'A' can 'which' refer to objects?
From what I have understood relative pronoun modifier need not always modify the noun preceding it. It depends on the context. It can jump prepositional phrase, like in this case 'to smell various objects', and refer to far away noun-'olfactory genes.
Here, it would be illogical to say ' objects in turn detect their odor. Am I correct in my analysis?
What exactly is the issue with option A?

Whenever you see which, it’s a good idea to consider what it most logically modifies. Typically, it’s the closest noun. I’d argue that the noun-modifier "which" most directly modifies "objects" in this sentence. This makes it seem like the object is detecting the odor of the olfactory genes.

You’re correct that this does not have to be the case!

In this scenario, though, the original sentence includes “which in turn.” Even if “which” was modifying “olfactory genes,” which in turn logically shifts the focus.

Does this make sense?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
VeritasPrepErika
User avatar
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 01 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Apr 2020
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
475
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 45
Kudos: 475
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Jbrandl1
aarkay
In option 'A' can 'which' refer to objects?
From what I have understood relative pronoun modifier need not always modify the noun preceding it. It depends on the context. It can jump prepositional phrase, like in this case 'to smell various objects', and refer to far away noun-'olfactory genes.
Here, it would be illogical to say ' objects in turn detect their odor. Am I correct in my analysis?
What exactly is the issue with option A?

Whenever you see which, it’s a good idea to consider what it most logically modifies. Typically, it’s the closest noun. I’d argue that the noun-modifier "which" most directly modifies "objects" in this sentence. This makes it seem like the object is detecting the odor of the olfactory genes.

You’re correct that this does not have to be the case!

In this scenario, though, the original sentence includes “which in turn.” Even if “which” was modifying “olfactory genes,” which in turn logically shifts the focus.

Does this make sense?

Posted from my mobile device

To add to this, relative modifiers can jump prepositional phrases, but only when those prepositional phrases are part of a noun phrase, and when the relative clause describes the noun phrase as a whole. So for instance, if I said, "the bench under the tree, which was recently painted", "which was recently painted" could describe "the tree" OR "the bench (under the tree)" — logically, it makes more sense for a bench to be recently painted than for a tree to be recently painted, so we would assume that "the bench (under the tree)" was the subject.

However, in this sentence, we do not have a noun phrase. The prepositional phrase "to smell various objects" does not describe "olfactory genes" — it describes the verb "use". So "which in turn detect their odor" cannot describe "olfactory genes (to smell various objects)" because it isn't a noun phrase, and relative clauses must describe either nouns or noun phrases that they are next to. So it has to describe noun "objects", which creates an illogical sentence.

While relative clauses are tricky, they still follow the rule that they must be next to the noun/noun phrase they describe. Relative clauses' ability to jump prepositional phrases only follows from the fact that they can describe noun phrases, and thus they can jump the prepositional phrase portion of the noun phrase to describe the subject of the noun phrase. However, if the prepositional phrase is not part of a noun phrase that the relative clause is describing, the relative clause cannot jump the prepositional phrase.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,417
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,417
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
507 posts
363 posts