OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
Quote:
Unlike the Washington Monument, the structure of the San Jacinto Memorial Monument is not comprised entirely of stone, in spite of being taller.
A) the structure of the San Jacinto Memorial Monument is not comprised entirely of stone, in spite of [its] being taller
B) the San Jacinto Memorial Monument’s structure is not comprised entirely of stone, despite [ITS] being taller
C) the San Jacinto Memorial Monument is not comprised entirely of stone, although it is taller
D) the structure of the San Jacinto Memorial Monument is not comprised entirely of stone, although it is taller
E) the San Jacinto Memorial Monument is not comprised entirely of stone, in addition to [its] being taller
• Split #1: compare similar thingsThe word
unlike is a preposition and acts in the same way as the word
like does.
In the idiom
Unlike X, Y, the X- and Y-element must be parallel.
Unlike signals a comparison (a contrast) whose elements must be parallel.
In this case, on three occasions, the Washington Monument is compared to the
structure of the San Jacinto Monument.
Options A, B, and D incorrectly compare the Washington
Monument to the
structure of the San Jacinto Memorial Monument.
→ we can compare monument to monument or structure to structure, but not one of each.
Eliminate A, B, and D
• Split #2: the transition word should show contrast We need a contrasting "shift" word after "the S.J. Monument is not comprised entirely of stone."
In addition to is a long way to say
and.The point of the sentence is to show contrast:
unlike is one of GMAT writers' favorite ways to signal contrast.
Eliminate E.
The correct answer is C.
NOTESThis sentence does not strike me as terribly logical.
The Washington Monument is composed entirely of stone.
The S.J. Monument is not composed entirely of stone, although the S.U. Monument is taller. (?)
Does being made of stone typically make a building taller?
→ the
although part is tenuous
→ I am not a civil engineer. At all. But why
would something not made of stone be shorter than (not be taller than) something that IS made entirely of stone?
If you found yourself stuck between C and E and unable to decide which logic should carry the day, perhaps you remembered that concision is an issue.
The phrase
in addition to is unnecessarily long.
COMMENTS
neelanjan ,welcome to SC Butler.
These answers, whether ultimately correct, are well-reasoned.
jessiemjx and
TarunKumar1234 , I am bumping you both to Best Community Reply.
Nicely done, everyone.