GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Jun 2018, 12:23

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 548
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2013, 10:03
2
6
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

58% (01:01) correct 42% (01:10) wrong based on 567 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth century, many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood.

A) many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood
B) many scientists believed that phlogiston was an imaginary substance released by combustion and its properties were not fully understood
C) phlogiston was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood and which many scientists had believed was released by combustion
D) phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood, was believed by scientists to be released by combustion
E) many scientists had believed that phlogiston was released by combustion and was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood

MGMAT suggests "if the two actions are sequenced properly in the sentence, it is not necessary to use past perfect tense"..

in the sentence Until X proved, scientists had believed. Clearly suggests that " scientists believing was the first action" & Antoine proving is the action that followed it"

So do we really need "Had" in the Correct Answer Or is the answer still stands grammatically correct even after removing "had from it"
Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 810
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Re: Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2013, 10:58
3
RaviChandra wrote:
Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth century, many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood.

a) many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood
b) many scientists believed that phlogiston was an imaginary substance released by combustion and its properties were not fully understood
c) phlogiston was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood and which many scientists had believed was released by combustion
d) phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood, was believed by scientists to be released by combustion
e) many scientists had believed that phlogiston was released by combustion and was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood

MGMAT suggests "if the two actions are clearly sequenced in the sentence it is not necessary to use past perfect tense"..

in the sentence Until X proved, scientists had believed. Clearly suggests that " scientists believing was the first action" & Antoine proving is the action that followed it"

So do we really need "Had" in this question .

use of HAD is not wrong since all other options has gramatical errors.

if you have to choose between 2 options having the same intended meaning..but one uses HAD and one without HAD...then you van choose the one which dont have HAD.

TAKEAWAY: Use of HAD is not gramatically incorrect even if two actions are clearly sequenced.

a) many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood
CORRECT.

b) many scientists believed that phlogiston was an imaginary substance released by combustion and its properties were not fully understood
WRONG.
==incorrect parallelism.....we need ...THAT PHLOGISTON..........AND THAT its.....(THAT ismissing)

c) phlogiston was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood and which many scientists had believed was released by combustion
WRONG.
==> WHOSE clause and WHICH clause cannot be parallel...
==>WHICH normally refers to closest noun and followed by a comma or preposition(as per official question trend)

d) phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood, was believed by scientists to be released by combustion
WRONG.
==>PASSIVE CONSTRUCTION....

e) many scientists had believed that phlogiston was released by combustion and was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood
WRONG.
==>MEANING CHANGED: scientist BELIEVED.......1) P was released by combustion..+++ they also believed 2) was an imaginary substance.
scientist dint believed that it was an imaginary substance RATHER it was an imaginary substance....

Hope it helps.
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment

Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1079
Location: United States
Re: Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2013, 11:37
1
RaviChandra wrote:
Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth century, many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood.

a) many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood
b) many scientists believed that phlogiston was an imaginary substance released by combustion and its properties were not fully understood
c) phlogiston was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood and which many scientists had believed was released by combustion
d) phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood, was believed by scientists to be released by combustion
e) many scientists had believed that phlogiston was released by combustion and was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood

MGMAT suggests "if the two actions are sequenced properly in the sentence, it is not necessary to use past perfect tense"..

in the sentence Until X proved, scientists had believed. Clearly suggests that " scientists believing was the first action" & Antoine proving is the action that followed it"

So do we really need "Had" in the Correct Answer Or is the answer still stands grammatically correct even after removing "had from it"

Simple past vs Past perfect.
We use Simple Past if we give past events in the order in which they occured. However, when we look back from a certain time in the past to tell what had happened before, we use Past Perfect.

In this question, clearly we do not talk about sequence of events. However, we use the point - Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise - which happened in the past to look back other action (in the past) happened before it. Clearly, past perfect is correct.

ANALYZE THE QUESTION:

Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth century, many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood.

a) many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood
Correct. Past perfect + active voice --> good grammar.

b) many scientists believed that phlogiston was an imaginary substance released by combustion and its properties were not fully understood
Wrong. "its" refers to "combustion" or "substance" --> ambiguous.

c) phlogiston was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood and which many scientists had believed was released by combustion
Wrong. Passive voice "was released..." is not necessary.

d) phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood, was believed by scientists to be released by combustion
Wrong. "believed by X to be Y" --> not preferable in GMAT. (refer idiom chapter in MGMAT - sentence correction - page 150).

e) many scientists had believed that phlogiston was released by combustion and was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood
Wrong. Between A and E, A is better by using active voice. E, however, uses passive voice.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Intern
Joined: 21 Jun 2013
Posts: 41
Re: Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2013, 00:57
pqhai wrote:

b) many scientists believed that phlogiston was an imaginary substance released by combustion and its properties were not fully understood
Wrong. "its" refers to "combustion" or "substance" --> ambiguous.

I think 'its' refers to 'phlogiston' because 'phlogiston' is in the subject position in that clause, and so is 'its'. Please correct me if I am wrong.
2nd query: 'its' is a possessive pronoun, so should it not refer to a possessive subject?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1079
Location: United States
Re: Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2013, 22:50
1
vjns wrote:
pqhai wrote:

b) many scientists believed that phlogiston was an imaginary substance released by combustion and its properties were not fully understood
Wrong. "its" refers to "combustion" or "substance" --> ambiguous.

I think 'its' refers to 'phlogiston' because 'phlogiston' is in the subject position in that clause, and so is 'its'. Please correct me if I am wrong.
2nd query: 'its' is a possessive pronoun, so should it not refer to a possessive subject?

Hi vjns

In theory, every pronoun in a well-written sentence should clearly refer to ONE antecedent. If the pronoun MAY refer to more than one antecedent, pronoun ambiguity exists.

Let see B:
many scientist believed that X was Y released by Z and its properties were not fully understood.

So "its" refers to X, Y or Z? The sentence becomes very ambiguous.

Your though " 'its' refers to 'phlogiston' because 'phlogiston' is in the subject position in that clause" is not correct. Technically, "its' refers to phlogiston if there is a "that" before "and". So the sentence becomes: many scientist believed that phlogiston was..........and that its.................... ==> "its" refers to "phlogiston. But that's not the case in the question.

Your second query: We do not have any rule that says a possessive pronoun must refer to a possessive subject.
For example: Whenever a student calls, please take down his information. ==> subject: student; Pronoun "his" - a possessive form. But there is no problem here.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2015
Posts: 84
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Internet and New Media)
Re: Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2018, 23:50
For option A - Passive voice ( 'whose properties were not fully understood ' ) has been used like option E. So why has E been chosen as priority over A for POE ? Thanks in advance.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4323
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jun 2018, 08:34
1
Top Contributor
E is wrong not because of passive voice. E changes the meaning vastly. That phlogiston is an imaginary substance is a description of the author. E says that the scientists themselves believed it to be an imaginary stuff. One might see the difference in meaning between A and E.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 1755
Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jun 2018, 11:57
RaviChandra wrote:
Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth century, many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood.

A) many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood
B) many scientists believed that phlogiston was an imaginary substance released by combustion and its properties were not fully understood
C) phlogiston was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood and which many scientists had believed was released by combustion
D) phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood, was believed by scientists to be released by combustion
E) many scientists had believed that phlogiston was released by combustion and was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood

soumya170293 wrote:
For option A - Passive voice ( 'whose properties were not fully understood ' ) has been used like option E. So why has E been chosen as priority over A for POE ? Thanks in advance.

soumya170293 , as daagh notes, passive voice is not the issue.
Meaning distinguishes A from E. daagh wrote
Quote:
E says that the scientists themselves believed it to be an imaginary stuff.

The choice between options A and E is not a close call,
although the difference might be hard to see.

A) many scientists had believed that combustion released phlogiston, an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood

Many S had believed that C released P, [description of P] . . .

In A, phlogiston is followed by an appositive phrase [description of P]
that clarifies "phlogiston." This clarification makes sense. "Phlogiston" is a strange word.

The appositive does not suggest that the scientists
believed phlogiston to be imaginary.

E) many scientists had believed that phlogiston was released by combustion and was an imaginary substance whose properties were not fully understood

If the red typeface does not help much, try inserting words that are implied by the sentence.

Many S had believed that P was released by C and [BELIEVED THAT P] was an imaginary substance . . . .

Did the scientists believe that phlogiston was an imaginary substance?

On the one hand, if scientists believed that combustion was actually releasing phlogiston,
then they did not believe that phlogiston was "an imaginary substance."

On the other hand, if scientists believed that phlogiston WAS an imaginary substance,
then those scientists did not believe that combustion produced phlogiston.
(How does a real phenomenon produce an imaginary something?)

Option E, in other words, is logically inconsistent. Eliminate it.
Hope that helps.
_________________

In the depths of winter, I finally learned
that within me there lay an invincible summer.

Until Antoine Lavoisier proved otherwise in the eighteenth   [#permalink] 01 Jun 2018, 11:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by