It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 13:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Until quite recently, American economists have assumed that

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 297

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 7

Until quite recently, American economists have assumed that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2009, 04:04
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:34) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

16. Until quite recently, American economists have assumed that the unemployment rate being four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers.
(A) the unemployment rate being four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers
(B) should the unemployment rate be four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers
(C) were the unemployment rate four per cent, there is a rough balance between jobs and job seekers
(D) if the unemployment rate is four per cent, there is a rough balance between jobs and job seekers
(E) there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers when there is an unemployment rate that is four per cent
_________________

"CEO in making"

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 7

 Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes Veritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes Optimus Prep Discount Codes
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 248

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

21 May 2009, 04:17
IMO D

Until quite recently, American economists have assumed that the unemployment rate being four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers.
(A) the unemployment rate being four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers --> being is ungrammatical
(B) should the unemployment rate be four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers --> unidiomatic: among jobs and job seekers
(C) were the unemployment rate four per cent, there is a rough balance between jobs and job seekers --> inappropriate tense: were of if clause should be accompanied by past tense verb of then clause
(D) if the unemployment rate is four per cent, there is a rough balance between jobs and job seekers --> idiomatic: Between Noun and Noun
(E) there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers when there is an unemployment rate that is four per cent -->mentioned error

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 317

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 14

### Show Tags

24 May 2009, 16:51
Clear D for me , you can remove options with among , among is used for comparing more than 2
_________________

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 14

Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

27 May 2009, 18:49
tenaman10 wrote:
OA:D ...Why C is wrong ??

16. Until quite recently, American economists have assumed that the unemployment rate being four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers.
(A) the unemployment rate being four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers
(B) should the unemployment rate be four per cent, there is a rough balance among jobs and job seekers
(C) were the unemployment rate four per cent, there is a rough balance between jobs and job seekers

"C" seems to be wrong "were" is past tense "is" is present.
_________________

-talent is the desire to practice-

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 4

Re: if/should/were   [#permalink] 27 May 2009, 18:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by