Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 16:23 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 16:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
aaron22197
Joined: 22 May 2007
Last visit: 18 Sep 2008
Posts: 146
Own Kudos:
806
 [11]
Posts: 146
Kudos: 806
 [11]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aaron22197
Joined: 22 May 2007
Last visit: 18 Sep 2008
Posts: 146
Own Kudos:
806
 [3]
Posts: 146
Kudos: 806
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Giampa
Joined: 22 Jun 2017
Last visit: 05 Jun 2023
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Location: Italy
GPA: 3.64
Posts: 11
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
RMD007
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Last visit: 08 Jun 2019
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
201
 [2]
Given Kudos: 80
Status:Countdown Begins...
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
Posts: 236
Kudos: 201
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
paolo_giordanello
Someone could enlighten what support the answer B at the question 2?

Quote:

Until recently, nearly everyone thought of intelligence as a single entity that could be measured by a simple IQ test. In 1983, however, Dr. Howard Gardner, a professor of education at Harvard University, introduced his theory of multiple intelligences. Today, there are two major schools of thought on intelligence. Despite extensive and ongoing research, scientists have been unable to prove definitively one theory over the other.

As per the first paragraph, until recently there was only one theory - Single Intelligence. But recently, there are new observations/theories added and scientists are unable to prove either.

Means the traditional view is challenged.

Also, All the other options are either not mentioned or extremes.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
goofytiwari69
Joined: 13 Jun 2018
Last visit: 29 Dec 2019
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 21
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
why is answer for question3 not A but E??
User avatar
dabaobao
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Jun 2022
Posts: 570
Own Kudos:
1,639
 [1]
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 570
Kudos: 1,639
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
goofytiwari69
why is answer for question3 not A but E??

3. According to the passage, the term “positive manifold” can be most closely identified with which of the following?

(A) The correlation between IQ and reaction time

(B) The observation that individuals with speech impairment are able to demonstrate other forms of intelligence

(C) The relationship between IQ and performance on standardized tests

(D) The three intelligences proposed by Dr. Robert Sternberg

(E) Neural processing speed

Answer:
"that neural processing speed is equivalent to the one general intelligence. " This supports E. While info in choice A is given in the passage but that does not answer this question: "the term “positive manifold” can be most closely identified with".

Therefore, answer is E.
User avatar
iamdivs
Joined: 14 Jan 2020
Last visit: 24 Feb 2022
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Posts: 72
Kudos: 20
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
6:43 minutes in total, 4/4 correct

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
deep31993
Joined: 16 Dec 2018
Last visit: 24 Jan 2022
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,304
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V37
WE:Investment Banking (Finance: Venture Capital)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V37
Posts: 69
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please post a better explanation for question no.3?

And I believe Q4 is way beyond the passage in the sense to come to an answer c requires extra assumptions. Do you think such questions get tested in GMAT?
User avatar
bM22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 716
Own Kudos:
784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,316
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 716
Kudos: 784
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
deep31993
Can someone please post a better explanation for question no.3?

And I believe Q4 is way beyond the passage in the sense to come to an answer c requires extra assumptions. Do you think such questions get tested in GMAT?


Hi deep31993,
Let me know if this helps:


3. According to the passage, the term “positive manifold” can be most closely identified with which of the following?

(A) The correlation between IQ and reaction time

(B) The observation that individuals with speech impairment are able to demonstrate other forms of intelligence

(C) The relationship between IQ and performance on standardized tests

(D) The three intelligences proposed by Dr. Robert Sternberg

(E) Neural processing speed


Correct Answer - E,
Explanation: as mentioned in the end of the 2nd paragraph: " suggesting that neural processing speed is equivalent to the one general intelligence", this option most closely relates to the idea of one general intelligence, known as positive manifold .
Option A - Incorrect, as mentioned in the passage: "Another argument in support of the general intelligence theory is the strong positive correlation between intelligent quotient, or IQ, as measured by psychometric tests, and reaction time. Individuals with faster reaction times or neural processing speeds have higher IQ's, suggesting that neural processing speed is equivalent to the one general intelligence.", implies that reaction time is equivalent to neural processing speed, and that is equivalent to the one general intelligence, making E a better choice.
Option B - incorrect, since it supports the theory of multiple intelligences.
Option C - incorrect, not mentioned in the passage.
Option D - incorrect, it talks about multiple intelligence model, and positive manifold is associated with single intelligence model.



For Question 4, try the process of elimination, and you will easily be able to eliminate all options except C.

4. The author of this passage would most likely agree with which of the following?

(A) The theory of multiple intelligences is relatively new and untested. - Incorrect, as its not true, we can easily infer this from the passage.

(B) Within the next decade, discoveries about the human brain will resolve the debate about intelligence. - Incorrect, as not mentioned in the passage. Out of scope for us.

(C) Dr. Sternberg’s theory would be strengthened by the discovery of biological evidence for his conclusions. - Correct, most apt of all, as mentioned in the passage: "Gardner’s theory is supported primarily by biological evidence. By studying individuals with paralysis, speech impairment, or other disabilities, Gardner has been able to identify specific parts of the brain associated with different physical and cognitive skills. Sternberg’s model relies on observations of real-life situations.". We can infer that biological evidences would only strengthen his observation.

(D) The theory of multiple intelligences is undermined by disagreements among its proponents as to the number of intelligences. - Incorrect, as the theories have been tested and are supported by Biological evidences.

(E) There is stronger biological evidence in favor of the single-intelligence model than of the theory of multiple intelligences.- Incorrect, as we know about the biological evidence in favour of multiple intelligences, but we cannot comment anything about the single intelligence model.
avatar
12AG
Joined: 23 May 2020
Last visit: 06 Jan 2021
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In Q4, I was stuck between option A and C. I can agree on the fact that the passage does not suggest that multiple intelligence theory is untested but I could not find relevant evidence in the passage for option C. On one hand in Q2, the answer is not the option which says that "there is no biological evidence for Sternberg theory". As we know that Sternberg theory is based majorly on real life situations but excisistence of bo=iological evidence is unknown. So why is the answer to Q4 c?
avatar
akshaymalpani
Joined: 10 Jan 2020
Last visit: 08 Dec 2021
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
Posts: 20
Kudos: 5
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
4. The author of this passage would most likely agree with which of the following?

(A) The theory of multiple intelligences is relatively new and untested.
- Maybe the theory is new - it did come after the single entity theory - but is it untested? The third paragraph, last few lines, talks about one scientist (Dr. Sternberg) who did test the theory on students in Brazil. He looked at performances in school tests and in practical real-life situational tests. A is out

(B) Within the next decade, discoveries about the human brain will resolve the debate about intelligence.
- Nope. The first paragraph talks about how these two theories exist and there is no clear winner in the debate between the two but nowhere in the passage is there a mention about any future resolution of the debate. B is out.

(C) Dr. Sternberg’s theory would be strengthened by the discovery of biological evidence for his conclusions.
- Hold on to this. We know Dr. Sternberg and Dr. Gardner are two scientists who subscribe to the multiple intelligence theory but differ on the number of intelligences. Dr. Gardner bases his argument of seven/eight intelligences on biology and Dr. Sternberg bases his argument of three intellgences on real-life situations. Now think about it, if Dr. Sternberg could show that his theory has a basis in both biology and real-life situations then would you say that his theory has an edge over Dr. Gardner's theory, one that is based only on biology? You'd say that Dr. Sterberg has a stronger case because he can cite two reasons whereas Dr. Gardner can cite only one. Correct.

(D) The theory of multiple intelligences is undermined by disagreements among its proponents as to the number of intelligences.
- There is a difference, yes. But does it say anywhere that it is undermined? The author does not express that sentiment anywhere. D is out.

(E) There is stronger biological evidence in favor of the single-intelligence model than of the theory of multiple intelligences.
- Paragraph 2 talks about correlation between IQ and reaction times and paragraph 3 talks about Dr Gardner's biological explanation for his theory. However, no where does the author place on over the other. Therefore E is out.

Answer: C
User avatar
tanu11
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Apr 2019
Last visit: 27 Oct 2025
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
question 2 .
option d: street children in Brazil would not do well on standard IQ tests
in support of option d
passage:
but cannot pass a school math class, which requires analytical intelligence.(last para)
those who do well on verbal tests also do well on mathematics tests, and vice versa. (2nd para).
why is option d wrong ?
avatar
RiteshGadave
Joined: 24 Aug 2020
Last visit: 20 Jan 2025
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I feel both the options B and C are correct for question 2.Please can someone explain why B is correct and not C ?RMD007
User avatar
bM22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 716
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,316
Location: India
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tanu11
question 2 .
option d: street children in Brazil would not do well on standard IQ tests
in support of option d
passage:
but cannot pass a school math class, which requires analytical intelligence.(last para)
those who do well on verbal tests also do well on mathematics tests, and vice versa. (2nd para).
why is option d wrong ?

Hi tanu11, RiteshGadave,

Let me know if you still have doubts.

Official Explanation

2. It can be inferred from the passage that ?


Explanation

Your answer to an inference question must be supported by evidence from the passage. Remember that Reading Comprehension inferences rarely go far beyond what is stated in the passage, so you should infer as little as possible.

Evaluate the Answer Choices:

Choice (A) The author describes two theories of intelligence, but does not indicate that one is more prominent than the other.

Answer Choice (B) CORRECT. In the first paragraph, the author states that “Until recently, nearly all researchers thought of intelligence as a single entity.” This traditional view was challenged when Howard Gardner introduced a theory of multiple intelligences in 1983.

Choice (C) Although the passage suggests that Sternberg’s model is supported primarily by “observations of real-life situations,” we cannot be sure that there is no biological evidence for his model.

Choices(D) This answer choice is tempting because the author cites Sternberg’s observation that street children in Brazil exhibit relatively low analytical intelligence. However, it is unclear from the passage how Sternberg’s concept of analytical intelligence correlates with IQ.

Choices(E) The passage does not mention school teachers, nor give any indication of their views on intelligence.

Answer: B


Thanks.
avatar
RiteshGadave
Joined: 24 Aug 2020
Last visit: 20 Jan 2025
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But we have Q4 C has correct answer which states that, there is no biological evidence for Sternberg’s model.
User avatar
bM22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 716
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,316
Location: India
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RiteshGadave
But we have Q4 C has correct answer which states that, there is no biological evidence for Sternberg’s model.


Hi RiteshGadave,

The previous reply was for your query to question 2.

For Question 4 please refer to my reply here:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/until-recently-nearly-everyone-thought-of-intelligence-as-a-single-en-66351.html#p2551866


Let me know if you still have doubts.

Thanks.
User avatar
tanu11
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Apr 2019
Last visit: 27 Oct 2025
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bm2201
tanu11
question 2 .
option d: street children in Brazil would not do well on standard IQ tests
in support of option d
passage:
but cannot pass a school math class, which requires analytical intelligence.(last para)
those who do well on verbal tests also do well on mathematics tests, and vice versa. (2nd para).
why is option d wrong ?

Hi tanu11, RiteshGadave,

Let me know if you still have doubts.

Official Explanation


2. It can be inferred from the passage that ?


Explanation

Your answer to an inference question must be supported by evidence from the passage. Remember that Reading Comprehension inferences rarely go far beyond what is stated in the passage, so you should infer as little as possible.

Evaluate the Answer Choices:

Choice (A) The author describes two theories of intelligence, but does not indicate that one is more prominent than the other.

Answer Choice (B) CORRECT. In the first paragraph, the author states that “Until recently, nearly all researchers thought of intelligence as a single entity.” This traditional view was challenged when Howard Gardner introduced a theory of multiple intelligences in 1983.

Choice (C) Although the passage suggests that Sternberg’s model is supported primarily by “observations of real-life situations,” we cannot be sure that there is no biological evidence for his model.

Choices(D) This answer choice is tempting because the author cites Sternberg’s observation that street children in Brazil exhibit relatively low analytical intelligence. However, it is unclear from the passage how Sternberg’s concept of analytical intelligence correlates with IQ.

Choices(E) The passage does not mention school teachers, nor give any indication of their views on intelligence.

Answer: A


Thanks.
thank you for the explanation. cleared the query.
there is a mistake in your post . at the bottom the ans A is written but the ans is B
User avatar
bM22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 716
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,316
Location: India
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tanu11
bm2201
tanu11
question 2 .
option d: street children in Brazil would not do well on standard IQ tests
in support of option d
passage:
but cannot pass a school math class, which requires analytical intelligence.(last para)
those who do well on verbal tests also do well on mathematics tests, and vice versa. (2nd para).
why is option d wrong ?

Hi tanu11, RiteshGadave,

Let me know if you still have doubts.

Official Explanation


2. It can be inferred from the passage that ?


Explanation

Your answer to an inference question must be supported by evidence from the passage. Remember that Reading Comprehension inferences rarely go far beyond what is stated in the passage, so you should infer as little as possible.

Evaluate the Answer Choices:

Choice (A) The author describes two theories of intelligence, but does not indicate that one is more prominent than the other.

Answer Choice (B) CORRECT. In the first paragraph, the author states that “Until recently, nearly all researchers thought of intelligence as a single entity.” This traditional view was challenged when Howard Gardner introduced a theory of multiple intelligences in 1983.

Choice (C) Although the passage suggests that Sternberg’s model is supported primarily by “observations of real-life situations,” we cannot be sure that there is no biological evidence for his model.

Choices(D) This answer choice is tempting because the author cites Sternberg’s observation that street children in Brazil exhibit relatively low analytical intelligence. However, it is unclear from the passage how Sternberg’s concept of analytical intelligence correlates with IQ.

Choices(E) The passage does not mention school teachers, nor give any indication of their views on intelligence.

Answer: A


Thanks.
thank you for the explanation. cleared the query.
there is a mistake in your post . at the bottom the ans A is written but the ans is B

Fixed it.
Thanks. :)
avatar
Harshjha001
Joined: 14 Sep 2019
Last visit: 08 Oct 2021
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 60
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone help me with this ....

Q3 -: According to the passage, the term “positive manifold” can be most closely identified with which of the following?

Isn't this part of the passage mentioning the answer -: "Perhaps the most convincing evidence in support of this theory is the fact that individuals who perform well on tests of one cognitive ability also perform well on tests of a second cognitive ability. For example, those who do well on verbal tests also do well on mathematics tests, and vice versa."
(C).The relationship between IQ and performance on standardized tests

Q4 -: The author of this passage would most likely agree with which of the following?

"The theory of multiple intelligences asserts that there is more than one type of intelligence. Proponents of this model differ on the number of intelligences."
(D) The theory of multiple intelligences is undermined by disagreements among its proponents as to the number of intelligences.

Can someone please explain me why we have to draw assumptions when the answers are directly stated ? What am i missing here ?
User avatar
bM22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 716
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,316
Location: India
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Harshjha001
Can someone help me with this ....

Q3 -: According to the passage, the term “positive manifold” can be most closely identified with which of the following?

Isn't this part of the passage mentioning the answer -: "Perhaps the most convincing evidence in support of this theory is the fact that individuals who perform well on tests of one cognitive ability also perform well on tests of a second cognitive ability. For example, those who do well on verbal tests also do well on mathematics tests, and vice versa."
(C).The relationship between IQ and performance on standardized tests

Q4 -: The author of this passage would most likely agree with which of the following?

"The theory of multiple intelligences asserts that there is more than one type of intelligence. Proponents of this model differ on the number of intelligences."
(D) The theory of multiple intelligences is undermined by disagreements among its proponents as to the number of intelligences.

Can someone please explain me why we have to draw assumptions when the answers are directly stated ? What am i missing here ?



Hi Harshjha001,

Quote:
Q3 -: According to the passage, the term “positive manifold” can be most closely identified with which of the following?

Isn't this part of the passage mentioning the answer -: "Perhaps the most convincing evidence in support of this theory is the fact that individuals who perform well on tests of one cognitive ability also perform well on tests of a second cognitive ability. For example, those who do well on verbal tests also do well on mathematics tests, and vice versa."
(C).The relationship between IQ and performance on standardized tests

For Question 3: The lines: "Perhaps the most convincing evidence in support of this theory is the fact that individuals who perform well on tests of one cognitive ability also perform well on tests of a second cognitive ability.", do not imply a relationship between IQ and performance on standardized tests. It is simply presented as an evidence for Single intelligence model, which is synonymous to the "Positive Manifold" in question, but author does mention a relationship between IQ and reaction time, mentioned in the passage as:

"Another argument in support of the general intelligence theory is the strong positive correlation between intelligent quotient, or IQ, as measured by psychometric tests, and reaction time. Individuals with faster reaction times or neural processing speeds have higher IQs, suggesting that neural processing speed is equivalent to the one general intelligence."


Quote:
Q4 -: The author of this passage would most likely agree with which of the following?

"The theory of multiple intelligences asserts that there is more than one type of intelligence. Proponents of this model differ on the number of intelligences."
(D) The theory of multiple intelligences is undermined by disagreements among its proponents as to the number of intelligences.

Can someone please explain me why we have to draw assumptions when the answers are directly stated ? What am i missing here ?

True that :"The theory of multiple intelligences asserts that there is more than one type of intelligence. Proponents of this model differ on the number of intelligences." , but author never mentions that this model undermines his theory.

We don't need to draw assumptions when the answers are either directly stated or can be inferred from the passage. Here, though information is present in the passage, it's is presented as an information weakening the theory of multiple intelligences, which it is not, thus making D incorrect. For such questions we need to see how are the views or facts mentioned in the passage are presented in the options.

Hope This Helps.
Thanks.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17304 posts
189 posts