Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 13:18 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 13:18
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gabriel87
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Last visit: 12 Dec 2014
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
121
 [9]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 23
Kudos: 121
 [9]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,571
 [10]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
 [10]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
gabriel87
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Last visit: 12 Dec 2014
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
121
 [2]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 23
Kudos: 121
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
evdo
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Last visit: 02 Aug 2018
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 101
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GPA: 3.33
WE:Consulting (Non-Profit and Government)
Posts: 43
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
keep

B) no intellectual unequivocally declared that human evil was from a source in
need had before declared, out

C)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that human evil had its source in
"had its source in" seems wordy, out

D)no intellectual unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
need had before declared, out

E)no intellectual had an unequivocal declaration that the source of human evil was
need a perfect tense, out
avatar
gmat2015p
Joined: 27 Dec 2014
Last visit: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
Products:
Posts: 43
Kudos: 233
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gabriel87
Until Rousseau no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.

A)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
B) no intellectual unequivocally declared that human evil was from a source in
C)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that human evil had its source in
D)no intellectual unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
E)no intellectual had an unequivocal declaration that the source of human evil was


Experts, can you please help me understand why past perfect is absolutely required in this sentence?

Until Roussesu - indicates that there are events that happened before that time.. so should use of past perfect be optional?
avatar
sheolokesh
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Last visit: 06 Jun 2015
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
58
 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 50
Kudos: 58
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I approached it this way.

Until Rousseau means that Rousseau declared after something happened or not happened. ie, a past event happened before Rousseau declared his opinion.

A past event happening before another should have "HAD" in it... Option A,C,E has it.

declaration in E is not a right word. Its better to have "declared"

Double HAD in option C is not a right delivery.

A remains. In A, the statment gives a proper delivery of idea that Until Rousseau declared, no intellectual had unequivocally(clearly) declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.

no intellectual had unequivocally(clearly) declared is a first action. So it has a HAD in it.
Rousseau declared is a second action. So it is in simple past tense.

Please correct me if I am wrong..
avatar
gmat2015p
Joined: 27 Dec 2014
Last visit: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
Products:
Posts: 43
Kudos: 233
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sheolokesh
I approached it this way.

Until Rousseau means that Rousseau declared after something happened or not happened. ie, a past event happened before Rousseau declared his opinion.

A past event happening before another should have "HAD" in it... Option A,C,E has it.

declaration in E is not a right word. Its better to have "declared"

Double HAD in option C is not a right delivery.

A remains. In A, the statment gives a proper delivery of idea that Until Rousseau declared, no intellectual had unequivocally(clearly) declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.

no intellectual had unequivocally(clearly) declared is a first action. So it has a HAD in it.
Rousseau declared is a second action. So it is in simple past tense.

Please correct me if I am wrong..

Thank you sheolokesh :) Now I understand why the past perfect tense is required.
avatar
730score
Joined: 11 Oct 2016
Last visit: 03 Sep 2019
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gabriel87
Until Rousseau no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.

A)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
B) no intellectual unequivocally declared that human evil was from a source in
C)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that human evil had its source in
D)no intellectual unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
E)no intellectual had an unequivocal declaration that the source of human evil was


Isnt C a more direct way of saying the statement?
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 17 Dec 2025
Posts: 5,904
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,904
Kudos: 5,446
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
730score
gabriel87
Until Rousseau no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.

A)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
B) no intellectual unequivocally declared that human evil was from a source in
C)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that human evil had its source in
D)no intellectual unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
E)no intellectual had an unequivocal declaration that the source of human evil was

Isnt C a more direct way of saying the statement?

There's nothing wrong with the original sentence...

Until Rousseau no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.

Original sentence has the following correct usages -

1. Use of Past perfect ( With sentence involving Until )
2. Correct subject Verb agreement ( The source - Was )


Correct answer but be (A) , source in is not good in my opinion...
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,571
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
730score
gabriel87
Until Rousseau no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.

A)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
B) no intellectual unequivocally declared that human evil was from a source in
C)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that human evil had its source in
D)no intellectual unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
E)no intellectual had an unequivocal declaration that the source of human evil was


Isnt C a more direct way of saying the statement?

No, on the contrary, A is more direct: The source of X is Y.
The following construction would be considered awkward in GMAT: X has its source in Y.
User avatar
sobby
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Last visit: 24 Jan 2022
Posts: 441
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 441
Kudos: 396
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
730score
gabriel87
Until Rousseau no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.

A)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
B) no intellectual unequivocally declared that human evil was from a source in
C)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that human evil had its source in
D)no intellectual unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
E)no intellectual had an unequivocal declaration that the source of human evil was


Isnt C a more direct way of saying the statement?

No, on the contrary, A is more direct: The source of X is Y.
The following construction would be considered awkward in GMAT: X has its source in Y.

Hi sayantanc2k.
confused with the usage of Had.
Word "Until" is enough to show sequence of events.

Why "D" is incorrect.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,464
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For more insight into the question of past perfect usage, one may look into this
before-its-independence-in-1947-britain-ruled-india-as-a-109904.html
User avatar
rishabhdxt
Joined: 27 Mar 2014
Last visit: 10 May 2020
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
Posts: 50
Kudos: 117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gabriel87
Until Rousseau no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.

A)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
B) no intellectual unequivocally declared that human evil was from a source in
C)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that human evil had its source in
D)no intellectual unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
E)no intellectual had an unequivocal declaration that the source of human evil was


Until Rousseau requires use of past perfect 'had+verb' ; b,d,e are out

'its' do not have antecedent ; C is out

A is correct
User avatar
trungnguyenn
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Last visit: 12 Dec 2018
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:General Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Posts: 26
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Until Rousseau no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was social conditioning.

Pay attention to last words "social conditioning" we could eliminate B and C since "...source in social conditioning" is wrong.

"Until Rousseau" requires past perfect tense. D and E are out.

Left only A correct.


A)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was --- Correct
B) no intellectual unequivocally declared that human evil was from a source in
C)no intellectual had unequivocally declared that human evil had its source in
D)no intellectual unequivocally declared that the source of human evil was
E)no intellectual had an unequivocal declaration that the source of human evil was
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,404
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,404
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
495 posts
358 posts