Last visit was: 13 Jan 2025, 12:22 It is currently 13 Jan 2025, 12:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 13 Jan 2025
Posts: 4,517
Own Kudos:
31,873
 [39]
Given Kudos: 667
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert reply
Posts: 4,517
Kudos: 31,873
 [39]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
25
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bagdbmba
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Last visit: 10 Dec 2021
Posts: 1,006
Own Kudos:
4,119
 [2]
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 1,006
Kudos: 4,119
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
septwibowo
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Last visit: 17 Nov 2023
Posts: 194
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 285
Concentration: Marketing, Social Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.65
WE:Marketing (Education)
Products:
Posts: 194
Kudos: 187
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhik1502
Joined: 09 Oct 2016
Last visit: 18 Mar 2022
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 154
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 3.6
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 129
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In below sentence

Tom needs a gym instructor like James.

Logically I agree James could be compared with both Tom & Gym Instructor.

But as mentioned in Takeaways, in absence of comma before like it refers to object of preceding sentence. SO why it can't refer to Gym Instructor only, in absence of comma, without any ambiguity or reference to Tom.

Is it like rules mentioned in Takeaways being preceded by logic. And we should always look out for logic based verification first instead of rule based (from Takeaways).
User avatar
Vishlesh
Joined: 04 Oct 2020
Last visit: 21 Jul 2023
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 85
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here, doesn't this statement - "I want to be an investment banker, like my brother" mean that investment banker and 'my brother' are compared. From what I've read noun closest to the like noun is compared.

If not, how would we express if we want to compare investment banker and 'my brother'. ??

So, what is the difference in meaning in both of these sentences of yours?
Kim needs a tennis trainer, like her brother.
Like her brother, Kim needs a tennis trainer.

Please help!!!

The example quoted by you says whether we use comma in the start or end of the sentence, it will always compare to the subject of the sentence. Please clear this doubt of Like+comma??
egmat

:
egmat
‘Like’ is a comparison marker that often causes confusion in terms of its usage on the GMAT. Let’s understand how to use ‘like’ correctly. We’ll start with a few simple examples and then discuss some official questions.

The correct usage of ‘like’ in a sentence ensures that the following four conditions are met:
• ‘Like’ shows similarity between two noun entities.
• ‘Like’ presents a logical comparison.
• ‘Like’ is followed by a noun/pronoun. (It cannot be followed by a clause)
• The sentence conveys the meaning clearly. There should be no ambiguity in the meaning.

Let’s have a look at a few questions. In the following sentences, try to identify:
• Which of these sentences are correct/incorrect?
• What are the meanings conveyed by these sentences?
• Which entities are being compared?

1. The US needs a president like Lincoln.

2. Mike can play the guitar like a professional guitarist.

3. Tom needs a gym instructor like James.

4. Like my brother, I want to be an investment banker.



Now, let’s discuss the above sentences one by one:

1. The US needs a president like Lincoln.
This sentence tells us that the US needs a president similar to Lincoln The comparison is between ‘president’ and ‘Lincoln’. So, the compared entities are logically parallel. The sentence conveys perfectly clear meaning without any ambiguity.
Let’s take one more example:
• India needs an opening batsman like Sachin Tendulkar.
Here the comparison is between ‘opening batsman’ and ‘Sachin Tendulkar’. The meaning is that India needs an opening batsman who is similar to Sachin Tendulkar: i.e. the comparison is between “an opening batsman” and “Sachin Tendulkar”. There is no ambiguity here.


2. Mike can play the guitar like a professional guitarist.
This sentence compares ‘Mike’ with ‘a professional guitarist’. It conveys the meaning that Mike is as good at playing the guitar as a professional guitarist is.


3. Tom needs a gym instructor like James.
This sentence presents two possible comparisons and hence it has two possible meanings.
Tom needs a gym instructor like James.
Meaning 1: Tom needs a gym instructor who is like James: i.e. a gym instructor similar to James. Here, the compared entities are ‘gym instructor’ and ‘James’.

Tom needs a gym instructor like James.
Meaning 2: Tom needs a gym instructor as James does. Here, the compared entities are ‘Tom’ and ‘James’. So, this meaning indicates that both Tom and James need gym instructors.

Since this sentence does not convey one clear meaning, it is incorrect.
Why does this sentence convey an ambiguous meaning? What is the difference between this sentence and the first two sentences?
In the first sentence there is only one logical comparison possible i.e. between ‘president’ and ‘Lincoln’. The comparison between ‘the US’ and ‘Lincoln’ is not possible so there is no ambiguity.
Similarly, in the second sentence there is only one logical comparison possible i.e. the comparison between ‘Mike’ and ‘a professional guitarist’. Since neither of them can be compared with ‘guitar’, there is no ambiguity.
Now, in the third sentence both the comparisons are logically possible, and hence it presents an ambiguous meaning.


4. Like my brother, I want to be an investment banker.
In the above sentence, the comparison is between ‘I’ and ‘my brother’. My brother wants to be an investment banker, and so do I. This same meaning can be conveyed if we say:
• I want to be an investment banker, like my brother. (‘I’ compared with ‘investment banker’)


Let’s take a couple more examples:
Unlike the honey bees, the masonry bees prefer to live in solitude.
Here, the comparison is between ‘honey bees’ and ‘masonry bees’. While ‘like’ shows similarity between two noun entities, ‘unlike’ shows the dissimilarity.
This sentence tells us that the masonry bees prefer to live in solitude. This characteristic is unlike the honey bees i.e. the honey bees don’t prefer to live in solitude.

Lisa takes care of her siblings like a mother does.
This sentence is incorrect since ‘like’ is followed by a clause (a mother does). The correct way to write this sentence using ‘like’ is:
• Lisa takes care of her siblings like a mother.
‘Lisa’ is compared to ‘a mother’. Lisa takes care of her siblings in the same way a mother does.



Now, try to apply this learning on the following official questions:

• Like Auden, the language of James Merrill is chatty, arch, and conversational- given to complex syntactic flights as well as to prosaic free-verse strolls.

A. Like Auden, the language of James Merrill
B. Like Auden, James Merrill's language
C. Like Auden's, James Merrill's language
D. As with Auden, James Merrill's language
E. As is Auden's the language of James Merrill


• Unlike auto insurance, the frequency of claims does not affect the premiums for personal property coverage, but if the insurance company is able to prove excessive loss due to owner negligence, it may decline to renew the policy.

A. Unlike auto insurance, the frequency of claims does not affect the premiums for personal property coverage,
B. Unlike with auto insurance, the frequency of claims do not affect the premiums for personal property coverage,
C. Unlike the frequency of claims for auto insurance, the premiums for personal property coverage are not affected by the frequency of claims,
D. Unlike the premiums for auto insurance, the premiums for personal property coverage are not affected by the frequency of claims,
E. Unlike with the premiums for auto insurance, the premiums for personal property coverage is not affected by the frequency of claims,


TAKE AWAYS
1. When ‘like + noun’ is separated from the sentence by a comma, the comparison is between the subject of the sentence and the noun following ‘like’.

2. When ‘like + noun’ is not separated from the sentence by a comma, the comparison is between the object of the sentence and the noun that follows ‘like’. Note that this usage is correct only when there is no ambiguity about which two nouns are being compared.


Hope this helps!

Deepak
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7209 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14513 posts