Last visit was: 20 Jun 2025, 14:54 It is currently 20 Jun 2025, 14:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 June 2025
Posts: 102,214
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,961
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,214
Kudos: 734,013
 [25]
Kudos
Add Kudos
25
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 June 2025
Posts: 102,214
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,961
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,214
Kudos: 734,013
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rumikido3
Joined: 30 Sep 2015
Last visit: 28 Feb 2017
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
WE:Marketing (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
Posts: 45
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,395
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,395
Kudos: 15,453
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rumikido3
In the question V02-22 about inference, it is true that there is a correlation between expectation and taste. What could damage this correlation? What if the experiment is done with a group of people with a biased preference towards vinegar??

In the second paragraph, it is stated that "A previous survey had found that most cola drinkers thought vinegar would worsen the taste". But the passage never says that the 300 participants in the experiment have the same opinion about vinegar worsen the taste. So, What if members of all three test groups have a positive previous preference for the cola with vinegar, then the experiment has proven that expectation has no influence on taste.

I think Option A should be reworded:
A) majority in all three test groups preferred "cola extra" to standard cola, regardless of whether they were told it contained a secret ingredient.

Please, I appreciate in advance your comments about my observation.

"A previous survey had found that most cola drinkers thought vinegar would worsen the taste"...based on this statement you may take it to be true that when a number of cola drinkers are selected, most of them would have the same opinion. The same is true for the 300 participants as well. There is no reason to assume that they are exceptions.
User avatar
Rumikido3
Joined: 30 Sep 2015
Last visit: 28 Feb 2017
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
WE:Marketing (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
Posts: 45
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks a lot sayantanc2k !

Now, I see my mistake. Still a lot to learn.
User avatar
nathalie1107
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Last visit: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 10
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question 3 is so confusing to me.
I read many passages that have a transition in focus in the later paragraph. Especially, an opening conclusion often appears in the last paragraph.
Based on what we can say that the passage just focus on several aspects of the experiment with the influence of expectation on taste?
I personally think that this question is not a good question...
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,395
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,395
Kudos: 15,453
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nathalie1107
Question 3 is so confusing to me.
I read many passages that have a transition in focus in the later paragraph. Especially, an opening conclusion often appears in the last paragraph.
Based on what we can say that the passage just focus on several aspects of the experiment with the influence of expectation on taste?
I personally think that this question is not a good question...

Please elaborate which option you think fits better and why you think so.
User avatar
nathalie1107
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Last visit: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 10
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks sayantanc2k.
I think except D, all answers are possible.
(a) The test group responses prove there may be a market for colas blended with vinegar. --> This sentence can start a paragraph discussing how the new finding can make change to business decisions.
(b) The test group responses corroborate previous research with brain imaging, which had also shown that expectation can change the physical trace of neural activity. --> This sentence continues strengthening the effect of expectation but on a wider aspect.
(c) This experiment illustrates the need for further research before the impact of expectation on taste can be stated conclusively. --> This sentence can opens a paragraph about the limitation of the experiment.
(e) This experiment offers useful information to marketers, who may adjust brand labels to indicate changes in product formula. --> How the experiments can be useful in marketing practices.
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,395
Own Kudos:
15,453
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,395
Kudos: 15,453
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nathalie1107
Thanks sayantanc2k.
I think except D, all answers are possible.
(a) The test group responses prove there may be a market for colas blended with vinegar. --> This sentence can start a paragraph discussing how the new finding can make change to business decisions.
(b) The test group responses corroborate previous research with brain imaging, which had also shown that expectation can change the physical trace of neural activity. --> This sentence continues strengthening the effect of expectation but on a wider aspect.
(c) This experiment illustrates the need for further research before the impact of expectation on taste can be stated conclusively. --> This sentence can opens a paragraph about the limitation of the experiment.
(e) This experiment offers useful information to marketers, who may adjust brand labels to indicate changes in product formula. --> How the experiments can be useful in marketing practices.

In GMAT RC, the first paragraph (or the first 2-3 of lines of the first paragraph) often summarizes the theme of the passage - hence it is recommended that one starts reading the passage slowly and carefully and then increase the speed (skimming through) as soon as the theme is understood.

a. Here the theme is about the hypothesis that "expectation can alter the experience of taste itself" - from this, the passage seems to be one on psychology/ science rather than on marketing (the italicized part shows how the thought process goes while one reads the beginning of an RC passage) . Hence it is unlikely that the passage would shift towards marketing abruptly.

c. Nothing in the experiment indicates that there is further requirement of tests. If there were some opposing results, one in favor of the hypothesis and one against, then it could be said that there is a requirement of further experiment.

e. As in a, this passage does not seem to be one on marketing, but on psychology.

Please let me know if you are not convinced with the above reasoning.
User avatar
nathalie1107
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Last visit: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 10
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi sayantanc2k,

Could you please clarify in more detailed why the next paragraph should only focus on psychology aspects, not marketing ones?
I still think that this passage is about applied psychology into business practice (in this case, marketing in specific). You can see the passage opens with psychologists and marketers. In addition, the experiment is also about a specific type of blind tests which is used in both marketing to understand customers' tastes and psychology to understand human activities' paradigm. That is why, for me, A & E look even better than B.

Thanks,
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,395
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,395
Kudos: 15,453
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nathalie1107
Hi sayantanc2k,

Could you please clarify in more detailed why the next paragraph should only focus on psychology aspects, not marketing ones?
I still think that this passage is about applied psychology into business practice (in this case, marketing in specific). You can see the passage opens with psychologists and marketers. In addition, the experiment is also about a specific type of blind tests which is used in both marketing to understand customers' tastes and psychology to understand human activities' paradigm. That is why, for me, A & E look even better than B.

Thanks,

Your reasoning is logical - The mention of "marketers" and the type of experiment carried out indeed indicate that the passage could definitely be about the link between marketing and psychology. However from the tone of the passage it is more likely that the experiment is carried out to prove the hypothesis ( expectation can alter the experience of taste itself) than to market vinegar blended colas. Hence option A is not the correct answer.

Nonetheless after seeing your reasoning, I agree that option E is a probable answer. Therefore we have modified option B and E to remove the ambiguity. Thank you for your feedback.
User avatar
nathalie1107
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Last visit: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 10
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
nathalie1107
Hi sayantanc2k,

Could you please clarify in more detailed why the next paragraph should only focus on psychology aspects, not marketing ones?
I still think that this passage is about applied psychology into business practice (in this case, marketing in specific). You can see the passage opens with psychologists and marketers. In addition, the experiment is also about a specific type of blind tests which is used in both marketing to understand customers' tastes and psychology to understand human activities' paradigm. That is why, for me, A & E look even better than B.

Thanks,

Your reasoning is logical - The mention of "marketers" and the type of experiment carried out indeed indicate that the passage could definitely be about the link between marketing and psychology. However from the tone of the passage it is more likely that the experiment is carried out to prove the hypothesis ( expectation can alter the experience of taste itself) than to market vinegar blended colas. Hence option A is not the correct answer.

Nonetheless after seeing your reasoning, I agree that option E is a probable answer. Therefore we have modified option B and E to remove the ambiguity. Thank you for your feedback.

I think there should be problems with option A, but cannot figure them out clearly. Could you please let me know how the tone affect the incorrectness of option A?
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,395
Own Kudos:
15,453
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,395
Kudos: 15,453
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nathalie1107
sayantanc2k
nathalie1107
Hi sayantanc2k,

Could you please clarify in more detailed why the next paragraph should only focus on psychology aspects, not marketing ones?
I still think that this passage is about applied psychology into business practice (in this case, marketing in specific). You can see the passage opens with psychologists and marketers. In addition, the experiment is also about a specific type of blind tests which is used in both marketing to understand customers' tastes and psychology to understand human activities' paradigm. That is why, for me, A & E look even better than B.

Thanks,

Your reasoning is logical - The mention of "marketers" and the type of experiment carried out indeed indicate that the passage could definitely be about the link between marketing and psychology. However from the tone of the passage it is more likely that the experiment is carried out to prove the hypothesis ( expectation can alter the experience of taste itself) than to market vinegar blended colas. Hence option A is not the correct answer.

Nonetheless after seeing your reasoning, I agree that option E is a probable answer. Therefore we have modified option B and E to remove the ambiguity. Thank you for your feedback.

I think there should be problems with option A, but cannot figure them out clearly. Could you please let me know how the tone affect the incorrectness of option A?

The first paragraph introduces a hypothesis, and then the two paragraphs describe an experiment to support the hypothesis. The experiment is introduced to support a general concept rather than to market a particular product mentioned in the experiment. If the central theme of the passage were marketing one particular product (vinegar enriched colas), then there would generally be a clear summary in the opening or the ending paragraph.

If you are not convinced, please post again.
User avatar
nathalie1107
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Last visit: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 10
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's very clear now. Many thanks, sayantanc2k.
avatar
Kinjo17
Joined: 17 Nov 2016
Last visit: 02 Aug 2018
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Location: United States
Schools: Fuqua '25
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.3
Schools: Fuqua '25
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 11
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
Rumikido3
In the question V02-22 about inference, it is true that there is a correlation between expectation and taste. What could damage this correlation? What if the experiment is done with a group of people with a biased preference towards vinegar??

In the second paragraph, it is stated that "A previous survey had found that most cola drinkers thought vinegar would worsen the taste". But the passage never says that the 300 participants in the experiment have the same opinion about vinegar worsen the taste. So, What if members of all three test groups have a positive previous preference for the cola with vinegar, then the experiment has proven that expectation has no influence on taste.

I think Option A should be reworded:
A) majority in all three test groups preferred "cola extra" to standard cola, regardless of whether they were told it contained a secret ingredient.

Please, I appreciate in advance your comments about my observation.

"A previous survey had found that most cola drinkers thought vinegar would worsen the taste"...based on this statement you may take it to be true that when a number of cola drinkers are selected, most of them would have the same opinion. The same is true for the 300 participants as well. There is no reason to assume that they are exceptions.

Hi sayantanc,

I also thought about what Rumikido mentioned, but considering D as my answer "A previous survey had established that consumers thought vinegar would improve the taste of cola". What if most people of the first and second test groups are like the consumers on D's survey. In that case, there will be correlation, but we can't conclude that expectation influences taste (correlation doesn't mean causation).

I would appreciate your comments on this, please. I can't see how D is incorrect.
avatar
pulkitaggi
Joined: 02 Mar 2017
Last visit: 14 Aug 2017
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V34
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V34
Posts: 66
Kudos: 160
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, I need help in understanding the answer to question number 4 ( damaging the conclusion). I am confused between option A and D.

I understand why A can be a answer - Because the expectation of extra cola was to be good ( for group 1 and 2) but if that group liked the regular cola then obviously there ,expectation didn't influence the taste. But in incase of third group - the group was told that the secret ingredient is vinegar and depending on previous survey expectation of the 3rd group was that they will not like the product- which they did not ( according to option A aswell) so here you cannot conclude is it because of their expectation or actually the drink was bad. BUT STILL BECAUSE GROUP 1 AND GROUP 2 RESULT SHOWED THAT EXPECTATION DOES NOT ALTER THE TASTE THIS OPTION CAN BE RIGHT. ( though there is hidden assumption here that extra cola always produces an expectation of liking it more- maybe extra cola produced an expectation of bad product and the result ( according option A) was as expected)

Option D- if the previous survey concluded that people expectation was that the vinegar will improve the taste and the 3rd group people were told about vinegar, then you can say that the expectation of the 3rd group will be that they will like the product- but it turns out that 66% people didn't like the product. This also shows that the expectation does not alter the taste. Now if we check other 2 groups also, they liked the cola extra over normal cola ( again we dont know what extra cola means in terms of expectation- the same assumption as above)- here I cannot say if it is expectation ( that extra cola will be better) or is it actually the taste itself which caused the result.

Please help then why option D is wrong? I believe that option D damages the conclusion much better than option A ( because A rely on the hidden assumption, mentioned above while D is a sure shot weakener in case of group 3)

Thank you in advance
avatar
Abhimanyu201992
Joined: 08 Apr 2017
Last visit: 15 Mar 2021
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 4
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Greetings,
I also have the same query as pulkitaggi. please help me understand the Option C.

Thanks in advance
User avatar
BarcaForLife
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Last visit: 20 Apr 2021
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
67
 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 33
Kudos: 67
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Q-V02-21
For this question I think option C would be more appropriate because in the 2nd paragraph of the passage it is mentioned that " A second group of 100 learned after they had tasted both beverages that vinegar was the secret ingredient. This group, surprisingly, preferred "cola extra" by the same percentage". Since this is the surprising outcome that the reachers were not expecting and refute, to some extent, the hypothesis that expectations do influence taste.
So in this line the author should mention another study for concrete results.

Please clarify!!
User avatar
uazo
Joined: 16 Jan 2021
Last visit: 22 Aug 2023
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I understand why B is correct, the only reason I didn't feel comfortable selecting it is because it said that "expectation can indeed change the physical trace of neural activity." Unless I'm misunderstanding that statement, it just seems like such a far reach from what the initial point of this passage, which is that expectation can alter the experience of taste itself. Altering the experience of taste and changing the physical trace of neural activity is quite the stretch in my opinion. C felt safer even though I didn't fully agree with the statement.

If someone could please clarify it would be much appreciated!
User avatar
Rickooreo
Joined: 24 Dec 2021
Last visit: 15 Feb 2023
Posts: 305
Own Kudos:
30
 [1]
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.95
WE:Real Estate (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 305
Kudos: 30
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel sayantanc2k bb Sajjad1994

In CR, if there is a statitics / result presented, one way to weaken is by stating the the sample is not representative or the procedures required for the survey were not followed properly leading to some biased or manipulated result


For the following question

It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following, if true, would be most damaging to the conclusion that expectation influences taste?
C. Taste testers were told that a "bitter ingredient," rather than a "secret ingredient," had been added to the colas.


Option C plays the same role as described above for the weaken questions in bold

Also can you please suggest an approach to attempt - Strengthen, Weaken, Evaluate (I had such question in my GMAT exam) questions in RC
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
102214 posts
Founder
40949 posts