GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 14 Oct 2019, 13:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

V61-07

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Founder
Founder
User avatar
V
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 18197
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
V61-07  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2018, 00:25
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

31% (01:38) correct 69% (02:33) wrong based on 13 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In 2005, near the small town of Dmanisi, Georgia, a 1.8 million-year-old skull was discovered by the anthropologist David Lordkipanidze. The skull was not the first archeological finding uncovered in the area, but in fact was the most recent of five skulls, all said to be from the same era. The skull, simply named Dmanisi skull 5, is the most complete skull specimen of a Pleistocene Homo species, and the oldest complete adult hominin skull found to date. What is truly groundbreaking about the discovery, however, is that it provides evidence to suggest that two species of early hominins, Homo rudolfensis and Homo habilis, are actually both subspecies of Homo erectus. Furthermore, the discovery also implies that the Homo erectus georgicus ventured out of Africa as far back as 1.85 million years ago, hundreds of thousands of years earlier than anthropologists had previously thought.
Naturally, the skull has been the cause of a paleontological controversy, one still going on today. While these findings are quite compelling, even Lordkipanidze himself admits that his interpretation of the Dmanisi discoveries is far from certain. Skeptics tend to point to the clear differences between the skulls of Dmanisi and the skull structure of Homo erectus. They note that the Dmanisi skulls are smaller and rounded instead of angled at the back, which is reminiscent of the earlier species, Homo habilis, which appeared in Africa two million years ago. Those who support the notion of a single lineage mention the multiple features of the Dmanisi skulls, particularly skull 5, which resemble those of classic homo erectus fossils. These features include straight brow ridges, a line of heavy bone running front-to-back across the top of the skull, and the shape of the nasal cavity. Although there has yet to be a clear agreement regarding the meaning of these findings, it is clear that the long-held notions as to which of our ancestors first left Africa, when they left, and why, have been challenged.

It can be assumed based on the passage that

A. the discovery concerns the natural sciences.
B. skull 5 represents a less advanced species than the other four skulls.
C. the Dmanisi skull 5 belongs to a Homo erectus.
D. the scientific community will likely never come to an agreement regarding the Dmanisi skulls.
E. the author believes that Homo erectus left Africa as early as 1.85 million years ago.

_________________
Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...

Discover Your Admit Options with Decision Tracker Filters!
Founder
Founder
User avatar
V
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 18197
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re V61-07  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2018, 00:25
Official Solution:

In 2005, near the small town of Dmanisi, Georgia, a 1.8 million-year-old skull was discovered by the anthropologist David Lordkipanidze. The skull was not the first archeological finding uncovered in the area, but in fact was the most recent of five skulls, all said to be from the same era. The skull, simply named Dmanisi skull 5, is the most complete skull specimen of a Pleistocene Homo species, and the oldest complete adult hominin skull found to date. What is truly groundbreaking about the discovery, however, is that it provides evidence to suggest that two species of early hominins, Homo rudolfensis and Homo habilis, are actually both subspecies of Homo erectus. Furthermore, the discovery also implies that the Homo erectus georgicus ventured out of Africa as far back as 1.85 million years ago, hundreds of thousands of years earlier than anthropologists had previously thought.
Naturally, the skull has been the cause of a paleontological controversy, one still going on today. While these findings are quite compelling, even Lordkipanidze himself admits that his interpretation of the Dmanisi discoveries is far from certain. Skeptics tend to point to the clear differences between the skulls of Dmanisi and the skull structure of Homo erectus. They note that the Dmanisi skulls are smaller and rounded instead of angled at the back, which is reminiscent of the earlier species, Homo habilis, which appeared in Africa two million years ago. Those who support the notion of a single lineage mention the multiple features of the Dmanisi skulls, particularly skull 5, which resemble those of classic homo erectus fossils. These features include straight brow ridges, a line of heavy bone running front-to-back across the top of the skull, and the shape of the nasal cavity. Although there has yet to be a clear agreement regarding the meaning of these findings, it is clear that the long-held notions as to which of our ancestors first left Africa, when they left, and why, have been challenged.


It can be assumed based on the passage that

A. the discovery concerns the natural sciences.
B. skull 5 represents a less advanced species than the other four skulls.
C. the Dmanisi skull 5 belongs to a Homo erectus.
D. the scientific community will likely never come to an agreement regarding the Dmanisi skulls.
E. the author believes that Homo erectus left Africa as early as 1.85 million years ago.

We’ll go for ExamPal Strategy called ALTERNATIVE because there isn’t enough information to answer the question without using the answers.

(A) The passage does indeed mention anthropology, archeology and paleontology.
(B) is false – the difference between skull 5 and the other skulls is that skull 5 is the most complete.
(C) is what Lordkipanidze believes, but the passage states that this is disputed, and thus it can’t be assumed.
(D) There is no reason to assume this based on the passage. (E) is the discoverer’s opinion, not necessarily the author’s.


This question was provided by ExamPal

Answer: A
_________________
Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...

Discover Your Admit Options with Decision Tracker Filters!
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 543
Location: France
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: V61-07  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2018, 19:33
chetan2u workout VeritasKarishma

What is truly groundbreaking about the discovery, however, is that it provides evidence to suggest that two species of early hominins, Homo rudolfensis and Homo habilis, are actually both subspecies of Homo erectus. Furthermore, the discovery also implies that the Homo erectus georgicus ventured out of Africa as far back as 1.85 million years ago, hundreds of thousands of years earlier than anthropologists had previously thought.

Can we not attribute these lines to author of the passage?

While reading the passage I felt these lines are supported by author...So option E looked legit.

Your insight into this will be very helpful.

Thanks.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…

There is perfect timing for
everything and everyone.
Never doubt, But Work on
improving yourself,
Keep the faith and
Stay ready. When it’s
finally your turn,
It will all make sense.
Math Expert
avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7953
Re: V61-07  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2018, 19:57
1
Harshgmat wrote:
chetan2u workout VeritasKarishma

What is truly groundbreaking about the discovery, however, is that it provides evidence to suggest that two species of early hominins, Homo rudolfensis and Homo habilis, are actually both subspecies of Homo erectus. Furthermore, the discovery also implies that the Homo erectus georgicus ventured out of Africa as far back as 1.85 million years ago, hundreds of thousands of years earlier than anthropologists had previously thought.

Can we not attribute these lines to author of the passage?

While reading the passage I felt these lines are supported by author...So option E looked legit.

Your insight into this will be very helpful.

Thanks.


Why E cannot be the answer is given in last few lines..

"Although there has yet to be a clear agreement regarding the meaning of these findings, it is clear that the long-held notions as to which of our ancestors first left Africa, when they left, and why, have been challenged."

In above lines he clearly mentions that the view has challenged the old thought process but he does not claim it to be true. He has left the view open for further research.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: V61-07   [#permalink] 08 Oct 2018, 19:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

V61-07

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel






Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne