In the absence of international statutes prohibiting nations from caus

Question

In the absence of international statutes prohibiting
nations from causing each other environmental damage,
scholars of international environmental law typically
focus on trying to identify and clarify norms of
  (5)   “customary international law”: that body of commonly
accepted—but not formalized—legal principles that is
manifest in the behavior of nations toward one another.
Two environmental principles are often held to be
established norms of customary international law. One
  (10)   of these principles proscribes transboundary harm:
nations should prohibit activities within their borders
that cause significant environmental harm beyond those
borders. The other is the closely allied precautionary
principle, which requires nations to exercise due care
  (15)   to avoid putting other nations at significant risk of
environmental harm.

In debating whether a given principle should be
classified as a norm of customary international law for
the purposes of deciding international cases,
  (20)   scholars of international environmental law generally
accept an established criterion: principles are norms
only if nations customarily abide by the principles in
actual practice rather than merely affirming them as
desirable standards. In fact, however, many purported
  (25)   “norms” of customary international environmental
law, including the duty to prevent transboundary harm
and the precautionary principle, do not reflect the
actual behavior of many nations. Although systematic
empirical studies are lacking, experience shows that
  (30)   harmful pollutants constantly cross most international
borders, and that nations have only rarely attempted to
remedy this situation.

Even though nations only rarely abide by these
environmental “norms,” they nevertheless routinely
  (35)   profess to accept them. Similarly, while scholars
discussing customary international law claim to focus
on what nations do, their debates are almost invariably
based on what nations profess. In reality, international
environmental “norms” primarily reflect the evaluative
  (40)   standards that nations use to justify their own actions
and criticize those of other nations. Hence these
environmental “norms” are not properly classifiable as
norms of customary international law. They might more
accurately be characterized as an ideological system,
  (45)   since they merely represent some collective ideals of
the international community.

In light of this fact, those scholars who seek
in customary international law a firm grounding for
decisions in international environmental cases are
  (50)   misdirecting their efforts. This is especially true given
that international treaties and direct negotiations, rather
than international court decisions, are now the principal
means of resolving international environmental
disputes. It would be more productive for scholars to study
  (55)   such disputes from perspectives more consonant
with this trend. Specifically, attention should be directed
toward how the affirmation of core environmental
principles can contribute to negotiations and treaty
formation. This approach would promote progress
  (60)   toward agreements that could effectively hold nations
to appropriate standards of environmental conduct.    1 
 1. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

(A) Preventing transboundary harm is often at odds with the economic interests of many nations.
(B) International law is an ideological system of collective ideals reflecting what nations do rather than what they profess.
(C) Many scholars believe that passing international laws to prohibit environmental damage is less effective than negotiating and forming treaties between nations.
(D) The debate regarding which environmental norms are part of customary international law is critical in deciding which nations have violated laws governing transboundary harm.
(E) Solutions to international environmental conflicts are more likely to be found in treaties and direct negotiations than in judicial decisions that are based on customary international law.

2 
 2. Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by information in the passage?

(A) Because of their long-standing preoccupation with principles of customary law, international courts are well prepared to make balanced decisions concerning transboundary pollution.
(B) The precautionary principle is not concerned with a government's relationship to private industries under its jurisdiction.
(C) Nations are rarely held legally accountable for violations of principles that are commonly considered by scholars to be norms of customary international environmental law.
(D) Most violations of customary international environmental law result from disagreements about what constitutes customary law.
(E) Established norms of customary international environmental law that primarily address transboundary airborne pollutants are outdated.

3 
 3. The author claims that which one of the following is true of the precautionary principle and the principle that nations should prevent transboundary harm?

(A) They have commonly been used as models for drafting formalized statutes.
(B) They reflect standards that nations use to criticize other nations.
(C) Scholars have not reached a consensus concerning how to distinguish them from other environmental principles.
(D) Scholars have debated whether their status as part of international law tends to inhibit negotiations.
(E) They are often held to be firmly established models for environmental treaty formation.

4 
 4. Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship between the final paragraph and the first paragraph?

(A) In the final paragraph, the author opposes a scholarly approach mentioned in the first paragraph, proposes an alternative to that approach, and argues for that proposal.
(B) In the final paragraph, the author questions the legal significance of two principles mentioned in the first paragraph, proposes alternative principles, and defends the new principles.
(C) In the final paragraph, the author considers a critique of a practice mentioned in the first paragraph, explores further implications of that critique, but finally accepts the original practice.
(D) In the final paragraph, the author criticizes scholars for focusing on a particular issue and argues that those scholars should instead focus on the legal status of two principles mentioned in the first paragraph.
(E) In the final paragraph, the author reaffirms a claim about legal scholars that is made in the first paragraph, attributes a proposal to those scholars, and argues for a way of carrying out that proposal.

5 
 5. It can be inferred that both the author and the scholars mentioned in the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?

(A) Until extensive empirical studies determine the rate of international conformity to principles of international environmental law, environmental treaties will be largely ineffective.
(B) Judicial decisions that are grounded in customary international law have proven less effective than direct negotiations in resolving international environmental disputes.
(C) If it is difficult to ascertain whether a particular nation generally acts in accordance with the precautionary principle, that principle is not a norm of customary law for the nation in question.
(D) If it can be shown conclusively that nations generally do not act in accordance with a principle, that principle cannot be legitimately considered a norm of customary international law.
(E) Until a large percentage of nations enact treaties embodying the norms of customary international environmental law, there will be no reliable basis for deciding international environmental disputes.

6 
 6. The author's mention of harmful pollutants crossing international borders (last sentence of the second paragraph) functions primarily as

(A) an example of the author's contention that debates concerning customary international law put too little emphasis on environmental issues
(B) a means of suggesting that stronger enforcement of existing international environmental laws is needed
(C) evidence offered by the author in support of the claim that treaties and negotiations are largely ineffective in protecting the environment
(D) an acknowledgment that, in spite of the author's general disagreement with certain scholars mentioned earlier in the second paragraph, their environmental concerns are justified
(E) support for the author's claim that certain international environmental principles do not meet a criterion for being considered norms of customary international law

7 
 7. The author states that there is a dearth of systematic empirical investigation into which one of the following?

(A) the extent to which the actions of nations conform to principles of customary international environmental law
(B) the proportion of international environmental disputes that are remedied by treaties and negotiations as compared with those that are remedied by the application of customary international environmental law
(C) the relative success rates of different attempted legal remedies for the problem of international transboundary pollution
(D) the extent to which the pollution currently crossing international boundaries is in violation of negotiated international treaties
(E) the extent to which scholars of international environmental law agree about which principles are norms of customary international environmental law

RC Butler 2023  -  Practice Two RC Passages Everyday.   
Passage # 71 Date: 22-Mar-2023
 This question is a part of RC Butler 2023 .  Click here for Details

Source:   LSAT Official PrepTest 88   
 Difficulty Level:   650

Afn24 · Answer

1. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Correct :  
(E) Solutions to international environmental conflicts are more likely to be found in treaties and direct negotiations than in judicial decisions that are based on customary international law.

In these lines of the last paragraph the author clearly has a suggestion , which should be captured in the main idea

Specifically, attention should be directed
toward how the affirmation of core environmental
principles can contribute to negotiations and treaty
formation. This approach would promote progress
(60) toward agreements that could effectively hold nations
to appropriate standards of environmental conduct.

2. Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by information in the passage?
 Correct : 
(C) Nations are rarely held legally accountable for violations of principles that are commonly considered by scholars to be norms of customary international environmental law.
 The countries dont face consequences  
Even though nations only rarely abide by these
environmental “norms,” they nevertheless routinely
profess to accept them.

3. The author claims that which one of the following is true of the precautionary principle and the principle that nations should prevent transboundary harm?

Correct: 
(B) They reflect standards that nations use to criticize other nations.

From the passage 
 In reality, international
environmental “norms” primarily reflect the evaluative
(40) standards that nations use to justify their own actions
and criticize those of other nations.

alax123 · Answer

Sajjad1994  can you please share the explanation for Q5? Thanks in advance

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

5. It can be inferred that both the author and the scholars mentioned in the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?

Explanation

The passage emphasizes that scholars of international environmental law generally accept a criterion for classifying principles as norms of customary international law. According to this criterion, principles are considered norms only if nations customarily abide by these principles in actual practice rather than merely affirming them as desirable standards. However, the passage points out that many purported "norms" of customary international environmental law, such as the duty to prevent transboundary harm and the precautionary principle, do not reflect the actual behavior of many nations. Despite nations professing to accept these principles, they rarely abide by them in practice.

The author argues that international environmental  "norms"  primarily reflect the evaluative standards that nations use to justify their own actions and criticize those of other nations. The passage suggests that these "norms" are not properly classifiable as norms of customary international law, as they are not consistently followed by nations.

Given this context, the author and scholars mentioned in the passage would likely agree with  option (D)  – If it can be shown conclusively that nations generally do not act in accordance with a principle, that principle cannot be legitimately considered a norm of customary international law. This statement aligns with the passage's discussion of the criteria for classifying principles as norms and the observation that many principles, while professed, are not consistently followed by nations in practice.

Answer: D

Alka10 · Answer

Hi Folks,

For Q2. I could figure out the correct support in the passage. Can you please help me figure out the correct support out of the two given below for ans choice C in Q2?

1.  Given in line 51  - This is especially true given
that international treaties and direct negotiations, rather
than international court decisions, are now the principal
means of resolving international environmental
disputes.
2. Even though nations only rarely abide by these
environmental “norms,” they nevertheless routinely
(35) profess to accept them. + Although systematic
empirical studies are lacking, experience shows that
(30) harmful pollutants constantly cross most international
borders, and that nations have only rarely attempted to
remedy this situation.

Thanks
Alka

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Lines from the passage that support this statement:

Lines 25-30:  "Although systematic empirical studies are lacking, experience shows that harmful pollutants constantly cross most international borders, and that nations have only rarely attempted to remedy this situation."

Lines 34-36:  "Even though nations only rarely abide by these environmental 'norms,' they nevertheless routinely profess to accept them."

The passage discusses how many principles of customary international environmental law, such as the duty to prevent transboundary harm and the precautionary principle, are often considered norms by scholars but are not consistently followed by nations in practice. Despite professing acceptance of these norms, nations rarely take actions to adhere to them, particularly when it comes to addressing transboundary environmental harm. This lack of consistent adherence implies that nations are rarely held legally accountable for violating these principles.

Hope it helps

Sajjad1994 · Answer

If anyone facing line numbering issue here please decrease the zoom level of Chrome or Internet explorer or Mozilla to 90%.

Raman109 · Answer

2. Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by information in the passage?

We need information that is mentioned in the passage.

Option Elimination -

(A) Because of their long-standing preoccupation with principles of customary law, international courts are well prepared to make balanced decisions concerning transboundary pollution. - The passage actually states the opposite. The passage states that "t hose scholars who seek   in customary international law a firm grounding for decisions in international environmental cases are   misdirecting their efforts. " 
 
(B) The precautionary principle is not concerned with a government's relationship to private industries under its jurisdiction. - It may be true, but remember what our job is here. We need to find what is "mentioned" in the passage. Does the passage even talk about the relationship to private industries? No. Wrong.

(C) Nations are rarely held legally accountable for violations of principles that are commonly considered by scholars to be norms of customary international environmental law. - Which lines convey this? " Although systematic   empirical studies are lacking, experience shows that   harmful pollutants constantly cross most international   borders and that nations have only rarely attempted to remedy this situation." So when do we "only rarely attempt to remedy this situation"? When are we not penalized for our misdeeds? Right? Yes.

(D) Most violations of customary international environmental law result from disagreements about what constitutes customary law. - "Most" we don't know if these are most or some or many. Not mentioned in the passage. Moreover, the actual issue is the adherence to the customary law and not with what constitutes customary law.

(E) Established norms of customary international environmental law that primarily address transboundary airborne pollutants are outdated. - The passage doesn't say that they are outdated, but the issue is that they are more ideological than the accepted ones.

In the absence of international statutes prohibiting nations from caus

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

In the absence of international statutes prohibiting nations from caus

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards