(A) the derivation of smallpox vaccine from a different virus altogether
1) a wrong comparison: "unlike" is used to compare nouns, nouns that are logical to compare. "unlike" can be placed differently:
1)
Unlike men, women have to devote most of their time to their children.
2) women,
Unlike men, have to devote most of their time to their children.
3) women have to devote most of their time to their children,
Unlike men.
all three have the same meaning although "unlike" is placed differently.
answer choice (A) uses the same structure as the third example does. Yet, "
Most vaccines" are being compared with "
the derivation"
(B) smallpox vaccine, which is derived from a different virus altogether
1) A logical and correct comparison: "
most vaccines" are compared with "
smallbox vaccine". So, let's keep B.
(C) smallpox's vaccine, which gets derived from a different virus altogether
1) "smallbox" works better than "smallbox
's vaccine": smallbox has a vaccine?
2) "which is derived from" is better than "which gets derived from": In basic grammar, "get + V_ed" can sometimes substitute for "to be + V_ed" as a passive voice indicator, but the latter gives the logical and total passive voice better.
(D) when smallpox vaccine is derived from an altogether different virus
1) illogical meaning: this choice does not use comparison anymore, but use "when", meaning that
when, or at the same time , smallbox vaccine is derived from different virus, then most vaccines are derived from weakened or killed strains of the same virus.
2) a wrong comparison: "most vaccines" are compared with "when + clause", which is an adverbial phrase.
(E) the altogether different virus from which smallpox vaccine is derived[/quote]
1) a wrong comparison: "most vaccines" are compared with "virus".