Parents hope that by giving their children access to games and

Question

Pack 4, Question 3 of 5:

Parents hope that by giving their children access to games and streaming movies during road trips,  enough has been provided with which the kids can be distracted for several hours and they will not have  to hear “Are we there yet?” repeatedly.

A. enough has been provided with which the kids can be distracted for several hours and they will not have
B. enough has been provided to distract the kids for several hours, thus not having
C. that they have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and not have
D. they have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and will not have
E. they have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and thus not having

◀ Pack 4, Question 2  
 ▶ Pack 4, Question 4 
 ⏏ Question Pack Home

48 Hour Window To Win An $85 EMPOWERgmat Tuition Credit (1 Month Free!)   
Share your explanation!  The GMAT Club member with the most verified Kudos  in total on the 5 question SC Block 4 question pack will  win an $85 EMPOWERgmat tuition credit , which will entitle the winner to a full month of complete access to the EMPOWERgmat system. Even if you're not sure about your answer or your rationale, share your explanation to help boost your learning and earn a chance to win.

To be eligible, your explanation must:
 be submitted within the 48 hour window after this post was created
should explain your reasoning why the answer you chose is correct, and why the other 4 options are incorrect within 48 hours of this post

The OA and official explanation will be held until the 48 hour window has lapsed.

Raxit85 · Answer

Imo. D

Parents hope that by giving their children access to games and streaming movies during road trips, enough has been provided with which the kids can be distracted for several hours and they will not have to hear “Are we there yet?” repeatedly.

Meaning: Parents (usually) hope that by giving their children access to some time pass stuff during the trips, their kids can be distracted for several hours as enough has been given (to kids) and they will not have to hear “Are we there yet?” repeatedly.

A. enough has been provided  with which the  kids can be distracted for several hours and they will not have - usage of provided with which is awkward as which refers to enough. Incorrect
B. enough has been provided to distract the kids for several hours, thus  not having  - It distorts the meaning of second clause of original sentence. As it usual practice of parents, it required the balance (grammatical) between providing enough pass time stuff and its effect on parents. 
C. that they have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours  and not have  - that is has no antecedent and there is no verb in the right part of the connector 'and'.
D. they have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and will not have - Seems no error. Hold it.
E. they have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours  and thus not having  - Same as B.

sampriya · Answer

Parents hope that by giving their children access to games and streaming movies during road trips, enough has been provided with which the kids can be distracted for several hours and they will not have to hear “Are we there yet?” repeatedly.

A. enough has been provided  with which  the kids can be distracted for several hours and  they  will not have- with which is not clear.they could refer back to parents or chidren
B. enough has been provided to distract the kids for several hours, thus not having-  Correct and most concise option! - clearly shows the cause and effect relation :  cause= enough provided; effect= not having to hear! 
C.  that  they have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and not have--- the construction "that clause, that clause " is ungramatical
D. they  have provided  enough to distract the kids for several hours and  will not have - the cause and effectrelation is not clearly mentioned! the two events are not simultaneous!
E. they  have provided  enough to distract the kids for several hours and thus  not having --- the two elements coloured in red are not showing the desired cause and effect

EMPOWERgmatVerbal · Answer

Official Explanation:

Parents hope that by giving their children access to games and streaming movies during road trips,  enough has been provided with which the kids can be distracted for several hours and they will not have  to hear “Are we there yet?” repeatedly.

A.  enough  has been provided with which the kids can be distracted for several hours and they  will not have  
 B.  enough  has been provided to distract the kids for several hours, thus  not having  
 C. that  they  have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and  not have  
 D.  they  have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and will  not have  
 E.  they  have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and thus  not having

A review of our answer options shows a split between starting with “enough” or with “they.” We also have to decide if we need to use “not having,” “not have,” or “will not have” as the second portion of this compound clause.

When trying to determine which subject is needed, we need to ask who is providing the distraction. The subject of the non-underlined portion of the sentence is the parents. The pronoun “they” tells us that “the parents” are the ones who are providing. This makes sense. Options A and B have “enough” as the subject. “Enough” also has to work with the portion of the sentence that isn’t underlined. In Option A, “they” is once again, we guess, referring to the parents, but with the introduction of “enough” as a subject, this second “they” could also be referring to games and streaming movies. Confused? It’s no wonder. This option lacks clarity. In Option B how can “enough” not have to hear? “Enough” can’t hear; that doesn’t make sense.  Options A and B cannot be the correct answers.

Option E uses “thus,” which it is used to show the outcome of an event, but we don’t know if the distractions will actually work. The sentence would read “They have provided enough to distract the kids and thus not having to hear “Are we there yet?” repeatedly.” That doesn’t make sense.  Option E cannot be the correct answer. 
 
Option C uses “not have,” which is present tense and does not indicate anything about the future. The parents provide a distraction now so that they do not have to hear endless whining and questions in the future. A tense that indicates the future would make more sense. Additionally, Option C starts with “that.” The non-underlined portion of the sentence also has a that clause, so we have two relative clauses back-to-back. This should be avoided.  Option C cannot be the best answer.

The only option left is the correct choice: option D.

EMPOWERgmatVerbal · Answer

Well done,  Raxit85 ! You cracked the code on this one!

EMPOWERgmatVerbal · Answer

Hello  sampriya !

You were so close! You are on the right track with option A - the pronoun "they" is absolutely vague! It could refer back to the parents, children, or even the games and streaming services! Good call to rule that one out!

However, you do need to look at the two events in each option as happening at the same time (kids distracted for several hours & not bothering their parents with "are we there yet?"). That should help you see the correct choice here is D - it's the only one that is clear, concise, and uses consistent verb tense for both events.

I hope that helps! Please feel free to tag me at  EMPOWERgmatVerbal  if you have any questions!

ravigupta2912 · Answer

EMPOWERgmatVerbal  - Could you please check my PoE here?

A. enough has been provided with which the kids can be distracted for several hours and they will not have -- "with which" is the incorrect usage of "with" preposition.

B. enough has been provided to distract the kids for several hours, thus not having -- sentence structure is main clause 1, modifier 1, modifier 2. Grammatically, modifier 2 here is referring back to modifier 1 and not main clause which is the intention of sentence.

I have a general question here. Can modifier 2 in general refer back to the main clause under any situation? Or am I misconstruing "enough has been.." as a modifier when it is an  independent clause  with "enough" as the subject and "has been provided" as the verb, "to bla bla hours" as the object?

C. that they have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and not have -- illogical verb sequence. the "worry" is in future and hence "will" is needed. "and not have" is actually present perfect and incorrect (its still a verb, just an illogical one). "have" One can argue that "would" will be better here since its a hypothetical.

D. they have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and will not have -- Correct.

E. they have provided enough to distract the kids for several hours and thus not having -- Parallelism error. "they have provided X" (element 1 is a clause) and "thus not having.." (gerund) are not parallel to each other.

EMPOWERgmatVerbal · Answer

Thanks for asking ravigupta2912 ! I think your logic in how you answered the question is pretty good. You can also check out the official explanation in the comments above for how we tackled it. To answer your specific question about option B, let's look at what the entire sentence would look like with option B plugged in: Parents hope that by giving their children access to games and streaming movies during road trips, enough has been provided to distract the kids for several hours, thus not having to hear “Are we there yet?” repeatedly. You are on the right track when you ask if the phrase "enough has been provided to distract the kids for several hours" is, in fact, an independent clause! It is! The main problem with option B is that the independent clause is this: Enough has been provided to distract the kids for several hours. What's the subject of this sentence? Enough THIS is our problem - by changing the subject of the sentence to "enough," the two modifiers don't make sense because they're both supposed to be referring to parents. Since "parents" do not appear anywhere in the independent clause, the modifiers CANNOT refer to them. In options D & E, they introduce the pronoun "they," which CAN easily stand in for "parents." When you add in a pronoun that can easily stand in for "parents," now the 2 modifiers can easily refer to the subject in a way that makes sense. Of course, in the end, you'll end up eliminating option E because of the wrong verb tense, leaving you with option D.

I hope that helps clear things up!

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Parents hope that by giving their children access to games and

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Parents hope that by giving their children access to games and

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards