Official ExplanationNot believing themselves to choose accurately among the various choices of real-estate acquisitions in the housing market,
realtors are assisting numerous clients who go to them to purchase homes that could be easily purchased directly.
A. realtors are assisting numerous clients who go to them to purchase homes that could be easilyB. realtors are assisting numerous clients who are going to them for assistance in purchasing homes that they could easily haveC. numerous clients are going to realtors for assistance from them to purchase homes that could be easilyD. numerous clients are going to realtors for assistance to purchase homes that easily could have beenE. numerous clients are going to realtors for assistance in purchasing homes that could easily beAfter a quick glance over our options, a few key differences jump out:
1. realtors vs. numerous clients2. assisting / for assistance in purchasing / for assistance from them to purchase / for assistance to purchase3. that could be easily / that they could easily have / that easily could have been / that could easily beLet’s start with #1 in our list: realtors vs. numerous clients. If we look at the original sentence, we can see that it begins with a modifier:
Not believing themselves to choose accurately among the various choices of real-estate acquisitions in the housing market, realtors are assisting numerous clients who go to them to purchase homes that could be easily purchased directly.
We need to make sure that the noun directly after the modifier (aka the antecedent) is what that phrase is directly referring to. So, ask yourself this question: WHO doesn’t believe they can choose the right home? The clients or the realtors? It makes more sense to be the clients. Let’s see which options handle this correctly, and eliminate the ones that don’t:
A.
realtors are assisting numerous clients who go to them to purchase homes that could be easily
B.
realtors are assisting numerous clients who are going to them for assistance in purchasing homes that they could easily have
C.
numerous clients are going to realtors for assistance from them to purchase homes that could be easily
D.
numerous clients are going to realtors for assistance to purchase homes that easily could have been
E.
numerous clients are going to realtors for assistance in purchasing homes that could easily be
We can eliminate options A & B because the modifier and antecedent don’t match up properly. Now that we have it narrowed down to 3 options, let’s move on to #2 & #3 on our list. #2 on our list has to do with the verb tense/idiom agreement of the verb “assist.” The last issue is how the underlined phrase ends. Let’s focus our attention on these 2 places and see what we come up with:
C. numerous clients are going to realtors for assistance from them to purchase homes that could be easilyThis is
INCORRECT. In this case, the phrase “realtors for assistance from them” is redundant. There is no need for the word “them” because we know who the clients are going to - the realtors.
D. numerous clients are going to realtors for assistance to purchase homes that easily could have beenThis is
INCORRECT. In this case, “assistance to” is incorrect; it should be “assistance in.” The other issue is that “could have been” is in the past tense, whereas the rest of the sentence is in present tense.
E. numerous clients are going to realtors for assistance in purchasing homes that could easily beThis is
CORRECT. In this case, the entire sentence is written in present tense, it uses the correct idiom “assistance in,” and it is logical because “numerous clients” clearly refers to “themselves.”
There you have it - option E is the correct choice!Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.