Official ExplanationThe number of violent crimes, offenses that include sexual assault, robbery, and murder, declined sharply over ten years,
in decreasing from 1.4 million in 2008 to be 1.2 million in 2018.
A. in decreasing from 1.4 million in 2008 to beB. in having decreased from 1.4 million in 2008 toC. as it decreased from 1.4 million in 2008 to beD. decreasing from 1.4 million in 2008 toE. with its decrease from 1.4 million in 2008 toAfter a quick glance over the options, we find 2 main differences we can use to narrow down our options:
1. in decreasing / in having decreased / as it decreased / decreasing / with its decrease (Construction & Meaning)
2. to be / to (Idioms)Since #2 on our list is an “either/or” split, let’s start there. No matter which one we choose, we’ll eliminate 2-3 options rather quickly. This is an issue with the idiom “from X
to Y.” We need to eliminate any that don’t follow this specific structure:
A. in decreasing from 1.4 million in 2008
to beB. in having decreased from 1.4 million in 2008
toC. as it decreased from 1.4 million in 2008
to beD. decreasing from 1.4 million in 2008
toE. with its decrease from 1.4 million in 2008
toWe can eliminate options A & C because “from X to be Y” is not the correct form of the idiom. Now that we have it narrowed down to just 3 options, let’s tackle #1 on our list. We need to make sure the sentences are clear, concise, and don’t contain anything that would confuse readers:
B. in having decreased from 1.4 million in 2008 toThis is
INCORRECT because “in having decreased” is overly wordy and confusing. Saying “decreasing” will accomplish the same thing in far fewer words – and much more clearly!
D. decreasing from 1.4 million in 2008 toHere is our
CORRECT choice! The word “decreasing” clearly establishes this phrase as an -ing modifier, and it clearly modifies the previous clause.
E. with its decrease from 1.4 million in 2008 toThis is
INCORRECT because we have a vague pronoun! It’s not 100% clear what the pronoun “its” is referring back to: the entire list of violent crimes, or just one of the specific examples of crimes? Remember – if it’s not 100% clear, it’s a no-no on the GMAT!
There you have it – option D is our winner! By starting with the either/or split, we were able to eliminate a couple options quickly, leaving us more time to address more complex issues!
Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.