Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
18 Sep 2020, 00:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
43% (01:32) correct
57%
(01:33)
wrong
based on 727
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In the Nazca region of Peru, an area famous for the Nazca lines, enormous geometric images carved into the landscape to form a sophisticated hydraulic system that retrieved water from underground aquifers and made the arid land habitable.
A) In the Nazca region of Peru, an area famous for the Nazca lines,
B) In the Nazca region of Peru, an area famous for the Nazca lines, which are
C) In the Nazca region of Peru, an area famous for the Nazca lines that are
D) The Nazca region of Peru, an area famous for the Nazca lines,
E) The Nazca region of Peru is an area famous for the Nazca lines,
18 Sep 2020, 00:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
THE PROMPT
Scan the options quickly before you even look at the sentence.
The options are incredibly similar.
Ninety percent of the time, in this context (a long, convoluted prompt with options that vary only a little), you will think that you are facing a difficult construction (say, apposition or an absolute phrase) when in fact you will be facing something basic, such as a subject that lacks a verb.
What makes this sentence hard is the fact that a lot of words look like possible subjects and even more words look like possible verbs.
So we'll focus on finding the most important parts: the subject and the verb.
Breaking the sentence down:
In the Nazca region of Peru
. . . an area famous for the Nazca lines,
. . . . . . . . enormous geometric images [???]
. . . . . . . . . . . . carved
??? Wait.
Is that word, carved, a verb? Doubtful. Geometric images cannot themselves carve anything.
Okay, so "carved" is a past participle (a verbED).
Carved must therefore be an adjective that modifies the noun images.
STOP THERE.
We are quite far in. We are looking for the main subject. We have not yet found it. Now we know that we must read the rest of the sentence carefully.
Take a breath through your nose, exhale through your mouth (no kidding), and read a little bit more slowly than usual.
Remember that unless a sentence is inverted (in which case we know the subject might be hard to locate), in English, the subject shows up pretty quickly.
The standard sentence structure is subject → verb → object.
"In the Nazca region of Peru" is an introductory prepositional phrase that almost certainly tells us something about the subject, the verb, or the whole main clause.
What does it modify?
→ → most immediately, it modifies an area famous for the Nazca lines
→ → it could also modify the whole sentence, if everything that follows the second phrase modifies that phrase.
Introductory prepositional phrases are among the most versatile of modifiers.
They do not have to follow rules as strictly as five other kinds of introductory statements do.
You can read about the six (or seven?) kinds of introductory statements and what they should modify in my post, here.
Although introductory prepositional phrases can merely "set the stage" for the rest of the sentence, most of the time they do modify the main clause.
At least in the prompt, the subject of the main clause seems to be an area.
Verb?
THE OPTIONS
• no main verb exists
→ carved cannot be the main verb.
-- Geometric images would have to be the subject.
-- But geometric images do not themselves carve anything.
Geometric images are carved (by people).
Carved is thus a past participle adjective (a verbED) that describes the noun geometric images.
→ retrieved and made cannot verbs in the main clause
-- Both retrieved and made belong to that.
-- That refers to hydraulic system, is a result of the Nazca lines and is not the subject of the sentence.
-- The relative pronoun that "eats up" the available verbs.
-- This trap is one of GMAC's favorites.
-- Takeaway: if a possible subject is followed by a relative pronoun (that, which, or who), look to see whether the relative pronoun "eats up" the verb(s). If so, the sentence is "incomplete" because the main subject lacks a verb.
• the subject appears to be an area.
No main verb exists.
No main verb? No sentence.
ELIMINATE A
-- Which is an adjective clause that describes the noun lines.
-- Except in very rare cases not present here, the object of a preposition cannot be the subject of a sentence, so lines cannot be the subject.
• if we shorten the sentence, we have
→ In the Nazca region of Peru, an area famous for the Nazca lines, which are enormous geometric images carved . . . . .[more description of the lines]
• the subject must be an area
Now we face the same problem as that in (A): no verb exists for the subject.
ELIMINATE B
→ area is not paired with its own verb
ELIMINATE C
• no verb exists to be paired with that subject, either.
ELIMINATE D
Subject: The Nazca region of Perus
Verb: is
Subject complement: an area famous for the Nazca lines [(which are) enormous geometric images (that were) carved into XYZ to form a hydraulic system that did P and Q.
The answer is E.
COMMENTS
To everyone who attempted an answer: well done on the courage front!
To JonShukhrat : Generally, huge congratulations: beautifully executed and well-deserved.
Specifically, thank you for helping on this question. +2 (ahem, zhanbo ?)
zhanbo , you were brave. Brave is good.
vijk and winterschool -- you were both brave and correct. Well done. Kudos to all.
Project SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
THE PROMPT
Quote:
You can see that this sentence is long.
Scan the options quickly before you even look at the sentence.
The options are incredibly similar.
Ninety percent of the time, in this context (a long, convoluted prompt with options that vary only a little), you will think that you are facing a difficult construction (say, apposition or an absolute phrase) when in fact you will be facing something basic, such as a subject that lacks a verb.
What makes this sentence hard is the fact that a lot of words look like possible subjects and even more words look like possible verbs.
So we'll focus on finding the most important parts: the subject and the verb.
Breaking the sentence down:
In the Nazca region of Peru
. . . an area famous for the Nazca lines,
. . . . . . . . enormous geometric images [???]
. . . . . . . . . . . . carved
??? Wait.
Is that word, carved, a verb? Doubtful. Geometric images cannot themselves carve anything.
Okay, so "carved" is a past participle (a verbED).
Carved must therefore be an adjective that modifies the noun images.
STOP THERE.
We are quite far in. We are looking for the main subject. We have not yet found it. Now we know that we must read the rest of the sentence carefully.
Take a breath through your nose, exhale through your mouth (no kidding), and read a little bit more slowly than usual.
Remember that unless a sentence is inverted (in which case we know the subject might be hard to locate), in English, the subject shows up pretty quickly.
The standard sentence structure is subject → verb → object.
"In the Nazca region of Peru" is an introductory prepositional phrase that almost certainly tells us something about the subject, the verb, or the whole main clause.
What does it modify?
→ → most immediately, it modifies an area famous for the Nazca lines
→ → it could also modify the whole sentence, if everything that follows the second phrase modifies that phrase.
Introductory prepositional phrases are among the most versatile of modifiers.
They do not have to follow rules as strictly as five other kinds of introductory statements do.
You can read about the six (or seven?) kinds of introductory statements and what they should modify in my post, here.
Although introductory prepositional phrases can merely "set the stage" for the rest of the sentence, most of the time they do modify the main clause.
At least in the prompt, the subject of the main clause seems to be an area.
Verb?
THE OPTIONS
Quote:
• an area is the only plausible subject
• no main verb exists
→ carved cannot be the main verb.
-- Geometric images would have to be the subject.
-- But geometric images do not themselves carve anything.
Geometric images are carved (by people).
Carved is thus a past participle adjective (a verbED) that describes the noun geometric images.
→ retrieved and made cannot verbs in the main clause
-- Both retrieved and made belong to that.
-- That refers to hydraulic system, is a result of the Nazca lines and is not the subject of the sentence.
-- The relative pronoun that "eats up" the available verbs.
-- This trap is one of GMAC's favorites.
-- Takeaway: if a possible subject is followed by a relative pronoun (that, which, or who), look to see whether the relative pronoun "eats up" the verb(s). If so, the sentence is "incomplete" because the main subject lacks a verb.
• the subject appears to be an area.
No main verb exists.
No main verb? No sentence.
ELIMINATE A
Quote:
• we still do not have a verb. This fact may be easier to see because the which are clause is set off by a comma.
-- Which is an adjective clause that describes the noun lines.
-- Except in very rare cases not present here, the object of a preposition cannot be the subject of a sentence, so lines cannot be the subject.
• if we shorten the sentence, we have
→ In the Nazca region of Peru, an area famous for the Nazca lines, which are enormous geometric images carved . . . . .[more description of the lines]
• the subject must be an area
Now we face the same problem as that in (A): no verb exists for the subject.
ELIMINATE B
Quote:
• although the language and phrasing may seem strange, it is okay to say Nazca lines that are enormous geometric images (the lines actually are enormous geometric images). But we still lack a verb for what should be the main subject.
→ area is not paired with its own verb
ELIMINATE C
Quote:
• With the word "in" removed, the subject of the sentence is now the Nazca region
• no verb exists to be paired with that subject, either.
ELIMINATE D
Quote:
• Bingo.
Subject: The Nazca region of Perus
Verb: is
Subject complement: an area famous for the Nazca lines [(which are) enormous geometric images (that were) carved into XYZ to form a hydraulic system that did P and Q.
The answer is E.
COMMENTS
To everyone who attempted an answer: well done on the courage front!
To JonShukhrat : Generally, huge congratulations: beautifully executed and well-deserved.
Specifically, thank you for helping on this question. +2 (ahem, zhanbo ?)
zhanbo , you were brave. Brave is good.
vijk and winterschool -- you were both brave and correct. Well done. Kudos to all.
General Discussion
18 Sep 2020, 00:33
Kudos
Bookmarks
My answer is (A). It took me 42 seconds. This question turns out to be rather straightforward.
(A) Nothing wrong. The subject of main clause is "enormous geometric images" and the verb is "carved into".
(B) Among other things, there is no main clause in this version.
(C) Among other things, there is no main clause in this version.
(D) There are now two nouns for possible subject (The Nazca region of Peru & enormous geometric images). Even if we do not care about or try hard to understand the intended meaning, it is grammatically incorrect: At least, there should be an "And" or "Or" between two subjects.
(E) See (D).
(A) Nothing wrong. The subject of main clause is "enormous geometric images" and the verb is "carved into".
(B) Among other things, there is no main clause in this version.
(C) Among other things, there is no main clause in this version.
(D) There are now two nouns for possible subject (The Nazca region of Peru & enormous geometric images). Even if we do not care about or try hard to understand the intended meaning, it is grammatically incorrect: At least, there should be an "And" or "Or" between two subjects.
(E) See (D).
