Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
hideyoshi
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Last visit: 05 Dec 2020
Posts: 72
Given Kudos: 18
Affiliations: Scrum Alliance
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Ross Weekend"19 Booth PT '20 (M)
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V38
WE:Information Technology (Retail: E-commerce)
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
45% (02:02) correct
55%
(02:12)
wrong
based on 345
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Costly X-rays often not needed, the OT rules were developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray, since only 5% of patients before the rules actually had fractures when X-rayed.
A. Costly X-rays often not needed, the OT rules were developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray, since only 5% of patients before the rules actually had fractures when X-rayed.
B. The OT rules were developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray, since only 5% of patients before the rules’ development actually had fractures when X-rayed, and these X-rays were costly and often not needed.
C. Since only 5% of patients before the rules’ development actually had fractures when X-rayed, and these X-rays were costly and often not needed, the OT rules were developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray.
D. Developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray, only 5% of patients, when X-rayed, actually had fractures before the OT rules were developed, and X-rays were costly and often not needed.
E. The OT rules were developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray; X-rays were costly and often not needed, and 5% of patients, when X-rayed actually had fractures before the rules’ development.
A. Costly X-rays often not needed, the OT rules were developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray, since only 5% of patients before the rules actually had fractures when X-rayed.
B. The OT rules were developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray, since only 5% of patients before the rules’ development actually had fractures when X-rayed, and these X-rays were costly and often not needed.
C. Since only 5% of patients before the rules’ development actually had fractures when X-rayed, and these X-rays were costly and often not needed, the OT rules were developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray.
D. Developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray, only 5% of patients, when X-rayed, actually had fractures before the OT rules were developed, and X-rays were costly and often not needed.
E. The OT rules were developed to aid in a doctor’s decision as to whether a patient with foot pain should be offered an X-ray; X-rays were costly and often not needed, and 5% of patients, when X-rayed actually had fractures before the rules’ development.
11 Oct 2011, 07:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
I've voted for B here.
A is incorrect for the way it starts. "Costly X-rays often not needed" looks like an out of place modifier?
E - The last bit "when X-rayed actually had fractures before the rules’ development" does not seem to appreciate the development of OT rules.
D - Again seems to be a modifier error.
Between B and C. I chose B over C because B puts the main clause / sub clause combo in the right order.. gives me the maximum clarity at least.
Experts please correct me.
A is incorrect for the way it starts. "Costly X-rays often not needed" looks like an out of place modifier?
E - The last bit "when X-rayed actually had fractures before the rules’ development" does not seem to appreciate the development of OT rules.
D - Again seems to be a modifier error.
Between B and C. I chose B over C because B puts the main clause / sub clause combo in the right order.. gives me the maximum clarity at least.
Experts please correct me.
+1 for B.
Searched in other forums. OA is indeed B. Brilliant explanation provided by Eli Meyer, Kaplan GMAT instructor.
A is incorrect. In English, clauses (subject-verb structures) must be linked to one another by exactly one connecting phrase. In A, there is no connector between the clause "X-rays aren't needed" and "the OT rules were developed." It needs a "because," "since," or "so," to be correct; as written, it's a run-on sentence.
D is incorrect because the initial descriptive phrase, "developed to...", describes the OT rules, but the phrase is adjacent to "5% of patients." This is a modification error, and is incorrect.
E looks good; replacing a comma with a semicolon is one way to correct a run-on. However, the very last bit is garbled. 'when tested' is a descriptive phrase the needs to be followed by a comma, and "before the rules development" at the end of this version is a dangling modifier.
B and C are almost identical. Literally the only difference between the two is the order of the clauses. However, B has the superior order. B introduces "patients with foot pain" and "the OT rules" in it's first clause, then clearly refers back to "patients" and "the rules" in the second clause. C, on the other hand, starts by talking about the ambiguous "patients" and "the rules," and not until the second clause does it actually clarify the specifics of its subjects.
B is correct.
Searched in other forums. OA is indeed B. Brilliant explanation provided by Eli Meyer, Kaplan GMAT instructor.
A is incorrect. In English, clauses (subject-verb structures) must be linked to one another by exactly one connecting phrase. In A, there is no connector between the clause "X-rays aren't needed" and "the OT rules were developed." It needs a "because," "since," or "so," to be correct; as written, it's a run-on sentence.
D is incorrect because the initial descriptive phrase, "developed to...", describes the OT rules, but the phrase is adjacent to "5% of patients." This is a modification error, and is incorrect.
E looks good; replacing a comma with a semicolon is one way to correct a run-on. However, the very last bit is garbled. 'when tested' is a descriptive phrase the needs to be followed by a comma, and "before the rules development" at the end of this version is a dangling modifier.
B and C are almost identical. Literally the only difference between the two is the order of the clauses. However, B has the superior order. B introduces "patients with foot pain" and "the OT rules" in it's first clause, then clearly refers back to "patients" and "the rules" in the second clause. C, on the other hand, starts by talking about the ambiguous "patients" and "the rules," and not until the second clause does it actually clarify the specifics of its subjects.
B is correct.
