Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
51% (02:34) correct
49%
(02:53)
wrong
based on 819
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The fishing industry cannot currently be relied upon to help the government count the seabirds killed by net fishing, since an accurate count might result in restriction of net fishing. The government should therefore institute a program under which tissue samples from the dead birds are examined to determine the amount of toxins in the fish eaten by the birds. The industry would then have a reason to turn in the bird carcasses, since the industry needs to know whether the fish it catches are contaminated with toxins.
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that the government program would not by itself provide an accurate count of the seabirds killed by net fishing?
(A) The seabirds killed by net fishing might be contaminated with several different toxins even if the birds eat only one kind of fish
(B) The fishing industry could learn whether the fish it catches are contaminated with toxins if only a few of the seabirds killed by the nets were examined
(C) The government could gain valuable information about the source of toxins by examining tissue samples of the seabirds caught in the nets.
(D) The fish caught in a particular net might be contaminated with the same toxins as those in the seabirds caught in that net.
(E) The government would be willing to certify that the fish caught by the industry are not contaminated with toxins if tests done on the seabirds showed no contamination
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that the government program would not by itself provide an accurate count of the seabirds killed by net fishing?
(A) The seabirds killed by net fishing might be contaminated with several different toxins even if the birds eat only one kind of fish
(B) The fishing industry could learn whether the fish it catches are contaminated with toxins if only a few of the seabirds killed by the nets were examined
(C) The government could gain valuable information about the source of toxins by examining tissue samples of the seabirds caught in the nets.
(D) The fish caught in a particular net might be contaminated with the same toxins as those in the seabirds caught in that net.
(E) The government would be willing to certify that the fish caught by the industry are not contaminated with toxins if tests done on the seabirds showed no contamination
23 Dec 2010, 13:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
premise 1 : The fishing industry cannot currently be relied upon to help the government count the seabirds killed by net fishing, since an accurate count might result in restriction of net fishing.
Premise 2The government should therefore institute a program under which tissue samples from the dead birds are examined to determine the amount of toxins in the fish eaten by the birds.
Premise 3 : The industry would then have a reason to turn in the bird carcasses, since the industry needs to know whether the fish it catches are contaminated with toxins.
Conclusion :Govt will then have an accurate count of sea birdls killed by net fishing
To weaken the conc, the govt will not have an accurate count if the fishermen only turn in less bird carcasses than have actually died.
Since the fishermen can achieve their goal of ascertaining the number of toxins that the fish are infected with by turning in a small number of bird carcasses, the govt conc will be weakened.
Premise 2The government should therefore institute a program under which tissue samples from the dead birds are examined to determine the amount of toxins in the fish eaten by the birds.
Premise 3 : The industry would then have a reason to turn in the bird carcasses, since the industry needs to know whether the fish it catches are contaminated with toxins.
Conclusion :Govt will then have an accurate count of sea birdls killed by net fishing
To weaken the conc, the govt will not have an accurate count if the fishermen only turn in less bird carcasses than have actually died.
Since the fishermen can achieve their goal of ascertaining the number of toxins that the fish are infected with by turning in a small number of bird carcasses, the govt conc will be weakened.
General Discussion
16 Dec 2016, 19:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
Now the government wants to know the seabirds being killed by net fishing. But the industry will not give this info on their own, as wildlife NGOs and government may not like the damage to so many birds and put restriction on net fishing.
So the recommendation is that the government looks for toxin that the fishes are contaminated with by checking the fishes eaten by these dead birds. The government expects that the industry guys would deposit the dead birds to government.
We have to find a reason why these industries will not participate in it.
B tells you
If by depositing just few dead birds, the amount of toxins can be found out, why would they deposit any more dead birds. And thus the correct number will still not be known.
So the recommendation is that the government looks for toxin that the fishes are contaminated with by checking the fishes eaten by these dead birds. The government expects that the industry guys would deposit the dead birds to government.
We have to find a reason why these industries will not participate in it.
B tells you
If by depositing just few dead birds, the amount of toxins can be found out, why would they deposit any more dead birds. And thus the correct number will still not be known.
