Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 04:30 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 04:30
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
TGC
User avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Last visit: 19 Jul 2017
Posts: 572
Own Kudos:
3,621
 [14]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
Schools: ISB '16 NUS '17 NTU '17 XLRI SMU '17 IIM Lucknow IPMX'16 (A)
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
Schools: ISB '16 NUS '17 NTU '17 XLRI SMU '17 IIM Lucknow IPMX'16 (A)
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
Posts: 572
Kudos: 3,621
 [14]
The news media is often accused of being willing to do Updated on: 15 May 2017, 09:49
Originally posted by TGC on 30 Jan 2013, 20:57.
Last edited by broall on 15 May 2017, 09:49, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:56) correct 35% (02:15) wrong based on 824 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The news media is often accused of being willing to do anything for ratings. However, recent action by a television network indicates that the news media is sometimes guided by moral principle. This network had discovered through polling voters on the east coast that the Republican candidate for President had garnered enough votes to ensure victory before the polls closed on the west coast. However, the network withheld this information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.

Which one of the following most strengthens the argument?

(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President.
(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner.
(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed.
(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race.
(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers.

Source:LSAT
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,948
Own Kudos:
811,685
Given Kudos: 105,927
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,948
Kudos: 811,685
The news media is often accused of being willing to do 08 Mar 2021, 05:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TGC
The news media is often accused of being willing to do anything for ratings. However, recent action by a television network indicates that the news media is sometimes guided by moral principle. This network had discovered through polling voters on the east coast that the Republican candidate for President had garnered enough votes to ensure victory before the polls closed on the west coast. However, the network withheld this information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.

Which one of the following most strengthens the argument?

(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President.
(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner.
(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed.
(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race.
(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers.

Source:LSAT
Show more

Official Explanation



The suppressed premise in this argument is that the network hurt itself by not predicting the winner of the presidential race, or at least did not help itself. To strengthen the argument, we need to show that this assumption is true. Choice (B) implies that this is the case by stating that the network expected to lose ratings if it did not predict a winner. Hence the answer is (B).
General Discussion
User avatar
Marcab
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 22 Jan 2021
Posts: 840
Own Kudos:
4,945
Given Kudos: 221
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Simon '15 (M$)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Schools: Simon '15 (M$)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 840
Kudos: 4,945
The news media is often accused of being willing to do 30 Jan 2013, 22:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
targetgmatchotu
The news media is often accused of being willing to do anything for ratings. However, recent action by a television network indicates that the news media is sometimes guided by moral principle. This network had discovered through polling voters on the east coast that the Republican candidate for President had garnered enough votes to ensure victory before the polls closed on the west coast. However, the network withheld this information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.
Which one of the following most strengthens the argument?
(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President.
(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner.
(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed.
(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race.
(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers.
source:LSAT
Show more

Try to find the conclusion.
The conclusion is: "news media is sometimes guided by moral principle".
For the conclusion to be true, the author gives some evidence that the network withheld some information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.
In order to strengthen the argument, one must find that a way to show that what the news media did was endorsed by moral principle OR to show that if it had disclosed the information, its ratings would have increased.
Answer choice B does one of the above mentioned tasks.
User avatar
greatps24
User avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Last visit: 23 Jan 2017
Posts: 199
Own Kudos:
508
Given Kudos: 75
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE:Consulting (Telecommunications)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
Posts: 199
Kudos: 508
The news media is often accused of being willing to do 31 Jan 2013, 10:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
targetgmatchotu
The news media is often accused of being willing to do anything for ratings. However, recent action by a television network indicates that the news media is sometimes guided by moral principle. This network had discovered through polling voters on the east coast that the Republican candidate for President had garnered enough votes to ensure victory before the polls closed on the west coast. However, the network withheld this information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.
Which one of the following most strengthens the argument?
(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President.
(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner.
(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed.
(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race.
(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers.
source:LSAT
Show more

Convoluted Conclusion. But, once you find the conclusion then it is easy to find the answer.


Conclusion: news media is sometimes guided by moral principle
Option B strengthens the conclusion.
User avatar
CharuKapoor
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2012
Last visit: 02 Jul 2014
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
637
Given Kudos: 14
Status:Dedicates 2013 to MBA !!
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
Schools: HBS '16 (S) Ross '16 (S) Tepper '16 (S) Kellogg 1YR '16 (WD) McCombs '15 (S)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Schools: HBS '16 (S) Ross '16 (S) Tepper '16 (S) Kellogg 1YR '16 (WD) McCombs '15 (S)
Posts: 27
Kudos: 637
The news media is often accused of being willing to do 31 Jan 2013, 16:24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Okies...Well...I'll try to explain in Detail -

Fact - A network did not reveal results.
Conclusion: News media is sometimes guided by moral principle.

(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President. Ohh...so they did endorse him ! But this is not close to our question - whether ratings or morals were involved.

(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner. - Common !! The ratings would have increased if they predicted the winner. What kept them back - might be Morals :) Hold it for now.

(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed. - So what?? This fact doesn't lead us anywhere/ OOS.

(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race. - This is the weakener instead. If they knew that holding the results will in turn get them better ratings, definitely morals are not in picture.

(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers. - So it was the fear and not Morals. Weakener instead.

So, B looks like the best choice here. Hope this helps !!
avatar
redfield
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Aug 2014
Last visit: 18 Jun 2019
Posts: 303
Own Kudos:
271
Given Kudos: 80
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 303
Kudos: 271
The news media is often accused of being willing to do 13 Sep 2014, 17:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CharuKapoor
Okies...Well...I'll try to explain in Detail -

Fact - A network did not reveal results.
Conclusion: News media is sometimes guided by moral principle.

(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President. Ohh...so they did endorse him ! But this is not close to our question - whether ratings or morals were involved.

(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner. - Common !! The ratings would have increased if they predicted the winner. What kept them back - might be Morals :) Hold it for now.

(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed. - So what?? This fact doesn't lead us anywhere/ OOS.

(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race. - This is the weakener instead. If they knew that holding the results will in turn get them better ratings, definitely morals are not in picture.

(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers. - So it was the fear and not Morals. Weakener instead.

So, B looks like the best choice here. Hope this helps !!
Show more


But here's my question. If east coast poll said Republican leader had enough to win but network waited for west coast before saying anything, doesn't option A suggest they put accuracy of polls over own personal agenda?

Whereas in B if the network was worried about predicting the winner they would wait for both west and east coast polls to get it right?
User avatar
abrakadabra21
User avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Last visit: 10 Nov 2017
Posts: 243
Own Kudos:
224
 [1]
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: Yale '18 ISB '18 (D) Judge"18
Schools: Yale '18 ISB '18 (D) Judge"18
Posts: 243
Kudos: 224
 [1]
The news media is often accused of being willing to do 15 Apr 2016, 03:39
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Marcab
targetgmatchotu
The news media is often accused of being willing to do anything for ratings. However, recent action by a television network indicates that the news media is sometimes guided by moral principle. This network had discovered through polling voters on the east coast that the Republican candidate for President had garnered enough votes to ensure victory before the polls closed on the west coast. However, the network withheld this information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.
Which one of the following most strengthens the argument?
(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President.
(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner.
(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed.
(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race.
(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers.
source:LSAT

Try to find the conclusion.
The conclusion is: "news media is sometimes guided by moral principle".
For the conclusion to be true, the author gives some evidence that the network withheld some information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.
In order to strengthen the argument, one must find that a way to show that what the news media did was endorsed by moral principle OR to show that if it had disclosed the information, its ratings would have increased.
Answer choice B does one of the above mentioned tasks.
Show more

But then there is a downside too that if it didn't predict the winner correctly it will lose the ranking.
So its not guided by moral principal but simple mathematics.

I think it should be A. The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President but it still didn't use it media to further its cause. so that's morality.


Marcab daagh Pl help
User avatar
ShashankDave
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2013
Last visit: 26 Jan 2020
Posts: 215
Own Kudos:
303
Given Kudos: 872
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
Schools: McDonough '21 (A) Kelley '21 ISB '21 (I)
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GPA: 3
Schools: McDonough '21 (A) Kelley '21 ISB '21 (I)
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
Posts: 215
Kudos: 303
The news media is often accused of being willing to do 16 Apr 2016, 02:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abrakadabra21
Marcab
targetgmatchotu
The news media is often accused of being willing to do anything for ratings. However, recent action by a television network indicates that the news media is sometimes guided by moral principle. This network had discovered through polling voters on the east coast that the Republican candidate for President had garnered enough votes to ensure victory before the polls closed on the west coast. However, the network withheld this information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.
Which one of the following most strengthens the argument?
(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President.
(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner.
(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed.
(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race.
(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers.
source:LSAT

Try to find the conclusion.
The conclusion is: "news media is sometimes guided by moral principle".
For the conclusion to be true, the author gives some evidence that the network withheld some information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.
In order to strengthen the argument, one must find that a way to show that what the news media did was endorsed by moral principle OR to show that if it had disclosed the information, its ratings would have increased.
Answer choice B does one of the above mentioned tasks.

But then there is a downside too that if it didn't predict the winner correctly it will lose the ranking.
So its not guided by moral principal but simple mathematics.

I think it should be A. The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President but it still didn't use it media to further its cause. so that's morality.


Marcab daagh Pl help
Show more

Hey! IMO B

Let me try to explain

Conclusion: The news was guided by morals.

Now..lets pay attention to whats written in the passage
It clearly says that --> News networks are accused of driving their decisions by the ratings they receive. But one of those news networks(we'll call it N) drove its decisions by morals instead.

Paying attention to B
It says: The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner.

That means there are only two outcomes


1. It predicts the correct winner and wins ratings.
2. It predicts the wrong winner and wins ratings.

The common point between the two being that the news channel HAS TO PREDICT A WINNER.
But we know from the passage that,N got to know about the winner from its sources before the results were out. Even then, N kept the information secret, thereby possibly risking its ratings.
User avatar
eliaslatour
User avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2017
Last visit: 22 Jun 2017
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
60
Status:GMAT tutor
GMAT 1: 770 Q49 V47
GMAT 1: 770 Q49 V47
Posts: 18
Kudos: 60
The news media is often accused of being willing to do 15 May 2017, 08:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rohan2345
The news media is often accused of being willing to do anything for ratings. However, recent action by a television network indicates that the news media is sometimes guided by moral principle. This network had discovered through polling voters on the east coast that the Republican candidate for President had garnered enough votes to ensure victory before the polls closed on the west coast. However, the network withheld this information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.

Which one of the following most strengthens the argument?

(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President.
(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner.
(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed.
(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race.
(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers.
Show more

Our job is to strengthen the argument. What is the conclusion? It is: The news media [are] sometimes guided by moral principle.

Why? Because a specific network had discovered that the Republican candidate had garnered enough votes to ensure victory before the polls closed. Nevertheless, the network withheld this information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.

What's the assumption? The assumption is that this decision was made on moral principle rather than on self-interest or other factors. If, for example, we could show that making the announcement would have resulted in a loss of sponsors or ratings then we could argue that the real reason was self-interest.

So our job is to show that other possible reasons (money, prestige, ratings, etc.) were not a factor.

Answer choice (A) is irrelevant information. The argument is about key congressional races not about the president.
Answer choice (B) is the credited response. Since the network could have benefited by announcing the winner but it did not do so, the decision must have been guided by principle.
Answer choice (C) is irrelevant. We are not interested in other networks.
Answer choice (D) is the opposite answer. If the network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race, then the decision may well have been guided more by rational self-interest than by principle.
Answer choice (E) is also the opposite answer. If the network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race might anger Congress enough to cause legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers, then the decision may well have been guided more by rational self-interest than by principle.
User avatar
ravigupta2912
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2019
Last visit: 16 Feb 2025
Posts: 717
Own Kudos:
299
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
Schools: Said '23 IESE '24 LBS '24 (D) ISB '23 (WA) INSEAD Aug 22 intake (D) Judge '23 (D)
GMAT 1: 650 Q46 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 2.58
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Said '23 IESE '24 LBS '24 (D) ISB '23 (WA) INSEAD Aug 22 intake (D) Judge '23 (D)
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 717
Kudos: 299
The news media is often accused of being willing to do 13 Mar 2021, 22:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument is the counterpremise, which says "media will do anything for ratings" isn't necessarily true and it is sometimes driven by moral principles. To buttress the claim, the author presents an eg of how the media withdrew its information of knowing the winner so as to not affect outcome of polls.

We have to strengthen the argument that there was a moral angle to it.

(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President. -- Not relevant. Doesn't tell us if the media was guided by a moral principle if at all?

(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner. -- This choice gives us reasons to believe that had media exploited that knowledge, it would have gained ratings. (and yet it did not do so). Therefore, the media isn't willing to *do anything* for ratings and perhaps is sometimes guided by moral principals. Correct choice.

(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed. -- Not relevant to the argument. If at all, potentially a weakener if that rival network also knew of the information.

(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race. -- In this case the actions would be guided by do *anything for ratings* and hence would weaken our argument. Incorrect.

(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers. -- Not relevant to our argument. Eliminate.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,420
Own Kudos:
1,010
Posts: 19,420
Kudos: 1,010
The news media is often accused of being willing to do 19 May 2024, 23:53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
507 posts
bhanu29
363 posts