Only some strains of the tobacco plant are naturally resistant to toba

Question

Only some strains of the tobacco plant are naturally resistant to tobacco mosaic virus, never becoming diseased even when infected. When resistant strains were experimentally infected with the virus, levels of naturally occurring salicylic acid in these plants increased fivefold: no such increase occurred in the nonresistant plants. In a second experiment, 50 nonresistant tobacco plants were exposed to tobacco mosaic virus, and 25 of them were injected with salicylic acid. None of these 25 plants showed signs of infection, however, the other 25 plants succumbed to the disease.

Which one of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by the results of the experiments?

(A) Tobacco plants that have become diseased by infection with tobacco mosaic virus can be cured by injecting them with salicylic acid.

(B) Producing salicylic acid is at least part of the mechanism by which some tobacco plants naturally resist the disease caused by tobacco mosaic virus.

(C) Salicylic acid is not produced in strains of tobacco plants that are not resistant to tobacco mosaic virus.

(D) It is possible to test an uninfected tobacco plant for resistance to tobacco mosaic virus by measuring the level of salicylic acid it contains.

(E) The production of salicylic acid in certain strains of tobacco plants can be increased and thus the strains made resistant to tobacco mosaic virus.

mikemcgarry · Accepted Answer

Dear Not Random , I'm happy to help. :-)

I don't know the source of this question, but it is a very high quality question, and reflects well the priorities of scientific research. You see, at its core, science is a very conservative undertaking, and given a bit of evidence, scientists are generally willing to offer only the most limited of conclusions. Some things to consider about this scenario (1) We know the resistant plants make a ton of salicylic acid, but we don't know that salicylic acid is absent in the non-resistant plants --- just that they don't have a big increase of it when they get infected. (2) We don't know whether the plants that were able to resist the virus resisted purely because of salicylic acid, or because of some synergistic combination of salicylic acid and some other factor. Maybe the salicylic acid stimulates the plant to secrete something else, and this something else fights the virus. There are many possibilities to consider. (A) Tobacco plants that have become diseased by infection with tobacco mosaic virus can be cured by injecting them with salicylic acid. This entire argument is about prevention --- preventing the tobacco plants from getting the disease. There are all kinds of things (e.g. inoculations) that work wonderful as prevention before someone has the disease, but do absolutely nothing to cure the disease in someone who already has it. (B) Producing salicylic acid is at least part of the mechanism by which some tobacco plants naturally resist the disease caused by tobacco mosaic virus. This is very conservative, in the manner of the scientific method. The evidence suggests that the salicylic acid must plan some role. This is promising. (C) Salicylic acid is not produced in strains of tobacco plants that are not resistant to tobacco mosaic virus . This is the error discussed in #1 above. (D) It is possible to test an uninfected tobacco plant for resistance to tobacco mosaic virus by measuring the level of salicylic acid it contains. Hmmm. Is it the level of salicylic acid, or the rate of increase in salicylic acid that makes a difference? This is not clear from the passage, so this choice is not a clear conclusion. (E) The production of salicylic acid in certain strains of tobacco plants can be increased and thus the strains made resistant to tobacco mosaic virus. Hmm. That first part is really iffy ---- could we genetically engineer the tobacco plants so that they produce more salicylic acid? Maybe, or maybe not. Genetic engineering can certainly do a whole lot, but could it do this? Unclear. Therefore, we don't know whether the production of salicylic acid could be increased by human intervention. The best answer, really the only viable answer, is (B) . Does all this make sense? Mike :-)

devikeerthansr · Answer

(A) Tobacco plants that have become diseased by infection with tobacco mosaic virus can be cured by injecting them with salicylic acid.  Text does not say that diseased plant can be cured 
(B) Producing salicylic acid is at least part of the mechanism by which some tobacco plants naturally resist the disease caused by tobacco mosaic virus.  correct 
(C) Salicylic acid is not produced in strains of tobacco plants that are not resistant to tobacco mosaic virus.  It is not true. The text says that naturally occurring acid.  
(D) It is possible to test an uninfected tobacco plant for resistance to tobacco mosaic virus by measuring the level of salicylic acid it contains.  Text does not state that 
(E) The production of salicylic acid in certain strains of tobacco plants can be increased and thus the strains made resistant to tobacco mosaic virus.  Text does not state it. If you are going to inject acid then levels can be increased for any tobacco plant

sssanskaar · Answer

Comes down to only B and D.

Option B is the clear winner as we can see that the immunity of tobacco plants is dependent on the levels of salicylic acid present in the plants at the time of the infection.

unraveled · Answer

Only some strains of the tobacco plant are naturally resistant to tobacco mosaic virus, never becoming diseased even when infected. When resistant strains were experimentally infected with the virus,  levels of naturally occurring salicylic acid in these plants increased fivefold: no such increase occurred in the nonresistant plants.  In a second experiment, 50 nonresistant tobacco plants were exposed to tobacco mosaic virus, and 25 of them were injected with salicylic acid. None of these 25 plants showed signs of infection, however, the other 25 plants succumbed to the disease.

Which one of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by the results of the experiments?

(A) Tobacco  plants that have become diseased  by infection with tobacco mosaic virus  can be cured  by injecting them with salicylic acid. - WRONG. After dying how can a plant be cured.

(B) Producing salicylic acid is at least part of the mechanism by which some tobacco plants naturally resist the disease caused by tobacco mosaic virus.

(C) Salicylic acid is  not produced  in strains of tobacco plants that are not resistant to tobacco mosaic virus. - WRONG. Refer the second half of the blue highlighted text.

(D) It is possible to  test an uninfected tobacco plant for resistance to tobacco mosaic virus  by measuring the  level of salicylic acid  it contains. - WRONG. No such measuring ability can be inferred.

(E) The production of salicylic acid in certain strains of tobacco plants  can be increased  and thus the strains made resistant to tobacco mosaic virus. - WRONG. Goes against the fact that the increase is 'natural'.

Answer B.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

Only some strains of the tobacco plant are naturally resistant to toba

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Only some strains of the tobacco plant are naturally resistant to toba

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards