Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 21:05 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 21:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
apoorv601
Joined: 21 May 2015
Last visit: 27 Nov 2017
Posts: 197
Own Kudos:
400
 [25]
Given Kudos: 57
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
24
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
VeritasPrepBrandon
User avatar
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Last visit: 07 Jun 2016
Posts: 143
Own Kudos:
958
 [5]
Given Kudos: 9
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 143
Kudos: 958
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
camlan1990
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Last visit: 19 Sep 2016
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
270
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 95
Kudos: 270
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VeritasPrepBrandon
User avatar
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Last visit: 07 Jun 2016
Posts: 143
Own Kudos:
958
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 143
Kudos: 958
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
camlan1990
apoorv601
Supporters of a costly new Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
initiative assert that the project will benefit industrial companies as well as the
military itself. In many instances, military research has resulted in technologies
that have fueled corporate development and growth, and this pattern can be
expected to continue.

Each of the following, if true, serves to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) The research initiative will occupy many talented scientists, many of whom
would otherwise have worked for private corporations.

(B) In the past decade, DARPA has adopted an increasingly restrictive stance
regarding the use of intellectual property resulting from its research.

(C) If the DARPA initiative hadn't been approved, much of the funding would
instead have been directed toward tax breaks for various businesses.

(D) At any given time, DARPA is conducting a wide variety of costly research
projects.

(E) The research initiative is focused on defense mechanisms that will reduce
injury to soldiers during combat, a need that is nonexistent for private corporations.
OA is D or E. I am so confused why D is right because it is OUT OF SCOPE

D is correct, and your rationale is exactly why it is correct. Look at the question...each weakens EXCEPT. An answer choice that is out of scope cannot weaken an argument, and the other 4 do weaken the argument, making D correct.
User avatar
282552
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 02 Nov 2018
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 368
Location: United States
Schools: IIMA PGPX"20
Schools: IIMA PGPX"20
Posts: 80
Kudos: 358
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepBrandon
In this question, we want to find the one answer that does not weaken the argument. That means that the correct answer can strengthen the argument, or it can just be completely out of scope and irrelevant to the argument. The argument is that military research has historically resulted in technologies that have fueled corporate growth, and therefore this new DARPA research initiative will benefit industrial companies as well. This is a very poor "because it happened in the past, it will happen again in the future" argument, making it easy to include a bunch of incorrect weaken answer choices.

A - This weakens the argument. If the research initiative consumes industrial company resources (their brainpower), then it is very likely to hurt and not help those companies.

B - This weakens because if DARPA has a more restrictive stance regarding the use of their IP than they did in the past, then even if they make the same caliber of advancements as in the past the corporations are less likely to benefit from these advancements because DARPA is less likely to share them.

C - This is a similar weakener to answer choice A - if the initiative utilizes resources that would have benefited the companies then that is bad for the companies

D - This is completely out of scope and is thus our correct answer. Whatever else DARPA is working on has nothing to do with this argument. The argument is solely focused on this one research initiative helping corporations.

E - This weakens because if the technology developed is of no use to corporations, then corporations are unlikely to benefit from this initiative.

I hope this helps!

Why OPtion A is a weakener. The conclusion says that Project will benefit Military and Companies. If the companies are getting benefited by money spent by military then why do they care.
Can anybody shed some light on my rationale ?
User avatar
rulingbear
Joined: 03 May 2017
Last visit: 03 Oct 2018
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 57
Kudos: 58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
282552
VeritasPrepBrandon
In this question, we want to find the one answer that does not weaken the argument. That means that the correct answer can strengthen the argument, or it can just be completely out of scope and irrelevant to the argument. The argument is that military research has historically resulted in technologies that have fueled corporate growth, and therefore this new DARPA research initiative will benefit industrial companies as well. This is a very poor "because it happened in the past, it will happen again in the future" argument, making it easy to include a bunch of incorrect weaken answer choices.

A - This weakens the argument. If the research initiative consumes industrial company resources (their brainpower), then it is very likely to hurt and not help those companies.

B - This weakens because if DARPA has a more restrictive stance regarding the use of their IP than they did in the past, then even if they make the same caliber of advancements as in the past the corporations are less likely to benefit from these advancements because DARPA is less likely to share them.

C - This is a similar weakener to answer choice A - if the initiative utilizes resources that would have benefited the companies then that is bad for the companies

D - This is completely out of scope and is thus our correct answer. Whatever else DARPA is working on has nothing to do with this argument. The argument is solely focused on this one research initiative helping corporations.

E - This weakens because if the technology developed is of no use to corporations, then corporations are unlikely to benefit from this initiative.

I hope this helps!

Why OPtion A is a weakener. The conclusion says that Project will benefit Military and Companies. If the companies are getting benefited by money spent by military then why do they care.
Can anybody shed some light on my rationale ?

Option A weakens the argument that DARPA research benefits corporations, it is causing a brain drain in the corporations. Well the companies care because they could be using the researchers for their own preferred benefits now, and not have to wait for the benefits that DARPA research may generate.

Best,
User avatar
PhantomAY
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 21 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 May 2021
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
55
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Status:Aim for the moon. If you miss, you may hit a star.
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.63
WE:Project Management (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 50
Kudos: 55
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
apoorv601
Supporters of a costly new Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) initiative assert that the project will benefit industrial companies as well as the military itself. In many instances, military research has resulted in technologies that have fueled corporate development and growth, and this pattern can be expected to continue.

Each of the following, if true, serves to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) The research initiative will occupy many talented scientists, many of whom would otherwise have worked for private corporations.
(B) In the past decade, DARPA has adopted an increasingly restrictive stance regarding the use of intellectual property resulting from its research.
(C) If the DARPA initiative hadn't been approved, much of the funding would instead have been directed toward tax breaks for various businesses.
(D) At any given time, DARPA is conducting a wide variety of costly research projects.
(E) The research initiative is focused on defense mechanisms that will reduce injury to soldiers during combat, a need that is nonexistent for private corporations.

Conclusion: costly new DARPA project will benefit industrial companies as well as military itself
Premise: military research output techs that could fuel corporate development
Premise: this pattern will continue

Question: not weaken answer

Answers:
A) weaken: even though the resulting tech might benefit corporate, but "many talented scientists" will NOT be able work for them directly which could jeopardize their growth - undermining the benefit
B) weaken: even though the tech might potentially benefit corporate, the restrictive regulation could end in nothing solid in applications in reality
C) weaken: without the project the corporate will still benefit from tax breaks, a factor favoring "not supporting the project"
D) a soft strengthen: indicating the projects might results a good variety of techs the fits most of the needs of corporate"
E) weaken: "focus" indicate at least large portion of the resources are spent on military only requirement, which means very limited benefit for corporate
User avatar
Alilee
Joined: 10 Jun 2023
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
Posts: 17
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Argument: Funding to DARPA not only helps military but also businsses.
Goal: NOT weaken

(A) The research initiative will occupy many talented scientists, many of whom would otherwise have worked for private corporations.
Weaken. Becuase who knows if the talents could have been more beneficial in businesses than withim the DARPA

(C) If the DARPA initiative hadn't been approved, much of the funding would instead have been directed toward tax breaks for various businesses.
Weaken. This is a tricky one.

This is talking about benefits to businesses from tax perspective which is still a benefit if the money was not in DARPA
(D) At any given time, DARPA is conducting a wide variety of costly research projects.
CORRECT. This one doesn't argue against or for anyting which means it's not weaken.

apoorv601
Supporters of a costly new Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) initiative assert that the project will benefit industrial companies as well as the military itself. In many instances, military research has resulted in technologies that have fueled corporate development and growth, and this pattern can be expected to continue.

Each of the following, if true, serves to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) The research initiative will occupy many talented scientists, many of whom would otherwise have worked for private corporations.
(B) In the past decade, DARPA has adopted an increasingly restrictive stance regarding the use of intellectual property resulting from its research.
(C) If the DARPA initiative hadn't been approved, much of the funding would instead have been directed toward tax breaks for various businesses.
(D) At any given time, DARPA is conducting a wide variety of costly research projects.
(E) The research initiative is focused on defense mechanisms that will reduce injury to soldiers during combat, a need that is nonexistent for private corporations.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,433
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Your Logic: "If companies get technology benefits from military research, why does it matter if they lose some scientists?"

The Problem: You're assuming that indirect benefit (technology spillover) automatically replaces direct benefit (having those scientists work for you). But these are additive, not substitutes!

Here's the key mechanism:

Without DARPA project:
- Company has talented scientists working directly for them = Direct Benefit

With DARPA project:
- Company loses those scientists to DARPA = Loss of Direct Benefit
- Company might get some technology transfer later = Uncertain Indirect Benefit

Net effect: Companies lose something concrete (talent) in exchange for something uncertain (potential technology). That's a weakener!

Simple analogy:
If I take your chef and promise you might get some recipes back someday - have I benefited you? No! You lost your chef!

Option A shows companies LOSE something valuable (direct access to talent) - this weakens the claim that "companies will benefit."

Answer: D - This is the EXCEPT because it merely states DARPA runs many projects. It tells us nothing about whether this specific project will benefit companies or not. It's just background noise - neither strengthens nor weakens.
282552


Why OPtion A is a weakener. The conclusion says that Project will benefit Military and Companies. If the companies are getting benefited by money spent by military then why do they care.
Can anybody shed some light on my rationale ?
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts