Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 09:03 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 09:03
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,829
Own Kudos:
51,902
 [11]
Given Kudos: 6,334
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,829
Kudos: 51,902
 [11]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,481
Own Kudos:
5,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,481
Kudos: 5,779
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
chessassistant
Joined: 05 May 2017
Last visit: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,481
Own Kudos:
5,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,481
Kudos: 5,779
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chessassistant
I want to ask one question that is not related to this topic.

requires that V-infinive (be, go, etc) as a subjunctive
then it is required that also a subjunctive, right?

Hi,

Can you please be a bit more clear on your question? It is not clear what is your concern. Is it related to tense form or something else.

If tense form, then yes 'require' in any tense form, along with 'that', makes a subjunctive verb.
User avatar
Nightmare007
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 426
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 426
Kudos: 447
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Stem analysis :
This question is an Weaken Except question :
Conclusion :
Measures failure ---> increase in dengue cases.

A :- Provides an alternate cause of increase in cases. - weakens
B :- Another alternate cause - ppl coming from other states with dengue increased - weakens .
C :- Yet another alternate cause - Better testing procedure is introduced. - weakens.
D :- Same as B . migration has caused - Weakens
E :- It says indeed the measures to control those bugs have failed. Strengthens a bit.

Hence, answer is E.
User avatar
kill3rlook5
Joined: 14 Dec 2016
Last visit: 24 Apr 2019
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
104
 [2]
Given Kudos: 158
Status:Searching for something I've been searching..LOL
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Operations
Schools: Ross '20
GMAT 1: 590 Q35 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE:Medicine and Health (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Schools: Ross '20
GMAT 1: 590 Q35 V42
Posts: 46
Kudos: 104
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question stem is asking us for an option which does not weaken the conclusion...:

Conclusion : Mosquito control measures have failed and have lead to the increase in dengue cases.

Any option that supports the conclusion will be our answer.

Only option E strengthens the conclusion by giving reasons to prove that mosquito control measures have indeed failed and the incidence of malaria due to mosquito bites has actually increased.

Other options give reasons to prove that mosquito control measures have worked and the rise in incidence is attributable to other causes viz. immigration.


Hence, answer is E.


HIT THE KUDOS BUTTON IF YOU FOUND IT HELPFUL...P.S ...IT DOESNT COST ANYTHING :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,181
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The number of people diagnosed with dengue fever (which is contracted from the bite of an infected mosquito) in North India this year is twice the number diagnosed last year. The authorities have concluded that measures to control the mosquito population have failed in this region.

All of the following, if true, would cast doubt on the authorities conclusion except

A. more cases are now reported because of increases in administrative efficiency

B. a very high proportion of the cases were in people who had recently returned from neighboring countries

C. an effective diagnostic test was introduced about nine months ago

D. the disease is prevalent only in some industrialized areas which have shown a dramatic increase in population due to migration

E. the incidence (number of cases per thousand) of malaria, also contracted from mosquito bites, has increased

The correct answer here is E. This is a "weaken the argument" question, but it is also an "Except" question. What this means is that rather than looking for one option that weakens the conclusion, we're looking to eliminate 4 options that all weaken the conclusion.

A - This certainly weakens the argument. It provides an alternative explanation for the increased number of reported cases which suggests that the methods have not failed, we just have better stats now. OUT

B - This also weakens the argument. If most or even many of the cases are from people who were not from the region being tested, then it invalidates the conclusion that measures taken in the region didn't work. OUT

C - If a new test was introduced within the last year, it would account for differences in the number of reported cases, and therefore provide an alternative explanation as to why the numbers didn't go down. OUT

D - This is wrong for the same reason that B is wrong. The fact that it is prevalent only in some areas does nothing to weaken the conclusion, but the point about migration is the same as in B. If the people with the disease are not from the region in which the measures were taken, we cannot say that the measures taken failed. OUT

E - Must be right by elimination. If we know that malaria has gone up as well, it certainly cannot be the case that the measures didn't fail, since it suggests that there are more of the mosquitoes now. This actually even strengthens the argumentCORRECT

Although it didn't apply to this question, it is important to remember that a "Weaken [except] the argument" question doesn't mean that you have to strengthen the argument. It simply means that you have to "NOT weaken". For this reason, you're best off trying to eliminate the other four options that actually do weaken it.

- Matoo
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,829
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,334
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,829
Kudos: 51,902
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

The authorities conclude that measures to control mosquitoes have failed. We need to find something that does not contradict that conclusion. But first we need to find the four items that do cast doubt on that conclusion. If the disease is contracted in another country, or if numbers reported are increasing because of better tests or reporting methods, or simply because the human population is increasing, then we cannot conclude that control measures have failed. However, if the incidence of another mosquito-borne disease is increasing, it is more likely to indicate that mosquitoes are not controlled.

Answer: E
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts