Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 08:59 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 08:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
SaGa
Joined: 15 Mar 2017
Last visit: 28 May 2018
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
239
 [13]
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
Posts: 27
Kudos: 239
 [13]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,712
Own Kudos:
37,837
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4,925
Posts: 4,712
Kudos: 37,837
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ari.banerjee
Joined: 31 Mar 2017
Last visit: 03 Oct 2020
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 174
Location: Canada
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V24
GMAT 2: 540 Q31 V34
GMAT 3: 590 Q36 V34
GMAT 4: 600 Q42 V30
GRE 1: Q159 V152
GPA: 4
GMAT 4: 600 Q42 V30
GRE 1: Q159 V152
Posts: 132
Kudos: 136
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,451
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SaGa
Pieces of music consist of sounds and silences presented to the listener in a temporal order. A painting, in contrast, is not presented one part at a time to the viewer; there is thus no particular path that the viewer’s eye must follow in order to “read” the painting. Therefore, an essential distinction between the experiences of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because

(A) the argument does not allow for the possibility of being immersed in experiencing a painting without being conscious of the passage of time

(B) the argument is based on a very general definition of music that does not incorporate any distinctions among particular styles

(C) the argument fails to bring out the aspects of music and painting that are common to both as forms of artistic expression

(D) relying on the metaphor of “reading” to characterize how a painting is viewed presupposes the correctness of the conclusion to be drawn on the basis of that characterization

(E) the absence of a particular path that the eye must follow does not entail that the eye follows no path.

LSAT

PREMISE: We EXPERIENCE music in a temporal order.
PREMISE: A painting is not PRESENTED one part at a time
PREMISE: There is no particular path that the viewer’s eye MUST follow
CONCLUSION: A distinction between the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

IMPORTANT: The conclusion is about the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings.
The first premise addresses the EXPERIENCE of hearing music temporally, but the other two premises just tell us that there is no PRESET temporal path to view paintings. This, however, does not mean there is no temporal aspect to viewing a painting. It only means that there is no PRESET temporal aspect.
For example, some people might view a painting from left to right (temporally), other might view a painting from top to bottom (temporally) etc.

Given all of this, the best answer is E

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,426
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,426
Kudos: 1,508
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPrepNow
SaGa
Pieces of music consist of sounds and silences presented to the listener in a temporal order. A painting, in contrast, is not presented one part at a time to the viewer; there is thus no particular path that the viewer’s eye must follow in order to “read” the painting. Therefore, an essential distinction between the experiences of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because

(A) the argument does not allow for the possibility of being immersed in experiencing a painting without being conscious of the passage of time

(B) the argument is based on a very general definition of music that does not incorporate any distinctions among particular styles

(C) the argument fails to bring out the aspects of music and painting that are common to both as forms of artistic expression

(D) relying on the metaphor of “reading” to characterize how a painting is viewed presupposes the correctness of the conclusion to be drawn on the basis of that characterization

(E) the absence of a particular path that the eye must follow does not entail that the eye follows no path.

LSAT

PREMISE: We EXPERIENCE music in a temporal order.
PREMISE: A painting is not PRESENTED one part at a time
PREMISE: There is no particular path that the viewer’s eye MUST follow
CONCLUSION: A distinction between the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

IMPORTANT: The conclusion is about the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings.
The first premise addresses the EXPERIENCE of hearing music temporally, but the other two premises just tell us that there is no PRESET temporal path to view paintings. This, however, does not mean there is no temporal aspect to viewing a painting. It only means that there is no PRESET temporal aspect.
For example, some people might view a painting from left to right (temporally), other might view a painting from top to bottom (temporally) etc.

Given all of this, the best answer is E

Cheers,
Brent

Dear Brent,

can you -lease shed light why D is wrong?
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,451
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mo2men
GMATPrepNow
SaGa
Pieces of music consist of sounds and silences presented to the listener in a temporal order. A painting, in contrast, is not presented one part at a time to the viewer; there is thus no particular path that the viewer’s eye must follow in order to “read” the painting. Therefore, an essential distinction between the experiences of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because

(A) the argument does not allow for the possibility of being immersed in experiencing a painting without being conscious of the passage of time

(B) the argument is based on a very general definition of music that does not incorporate any distinctions among particular styles

(C) the argument fails to bring out the aspects of music and painting that are common to both as forms of artistic expression

(D) relying on the metaphor of “reading” to characterize how a painting is viewed presupposes the correctness of the conclusion to be drawn on the basis of that characterization

(E) the absence of a particular path that the eye must follow does not entail that the eye follows no path.

LSAT

PREMISE: We EXPERIENCE music in a temporal order.
PREMISE: A painting is not PRESENTED one part at a time
PREMISE: There is no particular path that the viewer’s eye MUST follow
CONCLUSION: A distinction between the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

IMPORTANT: The conclusion is about the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings.
The first premise addresses the EXPERIENCE of hearing music temporally, but the other two premises just tell us that there is no PRESET temporal path to view paintings. This, however, does not mean there is no temporal aspect to viewing a painting. It only means that there is no PRESET temporal aspect.
For example, some people might view a painting from left to right (temporally), other might view a painting from top to bottom (temporally) etc.

Given all of this, the best answer is E

Cheers,
Brent

Dear Brent,

can you -lease shed light why D is wrong?

You bet.

(D) relying on the metaphor of “reading” to characterize how a painting is viewed presupposes the correctness of the conclusion to be drawn on the basis of that characterization
The author doesn't use the metaphor to characterize how a painting IS viewed. The author uses the metaphor to characterize how a painting is NOT viewed.

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts