Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 16:12 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 16:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
SaGa
Joined: 15 Mar 2017
Last visit: 28 May 2018
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
235
 [13]
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
Posts: 27
Kudos: 235
 [13]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
37,011
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,011
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ari.banerjee
Joined: 31 Mar 2017
Last visit: 03 Oct 2020
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 174
Location: Canada
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V24
GMAT 2: 540 Q31 V34
GMAT 3: 590 Q36 V34
GMAT 4: 600 Q42 V30
GRE 1: Q159 V152
GPA: 4
GMAT 4: 600 Q42 V30
GRE 1: Q159 V152
Posts: 132
Kudos: 136
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,331
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SaGa
Pieces of music consist of sounds and silences presented to the listener in a temporal order. A painting, in contrast, is not presented one part at a time to the viewer; there is thus no particular path that the viewer’s eye must follow in order to “read” the painting. Therefore, an essential distinction between the experiences of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because

(A) the argument does not allow for the possibility of being immersed in experiencing a painting without being conscious of the passage of time

(B) the argument is based on a very general definition of music that does not incorporate any distinctions among particular styles

(C) the argument fails to bring out the aspects of music and painting that are common to both as forms of artistic expression

(D) relying on the metaphor of “reading” to characterize how a painting is viewed presupposes the correctness of the conclusion to be drawn on the basis of that characterization

(E) the absence of a particular path that the eye must follow does not entail that the eye follows no path.

LSAT

PREMISE: We EXPERIENCE music in a temporal order.
PREMISE: A painting is not PRESENTED one part at a time
PREMISE: There is no particular path that the viewer’s eye MUST follow
CONCLUSION: A distinction between the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

IMPORTANT: The conclusion is about the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings.
The first premise addresses the EXPERIENCE of hearing music temporally, but the other two premises just tell us that there is no PRESET temporal path to view paintings. This, however, does not mean there is no temporal aspect to viewing a painting. It only means that there is no PRESET temporal aspect.
For example, some people might view a painting from left to right (temporally), other might view a painting from top to bottom (temporally) etc.

Given all of this, the best answer is E

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,439
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,439
Kudos: 1,478
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPrepNow
SaGa
Pieces of music consist of sounds and silences presented to the listener in a temporal order. A painting, in contrast, is not presented one part at a time to the viewer; there is thus no particular path that the viewer’s eye must follow in order to “read” the painting. Therefore, an essential distinction between the experiences of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because

(A) the argument does not allow for the possibility of being immersed in experiencing a painting without being conscious of the passage of time

(B) the argument is based on a very general definition of music that does not incorporate any distinctions among particular styles

(C) the argument fails to bring out the aspects of music and painting that are common to both as forms of artistic expression

(D) relying on the metaphor of “reading” to characterize how a painting is viewed presupposes the correctness of the conclusion to be drawn on the basis of that characterization

(E) the absence of a particular path that the eye must follow does not entail that the eye follows no path.

LSAT

PREMISE: We EXPERIENCE music in a temporal order.
PREMISE: A painting is not PRESENTED one part at a time
PREMISE: There is no particular path that the viewer’s eye MUST follow
CONCLUSION: A distinction between the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

IMPORTANT: The conclusion is about the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings.
The first premise addresses the EXPERIENCE of hearing music temporally, but the other two premises just tell us that there is no PRESET temporal path to view paintings. This, however, does not mean there is no temporal aspect to viewing a painting. It only means that there is no PRESET temporal aspect.
For example, some people might view a painting from left to right (temporally), other might view a painting from top to bottom (temporally) etc.

Given all of this, the best answer is E

Cheers,
Brent

Dear Brent,

can you -lease shed light why D is wrong?
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,331
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mo2men
GMATPrepNow
SaGa
Pieces of music consist of sounds and silences presented to the listener in a temporal order. A painting, in contrast, is not presented one part at a time to the viewer; there is thus no particular path that the viewer’s eye must follow in order to “read” the painting. Therefore, an essential distinction between the experiences of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because

(A) the argument does not allow for the possibility of being immersed in experiencing a painting without being conscious of the passage of time

(B) the argument is based on a very general definition of music that does not incorporate any distinctions among particular styles

(C) the argument fails to bring out the aspects of music and painting that are common to both as forms of artistic expression

(D) relying on the metaphor of “reading” to characterize how a painting is viewed presupposes the correctness of the conclusion to be drawn on the basis of that characterization

(E) the absence of a particular path that the eye must follow does not entail that the eye follows no path.

LSAT

PREMISE: We EXPERIENCE music in a temporal order.
PREMISE: A painting is not PRESENTED one part at a time
PREMISE: There is no particular path that the viewer’s eye MUST follow
CONCLUSION: A distinction between the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings is that hearing music has a temporal dimension but viewing a painting has none.

IMPORTANT: The conclusion is about the EXPERIENCES of hearing music and of viewing paintings.
The first premise addresses the EXPERIENCE of hearing music temporally, but the other two premises just tell us that there is no PRESET temporal path to view paintings. This, however, does not mean there is no temporal aspect to viewing a painting. It only means that there is no PRESET temporal aspect.
For example, some people might view a painting from left to right (temporally), other might view a painting from top to bottom (temporally) etc.

Given all of this, the best answer is E

Cheers,
Brent

Dear Brent,

can you -lease shed light why D is wrong?

You bet.

(D) relying on the metaphor of “reading” to characterize how a painting is viewed presupposes the correctness of the conclusion to be drawn on the basis of that characterization
The author doesn't use the metaphor to characterize how a painting IS viewed. The author uses the metaphor to characterize how a painting is NOT viewed.

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts