Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 23:17 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 23:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,170
Own Kudos:
5,939
 [16]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,170
Kudos: 5,939
 [16]
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AshutoshB
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Last visit: 16 Jan 2022
Posts: 322
Own Kudos:
2,320
 [1]
Given Kudos: 348
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 322
Kudos: 2,320
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Nightmare007
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 426
Own Kudos:
447
 [1]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 426
Kudos: 447
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
krish76
Joined: 16 Jan 2018
Last visit: 17 Feb 2020
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 600 Q40 V33
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q40 V33
Posts: 44
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A) painting cost is at least equal. negate - painting cost over lifetime is < wooden build cost. so, total cost is less 2x of built cost.
Brick build cost is greater than 2x of wooden. The argument falls apart since even if painting and repainting brick is more easy on the pocket. HOLD

B) hmm..as long as it is more than 5 we can't conclude much. stem doesnt say how much one painting costs. IGNORE

C) Don't care. IGNORE

D) negate. cost of re/paint not equal to brick built. is it less or more? if less than go with wood. if more then build brick house. Good option but A is superior. IGNORE


E) probably a trap. The conclusion specifically talks about money and brick vs wood. IGNORE

Answer A
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,170
Own Kudos:
5,939
 [1]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,170
Kudos: 5,939
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise:
1. brick vs wood exterior. cost of brick exterior =~ 2x cost of wood exterior.
2. wood exterior need to repaint every five years, in case of heavy rainfall, more often then not.
3. Conclusion : Over all wood one is more costly then brick one.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which the argument above relies?
A. The cost of painting and repainting a wooden house over its lifetime is at least equal to the cost of installing a wood exterior in the first place. --- So this way cost is almost equal to brick wall installation in least case. but in any other case this cost will be more then brick wall life time cost. on nigation , conclusion falls. A is the correct option
User avatar
captain0612
Joined: 10 Apr 2020
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 128
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q90 V82 DI78
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 7
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q90 V82 DI78
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 110
Kudos: 124
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In my opinion, the options to this question are very poorly structured. Option A and Option D both mean the same thing, which is the cost of painting and re-painting is greater than the cost of Installing them freshly.

Because of a lack of Quality checks, students like me often waste time understanding and coming up with a way to find the answer, resulting in a very bad experience and time-consuming.

Can we add popularity/ rating to the question?
For example, OG questions will have a better rating or a question with discussions from Verbal Experts themselves.

Just a thought :) happy to help.

Bunuel bb
User avatar
AJ_1313
Joined: 12 Jun 2023
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
doubt between option A and option D. can someone explain?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,389
 [1]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,389
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aragonn
The two most popular external surfaces for homes in this state are brick and wood. In general, a brick exterior costs twice as much as a wood exterior to install. A major difference between these surfaces, however, is that wood exteriors need to be painted and repainted every five years or so, and even more frequently in areas with heavy rainfall. If people take into account the cost of painting and repainting, they will realize that a wood exterior is actually more expensive than brick over the lifetime of the house.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which the argument above relies?


A. The cost of painting and repainting a wooden house over its lifetime is at least equal to the cost of installing a wood exterior in the first place.

B. The average lifetime of a home in this state is 75 years.

C. A less expensive option than either wood or brick is a vinyl exterior, which does not require painting.

D. The cost of painting and repainting a wooden house over the expected lifetime of the house is equal to that of installing a brick exterior.

E. A wooden house that is not painted regularly will be subject to water damage, rot, and termite damage, which will decrease the resale value of the home.


Argument:

A brick exterior costs twice as much as a wood exterior to install. (Say wood installation - $x, Brick installation - $2x)

Wood exteriors need to be painted and repainted every five years or so

Conclusion: Accounting for re-painting, wood exterior is actually more expensive than brick over the lifetime of the house.

The author is saying that compared to brick ($2x installation cost), wood turns out to be more expensive overall i.e. more than $2x (counting the re-painting etc charges)
Since we know that the brick installation costs $x, this means that he is assuming that painting-re-painting charges will be more than $x (to be total more than $2x)


A. The cost of painting and repainting a wooden house over its lifetime is at least equal to the cost of installing a wood exterior in the first place.

He is assuming that cost of painting and repainting a wooden house is more than x (i.e. at least x). We know that cost of installing wood is $x.
So he is assuming that cost of re-painting is more than cost of wood installation.


D. The cost of painting and repainting a wooden house over the expected lifetime of the house is equal to that of installing a brick exterior.

This option is different. It says that cost of repainting (at least $x) is equal to cost of installing BRICK exterior ($2x).
But the author does not assume this. He assumes that cost of repainting is at least equal to cost of installing WOOD exterior ($x).
Incorrect

Other options are all irrelevant.

Answer (A)

AJ_1313
captain0612 - This question is fine, nothing wrong here.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts