Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 13:27 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 13:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Mar 2026
Posts: 841
Own Kudos:
2,716
 [17]
Given Kudos: 271
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 841
Kudos: 2,716
 [17]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,386
 [3]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,386
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
NRJ11090
Joined: 19 Mar 2018
Last visit: 22 May 2024
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q42 V31
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Energy)
GMAT 1: 600 Q42 V31
Posts: 55
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
100mitra
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Last visit: 06 Jul 2022
Posts: 707
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Status:Learning
Posts: 707
Kudos: 634
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
with all the options only B, and C can be related
(B) The mayor also used her influence to get time on a community channel for another news service, whose owner supported the mayor’s opponent in the last election.
- Major used her influence to support other news service, whos owner supported mayours' opponent in last election.

(C) Azco’s news coverage of the mayor has never been judged to be biased by an impartial, independent organization.
- Azco's new coverage is unbiased, can be eliminated, becasue its not about major but about Azco's new service

Answer B
avatar
pranavk08
Joined: 03 Apr 2020
Last visit: 15 Jun 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kindly help me to understand why (B) is the correct ans and NOT (C)
My reasoning mentioned below:

Of the following, which one, if true, is the logically strongest counter Randy can make to Marion’s objection?

(A) The owner of Azco supported the mayor simply because he liked her political agenda, and not for any expected reward.
Does not help to establish that the Mayor has nothing to gain by supporting Azco

(B) The mayor also used her influence to get time on a community channel for another news service, whose owner supported the mayor’s opponent in the last election.
What happened in the previous election is unreliable...The news service might have shifted their support now. Not clear from this statement.

(C) Azco’s news coverage of the mayor has never been judged to be biased by an impartial, independent organization.
Supporting an unbiased news channel establishes that Mayor has nothing personal to gain hence weakening Marion's objection

(D) The many people whose jobs depend on Azco’s continued presence on a community channel are a potential source of political support for the mayor.
Does the opposite. Again shows that mayor might get some benefit from the favor she offered to Azco

(E) The number of people who watch Mega Cable Television Company’s programming has decreased during the mayor’s term.
Irrelevant
User avatar
Sohan97
Joined: 17 May 2023
Last visit: 14 Jun 2024
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi there, a quick question -

As per "B"; if the other news channel was given special treatment this year just because the mayor wanted that channel's owner to vote for her this time (since last time the vote had gone to opponent) - would that not show that the mayor is influenced with dubious intentions?

GMATNinja KarishmaB please guide
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,129
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,798
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sohan97
Hi there, a quick question -

As per "B"; if the other news channel was given special treatment this year just because the mayor wanted that channel's owner to vote for her this time (since last time the vote had gone to opponent) - would that not show that the mayor is influenced with dubious intentions?

GMATNinja KarishmaB please guide
Randy and Marion present two possible motives for the mayor’s actions: “demonstrating her concern for keeping a diversity of news programming in the city” vs. “rewarding[…] a political supporter.” The evidence for this second possible motive is that Azco’s owner is a supporter.

(B) completely undermines that evidence by showing that the mayor helped out someone who is not a supporter. Attributing the mayor's action to any other reason would require assumptions that go beyond the words on the page.

That's why (B) doesn't show any dubious intentions on the mayor's part.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
KanikaJain
User avatar
HEC School Moderator
Joined: 06 Jan 2021
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 275
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q83 V84 DI79
GPA: 4
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q83 V84 DI79
Posts: 275
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Sohan97
Hi there, a quick question -

As per "B"; if the other news channel was given special treatment this year just because the mayor wanted that channel's owner to vote for her this time (since last time the vote had gone to opponent) - would that not show that the mayor is influenced with dubious intentions?

GMATNinja KarishmaB please guide
Randy and Marion present two possible motives for the mayor’s actions: “demonstrating her concern for keeping a diversity of news programming in the city” vs. “rewarding[...] a political supporter.” The evidence for this second possible motive is that Azco’s owner is a supporter.

(B) completely undermines that evidence by showing that the mayor helped out someone who is not a supporter. Attributing the mayor's action to any other reason would require assumptions that go beyond the words on the page.

That's why (B) doesn't show any dubious intentions on the mayor's part.

I hope that helps!

Why would this assumption go beyond?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,129
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,798
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KanikaJain
GMATNinja
Sohan97
Hi there, a quick question -

As per "B"; if the other news channel was given special treatment this year just because the mayor wanted that channel's owner to vote for her this time (since last time the vote had gone to opponent) - would that not show that the mayor is influenced with dubious intentions?

GMATNinja KarishmaB please guide

Randy and Marion present two possible motives for the mayor’s actions: “demonstrating her concern for keeping a diversity of news programming in the city” vs. “rewarding[...] a political supporter.” The evidence for this second possible motive is that Azco’s owner is a supporter.

(B) completely undermines that evidence by showing that the mayor helped out someone who is not a supporter. Attributing the mayor's action to any other reason would require assumptions that go beyond the words on the page.

That's why (B) doesn't show any dubious intentions on the mayor's part.

I hope that helps!

Why would this assumption go beyond?
Because we don't even know whether there will be a NEXT election. Maybe this is the mayor's final term and won't be running again. More broadly, we can't be sure that the mayor had anything to gain from supporting the political opponent.

Also, remember that Marion's argument boils down to this: the mayor was rewarding Azco's owner for political support -- political support that ALREADY occurred in the past. That's much different than doing a favor to get FUTURE political support.

Is it possible that the mayor had something to gain by supporting the political opponent? Sure, but that's fine -- we're not looking for the answer choice that PROVES that the mayor doesn't have any cruder motives. We're only looking for an answer choice that is the logically strongest counter Randy can make to Marion’s objection.

If choice (B) is true, then it is shows that the mayor also "rewards" political opponents -- people who have NOT supported the mayor in the past. So we can no longer confidently assert that the mayor ONLY rewards people who have given her political support (i.e. that the mayor has cruder motives).

(B) might not DISPROVE Marion's point, but it is a strong counter to Marion's logic. And it's certainly stronger than any of the other options, so (B) is our winner.

I hope that helps!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts