Quote:
Five years ago the number of thefts annually committed in Laytonville was roughly the same as in Stoneville. According to police reports, over the last five years the total number of thefts committed in Laytonville has increased by 20 percent while the total amount of thefts committed in Stoneville has increased by 10 percent.
Let's say 5 years ago,
Number of thefts annually committed in Stoneville = 100
Number of thefts in Laytonville = 100 approx.
In the last 5 years percent increase in thefts committed
Laytonville = 20%
Stoneville = 10%
So, we can say that the no. of thefts in Laytonville > Stoneville
Which of the following can be properly inferred from the passage above?A. Crime rate in Laytonville has increased over the last five years. -
We only know about the number of cases committed, can't say anything about the crime rate. There can be lower crime rate and higher cases. Depends on the proportion of people committing crime and total population B. Per capita number of thefts committed in Laytonville is now greater than in Stoneville.
Can't say. Maybe the population is greater in Laytonville than in Stoneville and so the per capita no. of thefts should be lowC. Stoneville is now more attractive for new residents than Laytonville.
IrrelevantD. There are more thieves in Laytonville than in Stoneville.
Can't say. We only know about the number of casesE. As of this year the total number of thefts committed in Laytonville is greater than that in Stoneville.
Correct. As per our prethinking