Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
06 Jan 2004, 12:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
58% (01:51) correct
42%
(01:46)
wrong
based on 1051
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Murray: You claim Senator Brandon has accepted gifts from lobbyists. You are wrong to make this criticism. That it is motivated by personal dislike is shown by the fact that you deliberately avoid criticizing other politicians who have done what you accuse Senator Brandon of doing.
Jan: You are right that I dislike Senator Brandon, but just because I have not criticized the same failing in others doesn't' mean you can excuse the senator's offense.
If Murray and Jane are both sincere in what they say, then it can properly be concluded that they agree that
(A) Senator Brandon has accepted gifts from lobbyists
(B) It is wrong for politicians to accept gifts from lobbyists
(C) Jane's criticism of Senator Brandon is motivated only by personal dislike
(D) Senator Brandon should be criticized for accepting gifts from lobbyists
(E) One or more politicians have accepted gifts from lobbyists
Jan: You are right that I dislike Senator Brandon, but just because I have not criticized the same failing in others doesn't' mean you can excuse the senator's offense.
If Murray and Jane are both sincere in what they say, then it can properly be concluded that they agree that
(A) Senator Brandon has accepted gifts from lobbyists
(B) It is wrong for politicians to accept gifts from lobbyists
(C) Jane's criticism of Senator Brandon is motivated only by personal dislike
(D) Senator Brandon should be criticized for accepting gifts from lobbyists
(E) One or more politicians have accepted gifts from lobbyists
06 Jan 2004, 14:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
Geethu
Murray only objects to Jan's criticisim, but that does not mean the Murray also accepts that Senator Brandon has accepted gifts from lobbyists.
The argument given in the premises holds even if Murray believes that Brandon has not taken gifts.
So, I think B is the best
27 Jul 2016, 09:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
ANSWER IS E
Murray: You claim Senator Brandon has accepted gifts from lobbyists. You are wrong to make this criticism. That it is motivated by personal dislike is shown by the fact that you deliberately avoid criticizing other politicians who have done what you accuse Senator Brandon of doing.
NOTICE HOW MURRAY DOES NOT ACTUALLY AGREES THAT SENATOR BRANDON HAS ACCEPTED GIFTS.
HE PARAPHRASES JAN BY SAYING "YOU CLAIM". AFTER THAT WHATEVER MURRAY IS SAYING IS A REPETITION OF JANE'S WORDS.
BUT THEN MURRAY ACCEPTS THAT OTHER POLITICIAN HAVE DEFINITELY TAKEN GIFTS. "the fact that you deliberately avoid criticizing other politicians who have done"
THEN MURRAY AGAIN REFUSE TO ACCEPT THAT SENATOR BRANDON HAS TAKEN GIFTS BECAUSE HE USES THE WORD "ACCUSES" WHICH MEANS FALSE ALLEGATION :-accuse Senator Brandon of doing.
Jane: You are right that I dislike Senator Brandon, but just because I have not criticized the same failing in others doesn't' mean you can excuse the senator's offense.
NOTICE HOW JAN ACCEPTS THAT HE HATES SENATOR BRANDON AND HOW JAN CLAIMS THAT POLITICIANS HAVE TAKEN GIFT. (That includes Senator Brandon and Others)
If Murray and Jane are both sincere in what they say, then it can properly be concluded that they agree that
(A) Senator Brandon has accepted gifts from lobbyists
INCORRECT : Murray never agrees that Senator brandon has taken gift from lobbyist. He says "Jan claims that senator brandon has accepted gift". Murray's thought on the subject has been not even told to the reader. He then accepts that other politician have taken gift but then again refuses to believe that senator brandon has taken gift, because he uses the word "accuse" which means attacking someone without evidence.
(B) It is wrong for politicians to accept gifts from lobbyists
WRONG:- No policy guidelines are mentioned about what is wrong or right.
(C) Jane's criticism of Senator Brandon is motivated only by personal dislike
WRONG:- ALMOST CORRECT. The use of "ONLY" makes it a extreme option. We do not know that the reason is only personal dislike. It can be one of the many reasons why Jane hate Senator Bradon
(D) Senator Brandon should be criticized for accepting gifts from lobbyists
WRONG:- Firstly:- Murray says specifically :- "Senator brandon should not be critisized ". Secondly :-No rhyme or reason is given why Senator should be critisized. No where the argument states that politician who accept gift from lobbies should be critized. For all we know accepting gift if allowed under the law currently and that Jane and Murray are having an imaginary conversation in their office about what will happen in the future if accepting gift become a bad thing.
(E) One or more politicians have accepted gifts from lobbyists
CORRECT:-
Murray says :- Mr. Jane you deliberately avoid criticizing other politicians who have done what you accuse Senator Brandon of doing. Meaning Murray is sure that other politicians have accepted gift.
Jane says:- ... It doesn't' mean you can excuse the senator's offence. Meaning Jane's is sure that Senator Brandon has accepted gift.
SO WHOMSOEVER YOU BELIEVE ATLEAST ONE OR MORE (that is logically equivalent to some) POLITICIAN HAVE TAKEN GIFTS FROM LOBBYIST.
Murray: You claim Senator Brandon has accepted gifts from lobbyists. You are wrong to make this criticism. That it is motivated by personal dislike is shown by the fact that you deliberately avoid criticizing other politicians who have done what you accuse Senator Brandon of doing.
NOTICE HOW MURRAY DOES NOT ACTUALLY AGREES THAT SENATOR BRANDON HAS ACCEPTED GIFTS.
HE PARAPHRASES JAN BY SAYING "YOU CLAIM". AFTER THAT WHATEVER MURRAY IS SAYING IS A REPETITION OF JANE'S WORDS.
BUT THEN MURRAY ACCEPTS THAT OTHER POLITICIAN HAVE DEFINITELY TAKEN GIFTS. "the fact that you deliberately avoid criticizing other politicians who have done"
THEN MURRAY AGAIN REFUSE TO ACCEPT THAT SENATOR BRANDON HAS TAKEN GIFTS BECAUSE HE USES THE WORD "ACCUSES" WHICH MEANS FALSE ALLEGATION :-accuse Senator Brandon of doing.
Jane: You are right that I dislike Senator Brandon, but just because I have not criticized the same failing in others doesn't' mean you can excuse the senator's offense.
NOTICE HOW JAN ACCEPTS THAT HE HATES SENATOR BRANDON AND HOW JAN CLAIMS THAT POLITICIANS HAVE TAKEN GIFT. (That includes Senator Brandon and Others)
If Murray and Jane are both sincere in what they say, then it can properly be concluded that they agree that
(A) Senator Brandon has accepted gifts from lobbyists
INCORRECT : Murray never agrees that Senator brandon has taken gift from lobbyist. He says "Jan claims that senator brandon has accepted gift". Murray's thought on the subject has been not even told to the reader. He then accepts that other politician have taken gift but then again refuses to believe that senator brandon has taken gift, because he uses the word "accuse" which means attacking someone without evidence.
(B) It is wrong for politicians to accept gifts from lobbyists
WRONG:- No policy guidelines are mentioned about what is wrong or right.
(C) Jane's criticism of Senator Brandon is motivated only by personal dislike
WRONG:- ALMOST CORRECT. The use of "ONLY" makes it a extreme option. We do not know that the reason is only personal dislike. It can be one of the many reasons why Jane hate Senator Bradon
(D) Senator Brandon should be criticized for accepting gifts from lobbyists
WRONG:- Firstly:- Murray says specifically :- "Senator brandon should not be critisized ". Secondly :-No rhyme or reason is given why Senator should be critisized. No where the argument states that politician who accept gift from lobbies should be critized. For all we know accepting gift if allowed under the law currently and that Jane and Murray are having an imaginary conversation in their office about what will happen in the future if accepting gift become a bad thing.
(E) One or more politicians have accepted gifts from lobbyists
CORRECT:-
Murray says :- Mr. Jane you deliberately avoid criticizing other politicians who have done what you accuse Senator Brandon of doing. Meaning Murray is sure that other politicians have accepted gift.
Jane says:- ... It doesn't' mean you can excuse the senator's offence. Meaning Jane's is sure that Senator Brandon has accepted gift.
SO WHOMSOEVER YOU BELIEVE ATLEAST ONE OR MORE (that is logically equivalent to some) POLITICIAN HAVE TAKEN GIFTS FROM LOBBYIST.
anandnk
