Bunuel
In Country E, car sales have dropped significantly in the past 8 years. During this time, public awareness about the ecology and the serious harm caused by fossil fuel-burning vehicles, amongst other things, has experienced a tremendous increase. This heightened level of public awareness, therefore, is the reason for the drop in car sales.
Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?
A. Whether there is
any opposing evidence showing that vehicles that run on fossil fuels do not influence the ecology to a great extent
B. Whether car sales have
decreased in countries with similar population densities to Country EC.
Whether the retail prices of cars, or of fuel, have increased during the past 8 yearsD. Whether the public
awareness campaigns held in Country E touched on the subject of recyclingE. Whether the fossil fuel-burning vehicles in Country E are
manufactured locally or imported.
E : Sales (8 Yr) ↓ Env Awareness ↑-----Leads to--------> Sales ↓
(A) Ot of scope, If yes, there are opposing evidences showing that vehicles that run on fossil fuels influence the ecology then " Env Awareness ↑-----Leads to--------> Sales ↓" is falsified.
If No, there are no opposing evidences showing that vehicles that run on fossil fuels influence the ecology then " Env Awareness ↑-----Leads to--------> Sales ↓" this is the cause but no additional evidence is provided to establish the validity of the argument.
(B) similar population densities to Country E - Irrelevant.
(C) If prices have increased (Cars/Fuel) people will prefer not to buy Card (Good)
(D) Recycling is not concern, how can u recycle environental damage from fossil fuel burning and declining car sales.
(E) manufactured locally or imported - Irrelevant
Correct Answer must hence be (C)