Last visit was: 05 Sep 2026, 20:08 It is currently 05 Sep 2026, 20:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,155
Own Kudos:
839,393
 [4]
Given Kudos: 111,332
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,155
Kudos: 839,393
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,155
Own Kudos:
839,393
 [2]
Given Kudos: 111,332
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,155
Kudos: 839,393
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
vrinda6
Joined: 20 Jul 2020
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
30
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
DachauerDon
Joined: 19 Apr 2025
Last visit: 16 Aug 2026
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
71
 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: Germany
Schools: LBS
Products:
Schools: LBS
Posts: 88
Kudos: 71
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer: D)

Paradox: the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at the airport increased despite a campaign to raise awareness.

A) Not only are the majority of people still able to comprehend the warnings, but this would still not explain the sharp increase in thefts -> INCORRECT
B) Irrelevant -> INCORRECT
C) This would deepen the paradox -> INCORRECT
D) If it's well known that pickpocketing occurs in public areas, then the campaign would've had little effect -> CORRECT
E) This would deepen the paradox -> INCORRECT
User avatar
Sanny7
Joined: 10 Apr 2026
Last visit: 19 Aug 2026
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
45
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Products:
Posts: 52
Kudos: 45
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need to explain this paradox

the conclusion states - even with Bright colored notices, theft increased significantly

we need to explain how the Theft increased significantly

A - talks about people not able to read, Ok, so the posters are negligible, even if it is 100%, it should be the same amount of theft before the notices were stuck and after the notices were stuck, it doesn't talk about why the increase in theft

B - simply OOS, we don't care

C - Ok, Police are on patrol, this should tighten the security, it brings another clause to the argument doesn't explain why the theft increased

D- my guess for correct ans, people tend to look at there pockets or wherever they hold something valuable, this happened when they see the notices and try to be cautious, so it allow thieves to pinpoint the exact location of where they are holding the valuables and if or not a person is holding valuables... so more theft, explains the paradox {movies experience popped up}

E - E looks good, but they are holding it or wearing it under their clothing, meaning it proves hard for thieves to steal the items
User avatar
RDM42
Joined: 20 Jan 2025
Last visit: 24 Aug 2026
Posts: 464
Own Kudos:
328
 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 464
Kudos: 328
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written. Doesn't explain the increase. NO
(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations. This is irrelevant. NO
(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted. This should have decreased the theft cases. NO
(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups. When people see notices about theft, they unconsciously touch or grope their valuables and hence thieves can more easily identify where the valueables are. So it becomes easy to steal. ANSWER

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing. It should have decreased thefts. NO

D
User avatar
Barsha5
Joined: 26 Jun 2022
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 58
Kudos: 53
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Warning notice about pick pockets were posted to create awareness among travellers. In the months coming, the pickpockets rates increased even further.

We have to find an option that resolves this paradox.

A) some travellers can’t read notices. But that implies some can. So there should have been some reduction, it shouldn’t have made things worse. Wrong

B) airport became luxury shopping hall. Doesn’t explain the paradox. May be more people came to shop but then more people should also have been aware of theft.

C) police patrolling should ideally reduce theft, not increase. Wrong

D) tendency of people to grope their valuables increases when they perceive danger. - people sense danger due to posters- increasing awareness - increasing anxiety- pickpockets identify where the valuables are easily. Correct

E) people brought hidden packs. Doesn’t explain. This should reduce the theft.
User avatar
heyaa
Joined: 19 Dec 2024
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
60
 [1]
Given Kudos: 46
Location: India
Posts: 71
Kudos: 60
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
imo D
A - even if they can't read, it doesn't explain increased theft
B - okay, but no new change, irrelevant
C & E - should've decreased then, not correct
D - makes sense, and can be an explanation, correct
User avatar
tannu.jha_0104
Joined: 07 Apr 2024
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
51
 [1]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT 1: 200 Q10 V10
GRE 1: Q135 V135
GMAT 1: 200 Q10 V10
GRE 1: Q135 V135
Posts: 46
Kudos: 51
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
action- big signs warn travelers about pickpocket
result-pick pocketing increases at an even rate faster

A-that means 60% can read them, if 60% of people are now warned, theft should atleast slow down or stay the same
B-out of scope timeline
C-if cops are walking around, thefts should go down not up
D-correct ans matches prethinking
E-contradicts the fact that theft increased
User avatar
ankushsambare
Joined: 13 Jun 2022
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 313
Own Kudos:
224
 [1]
Given Kudos: 230
Location: India
GPA: 2.4
Products:
Posts: 313
Kudos: 224
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise:
* Pickpocket thefts were increasing at airport
* Airport posted warning notices telling travelers to beware
* After notices were posted, thefts increased even faster

Que: What explain the the increase despite posters
A. 40% couldn't read -> only 40% won't increase faster
B. More luxury shopping -> don't explain faster increase
C. More police -> weakens
D. People checked valuables -> pickpockets easily identify target. Correct
E. Hidden belt packs -> Weakens
User avatar
okHedwig
Joined: 13 Apr 2022
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 106
Kudos: 66
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO B
Since in the seven years, it became the worlds premium luxury shopping destination, then even after notices, more ppl might come for shopping hence theft incraese
A= Incorrect. Still 60% could read and might become aware of theft
C=If patrolling incarese then theft should have been reduced, but arg says opposite
D=If ppl look for personal belonging more ofthen then pickpoteing should reduce, incorrect
E=If travellers purchase these belts, then their belongings might be safe under their clothes, hence looks incorrect
Bunuel
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets. In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
onlyPlanA
Joined: 26 Jul 2024
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 140
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 55
Posts: 140
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO, the answer is D.

As it was observed that after posting the notices, the thefts increased. The reason could be that, once people read the notice, they subconsciously check their pockets or purses to verify that their valuables are still with them. This psychological reaction to the notice confirms the suspicion of the thief, who might be keeping tabs on them. Hence, the answer is D.
User avatar
GoodKey
Joined: 29 May 2026
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
36
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Products:
Posts: 42
Kudos: 36
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A - It explains why the notice had no effect, but it does not explain why did the notice have the opposite predicted effects.

B- It explains a reason to why thefts might be happening at the airport, but it doesn't explain the sudden spike.

C- The police patrolling the airport should've resulted in increased safety. Doesn't answer the question.

D- By doing this action, the thieves will be able to pinpoint the location of the valuables easily thus making theft easier. CORRECT

E- This should've made theft harder and not easier. Doesn't answer the question.
User avatar
Vivek1707
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 353
Own Kudos:
186
 [1]
Given Kudos: 150
Products:
Posts: 353
Kudos: 186
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Loved this paradox question.

A. So what if 40% people cannot read the languages ?. Why would the pickpockting increase ? This doesn't explain. Eliminate.
B. Ok so its a prime luxury shopping destination. Does that mean there will be more theft ? NOPE
C. This would deepen the paradox. Eliminate
D. Yup. Think about it this way ---> When you see a pick pocketing warning, you immediately reach your back pocket and check whether your wallet is there or not. Now, if a thief is observing you, he/she'll notice and that you keep your wallet in your back pocket and hence it will become easier to pick it. This may explain why the pick pocketing rates have gone up.
E. Again the pick pocketing rates shouldnt go up if thats the case.

D for me


Bunuel
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets. In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,129
Own Kudos:
6,089
 [1]
Given Kudos: 164
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 6,129
Kudos: 6,089
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets.

In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.
Even if 40% of passengers are unable to read notices then also this is not the reason why pickpocketing should increase at the airport.
Incorrect

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.
While this may explain why passengers may carry expensive and valuable items at the airport but this has no relation with introduction of notices and fails to explain why pickpocketing cases should increases after putting notices.
Incorrect

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.
If local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of the airport, this should have ideally decreased the number of pickpocketing cases at the airport by alarming and preventing thieves from committing any crime.
Incorrect

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.
If this is true, and the passengers frequently look and check for valuable belongings after reading notices for staying alert, this may signal pickpockets of the location of valuables and may increase pickpocketing cases instead of reducing them. This explains the paradox in the argument.
Correct

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.
If this is true, many travellers purchased belt packs large enough to hold valuables and that are worn under the traveller's clothing, this should have made pickpocketing more difficult and reduced the number of pickpocketing cases instead of increasing them.
Incorrect

IMO D
User avatar
Junaidhh99
Joined: 14 Apr 2026
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 6
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option has to explain why the posters were not only ineffective but also increased theft numbers.

My answer: D

Option eliminating reasons:

A: gives reason only for ineffectiveness. No mention of increase

B: Gives a reason of why thefts might occur but nothing about the posters or increase in theft

C: The day after the posters were put up. - we're talking about the effects of months after the notices were put up

D: Gives indirect reasoning as to why the poster might have increased theft. Person looks at poster -> Reaches for their valuables -> Thief notices it -> Thief steals it.

E: Pickpockets would have a hard time stealing from under the clothing belts
User avatar
feistygirl
Joined: 26 Apr 2026
Last visit: 06 Aug 2026
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
54
 [1]
Posts: 60
Kudos: 54
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i am going with option d.
as warnings reveal location of valuables which explains the paradox.
a incorrect - states signs ignored by some which doesn't explain the increase.
b incorrect - states more wealthy shoppers indicating wrong timing.
c incorrect - states more police which does the opposite effect.
e incorrect - states better protection which also does the opposite effect.
User avatar
kingbucky
Joined: 28 Jul 2023
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 649
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 368
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 649
Kudos: 745
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The paradox here is that an action intended to reduce pickpocketing (posting warning signs) actually caused the rate of pickpocketing to accelerate. We need an answer choice that shows how the warning signs inadvertently helped the thieves.

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.
This is incorrect. While this explains why the signs might have been completely ineffective for many travelers, it does not explain why the rate of theft actually grew at a faster pace than before.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.
This is incorrect. This provides background on why Karlarinda is a lucrative target for pickpockets in general, but it does nothing to explain the sudden spike in thefts exactly matching the timeline of the new warning signs.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.
This is incorrect. Increased police presence should logically decrease the rate of theft, which makes the paradox even more confusing rather than resolving it.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.
This is correct. This beautifully resolves the paradox. If travelers see a large sign warning them about pickpockets (perceiving a threat), their natural instinct is to immediately pat their pockets or touch their bags to check that their valuables are still there. By doing this in public, the travelers are inadvertently signaling to observant pickpockets exactly where their wallets, phones, and passports are hidden, making the thieves' jobs significantly easier and driving up the theft rate.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.
This is incorrect. If travelers are securing their valuables under their clothes, the theft rate should drop drastically, which contradicts the prompt's premise.
User avatar
Nkathiyawadi
Joined: 08 Feb 2026
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Posts: 57
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Situation : After applying bright colored notices on airport frequency of pickpocketing thefts at airport grew at faster pace.


We need to identify a situation in which this scenario can happen. i.e. what could be a probable scenario in which it can happen.

A : 40% people fly from Karlarinda's main airport and unable to ready any of the notices. Does not make any effect on the conclusion.
B : Becoming premier luxury shopping destination do not affect the conclusion. It does not mention anything about how many people visit/increase in visitor. Hence, not relevant.
C : Local department started patroling at the Karlarinda's main airport. This could be the reason behind increase in the pickpocketing. Due to their increase in number of visits, the number of cases reported will increase or the act can get identified which could not have identified if police did not start the patrolling. Correct answer.
D: Irrelevant. Physically check or grope for valuable things in various culture is not relevant to the conclusion or situation mentioned here.
E : against the conclusion. if more people bought belts which are worn under the traveller's clothing, no. of cases of pickpocking should reduce rather than increase.




Bunuel
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets. In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
Shlok02
Joined: 08 Jan 2024
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
41
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 41
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
In response to an alarming increase in the frequency of thefts by pickpockets at Karlarinda’s main airport over the preceding year, Karlarinda’s airport commission posted several large brightly-colored notices in the airport’s most prominent public areas, informing travelers of the recent spate of thefts and warning them to beware of pickpockets. In the months after these notices were posted, the frequency of pickpocketing thefts at Karlarinda’s main airport grew at an even faster rate than before the notices were posted.

Which of the following, if true, best explains the observed statistical effect of the notices posted by Karlarinda’s airport commission?

(A) Approximately 40 percent of passengers who fly into or out of Karlarinda’s main airport are unable to read any of the languages in which the notices are written.

(B) In the seven years since it abolished all sales taxes on purchases made by non-residents, Karlarinda has become one of the world’s premier luxury shopping destinations.

(C) The local police department began regular patrols of the public areas of Karlarinda’s main airport on the day when the warning notices were posted.

(D) The tendency of people to physically look or grope for the presence of valuable belongings when they perceive a threat of robbery is widespread across all cultures and demographic groups.

(E) Upon seeing the notices, many travelers purchased belt packs from the airport’s kiosks that are large enough to hold most valuables and that are worn under the traveler’s clothing.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
A - This would imply that pickpockets will not decrease from people reading the warning signs. However it also does not indicate why there would be a greater increase in pickpockets. EXCLUDE

B-
No relation to the increase in pickpockets in the airport region. EXCLUDE

C-
This should have ideally led to a decrease in pickpockets due to increase of police presence. EXCLUDE

D -
By doing this the people may unintentionally alert the pickpockets of the location of their belongings, thereby making it easier for pickpockets to steal their belongings, contributing to an increase of pickpockets. KEEP

E -
This should have again made pickpocketing more difficult by concealing the belongings under the individual's clothing. EXCLUDE

Answer - D
 1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts