Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 04:42 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 04:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,657
Own Kudos:
20,894
 [44]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,657
Kudos: 20,894
 [44]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
32
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,657
Own Kudos:
20,894
 [7]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,657
Kudos: 20,894
 [7]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
tapas.shyam
Joined: 08 Feb 2015
Last visit: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
3
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 2
Kudos: 3
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
shriramvelamuri
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Last visit: 29 Jun 2016
Posts: 159
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 113
Posts: 159
Kudos: 140
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow.. really a thriller question. Took me somewhere around 3 mins.

Solution

The only central idea is to know if either M or N or Both are even numbers.

From Option, B it is quite clear that N= even. [Exactly at that point, I stopped further calculation].


EgmatQuantExpert
Is the product of integers M and N even?

(1) N can be expressed as a difference of squares of two consecutive prime numbers at least one of which is odd. M can be expressed as a product of two natural numbers P and Q, where 2P + 1= Q.

(2) N can be expressed as a difference of squares of two consecutive prime numbers which lie at a distance of 2 units. M is the sum of all the numbers from 1 to Z where (Z+1) is a multiple of 4.

We will provide the OA in some time. Till then Happy Solving :lol:

This is

Ques 7 of The E-GMAT Number Properties Knockout



Register for our Free Session on Number Properties this Saturday to solve exciting 700+ Level Questions in a classroom environment under the real-time guidance of our Experts! :)
User avatar
Naina1
Joined: 05 Feb 2015
Last visit: 05 Jun 2016
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
86
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
WE:Information Technology (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 39
Kudos: 86
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi tapas.shyam

By 2 consecutive prime numbers it need not neccesarily mean that it would be 2 and 3.According to me, it means that out of primes numbers like 2,3,5,7... the numbers would be consecutive.
Also, in condition 2, M would also be even.
Consider multiples of 4- 4,8,12
So, Z would be 3,7,11
You can check the sum of these numbers using n(n+1)/2. It will be even always.
avatar
tapas.shyam
Joined: 08 Feb 2015
Last visit: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 2
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Naina1
Hi tapas.shyam

By 2 consecutive prime numbers it need not neccesarily mean that it would be 2 and 3.According to me, it means that out of primes numbers like 2,3,5,7... the numbers would be consecutive.
Also, in condition 2, M would also be even.
Consider multiples of 4- 4,8,12
So, Z would be 3,7,11
You can check the sum of these numbers using n(n+1)/2. It will be even always.

Hi Naina

Thanks for your reply and opinion. However, I think my reasoning is correct as the problem says - 2 consecutive prime numbers atleast one of which is odd. Now, except 2 & 3 there is no other case where we can have an even prime number - so emphasising 'atleast one is odd' in the problem then would seem redundant. In every other case of consecutive prime numbers, we shall always have two odd prime numbers no matter what.

Secondly, in second condition, we don't even need to look into M as once we have ascertained that N is even, we can conclude that M*N shall be even no matter what value of M.
avatar
sayansarkar
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Last visit: 15 Sep 2020
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.62
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Posts: 43
Kudos: 107
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
answer is B. Second one says the two prime numbers is at a distance of two hence "2" is ruled out since the next prime 3 is one away from it and 5 is 3 away from 2. Then the difference between squares of two off terms is even. N is even the value of M doesnt matter.
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EgmatQuantExpert
Detailed Solution

Step-I: Given Info

We are given two integers M and N and are asked to find if their product is even.

Step-II: Interpreting the Question Statement

The product of two numbers would be even if at least one of them is even. So, we need to find if either of M and N is even.

Step-III: Statement-I

The statement tells us that M is expressed as a difference of two consecutive prime numbers of which at least one is odd. Two cases are possible:

• We know that there is only one even prime number i.e. 2, so, if one of the prime numbers is 2, the other would be 3, which is odd. Squaring them would not change their even/odd nature. The difference of an even and an odd number would be odd, so N would be odd

• If both the prime numbers are odd, then the difference of their squares would be even (as odd-odd= even). So, N would be even.

From the above two cases, we can’t say with certainty whether N is odd or even.

The statement also tells us that M is a product of P & Q where Q= 2P + 1. We can infer from this that Q is an odd number, but we do not have any information about the even/odd nature of P. So, if P is odd, M would be odd and if P is even, M would be even. Hence, we can’t say with certainty whether M is odd or even.

Since, we don’t know with certainty that either of M, N is even or not, Statement-I is insufficient to answer the question.

Step-IV: Statement-II

Statement-II tells us that N can be expressed as difference of squares of two consecutive prime numbers which lie at a distance of 2 units. We know that all the prime numbers except 2 are odd, since the next prime number after 2 is 3, we can say that 2, 3 are not the consecutive prime numbers (as they lie at a distance of 1 unit). Thus we can conclude that N can be expressed as difference of two odd prime numbers. The difference of two odd numbers will be even.

So, N would be even.

Note here that we don’t need to find the even/odd nature of M because irrespective of the nature of M, the product of M & N would always be even as N is even.

Hence, Statement-II is sufficient to answer the question.

Step-V: Combining Statements I & II

Since, we have a unique answer from Statement- I we don’t need to be combine Statements- I & II.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B

Key Takeaways

1. Know the properties of Even-Odd combinations to save the time spent deriving them in the test.
2. There is only 1 even prime number i.e. 2.
3. Odd/Even number raised to any power would not change its even/odd nature


tapas.shyam- when we say that at least one is odd, it means that either both are odd primes or one is odd prime and one is even prime. From the analysis of St-I we can't say with certainty that N is odd/even
Naina1- In statement-II we do not need to calculate the even/odd nature of M once we have established that N is even, as their product would always be even.


Regards
Harsh

Harsh, thanks for the detailed solution. I have a doubt in statement #1 (I am definitely missing something here!). If Q= 2P+1, with both Q and being NATURAL NUMBERS, we can clearly see that Q is Odd. This leads to show that P will then be an even number. Thus, with one of P/Q determined to be an even number >> M=even. So MN = even irrespective of what N is. Thus the OA in my opinion should be D (both are sufficient!).
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,657
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,657
Kudos: 20,894
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Engr2012
EgmatQuantExpert
Detailed Solution

Step-I: Given Info

We are given two integers M and N and are asked to find if their product is even.

Step-II: Interpreting the Question Statement

The product of two numbers would be even if at least one of them is even. So, we need to find if either of M and N is even.

Step-III: Statement-I

The statement tells us that N is expressed as a difference of two consecutive prime numbers of which at least one is odd. Two cases are possible:

• We know that there is only one even prime number i.e. 2, so, if one of the prime numbers is 2, the other would be 3, which is odd. Squaring them would not change their even/odd nature. The difference of an even and an odd number would be odd, so N would be odd

• If both the prime numbers are odd, then the difference of their squares would be even (as odd-odd= even). So, N would be even.

From the above two cases, we can’t say with certainty whether N is odd or even.

The statement also tells us that M is a product of P & Q where Q= 2P + 1. We can infer from this that Q is an odd number, but we do not have any information about the even/odd nature of P. So, if P is odd, M would be odd and if P is even, M would be even. Hence, we can’t say with certainty whether M is odd or even.

Since, we don’t know with certainty that either of M, N is even or not, Statement-I is insufficient to answer the question.

Step-IV: Statement-II

Statement-II tells us that N can be expressed as difference of squares of two consecutive prime numbers which lie at a distance of 2 units. We know that all the prime numbers except 2 are odd, since the next prime number after 2 is 3, we can say that 2, 3 are not the consecutive prime numbers (as they lie at a distance of 1 unit). Thus we can conclude that N can be expressed as difference of two odd prime numbers. The difference of two odd numbers will be even.

So, N would be even.

Note here that we don’t need to find the even/odd nature of M because irrespective of the nature of M, the product of M & N would always be even as N is even.

Hence, Statement-II is sufficient to answer the question.

Step-V: Combining Statements I & II

Since, we have a unique answer from Statement- I we don’t need to be combine Statements- I & II.
Hence, the correct answer is Option B

Key Takeaways

1. Know the properties of Even-Odd combinations to save the time spent deriving them in the test.
2. There is only 1 even prime number i.e. 2.
3. Odd/Even number raised to any power would not change its even/odd nature


tapas.shyam- when we say that at least one is odd, it means that either both are odd primes or one is odd prime and one is even prime. From the analysis of St-I we can't say with certainty that N is odd/even
Naina1- In statement-II we do not need to calculate the even/odd nature of M once we have established that N is even, as their product would always be even.


Regards
Harsh

Harsh, thanks for the detailed solution. I have a doubt in statement #1 (I am definitely missing something here!). If Q= 2P+1, with both Q and being NATURAL NUMBERS, we can clearly see that Q is Odd. This leads to show that P will then be an even number. Thus, with one of P/Q determined to be an even number >> M=even. So MN = even irrespective of what N is. Thus the OA in my opinion should be D (both are sufficient!).

Hi Engr2012, You are absolutely right when you say Q is an odd number as it is in the form of 2P + 1, but if you observe you would see that Q will be an odd number irrespective of the even/odd nature of P as 2P would always be even irrespective of whether P is odd or even.

For example: Consider P = 10, Q= 21, also if P= 11, Q =23. So in both the cases, Q would be odd even when P is even or odd.

Since, we don't know for sure the even/odd nature of P in statement-I , we would not be able to comment on even/odd nature of N.

Hope its's clear :)

Regards
Harsh
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for the reply. I understand your point but let me present to you another way of looking at the given information. If Q=2P+1, we know for sure that Q will be ODD. Also we can write P= (Q-1)/2 and as Q is odd, P has to be even.

Let me know where I'm going wrong with my thinking!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,657
Own Kudos:
20,894
 [1]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,657
Kudos: 20,894
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Engr2012 Assume Q as 7, so Q-1= 6 which is even. If I divide (Q-1) by 2 I would get 3, which is odd.
Similarly, assume Q=9, so Q-1 = 8. If I divide (Q-1) by 2 I would get 4, which is even. Hence, Q can be even or odd.

An even number can be represented in the form of 2n. When this number is divided by 2, the resultant would be n. Now, n can be even or odd. So, we can say that a number when divided by 2 would still be even, if the original number was a multiple of at least \(2^2\) i.e. 4. In this case, we know that (Q-1) is even but do not know if (Q-1) is a multiple of 4. Hence, \(\frac{(Q-1)}{2}\) may be even or odd.

Regards
Harsh


User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Harsh

Thanks for the reply. Yes, now I understand my mistake. I was ignoring that 6 is an odd multiple of 2, in effect making P both odd and even with different sets of values for Q. Should've been more careful with my assumption.

Thanks
avatar
robu
Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Last visit: 16 Mar 2017
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 391
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V27
GPA: 1.9
WE:Engineering (Energy)
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V27
Posts: 69
Kudos: 181
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tapas.shyam
1) For N, we can surely say that it is odd. Since 2 & 3 are the only consecutive prime numbers, N = \(3^2 - 2^2\) = 5 which is odd.
Form M, we know that M = P*Q where Q is odd. But we don't know anything about P. So nature of M can't be found.
So, insufficient.

2) For N, we can surely say that it is even because difference of squares of any two prime numbers which differ by 2 shall always be even.This is because N = \((X+2)^2-X^2 = X^2 + 4 + 2X - X^2\) = 2X + 4 which is even for any number X.
Since N is always even here so product of M & N will be even no matter what M is.
Sufficient.

So B.




I think consecutive prime number can be 3,5,7,11,13,. Am i Correct. Please clarify.
avatar
SamriddhiPan
Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Last visit: 24 Feb 2019
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 55
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
Schools: Kellogg '20
Schools: Kellogg '20
Posts: 6
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EgmatQuantExpert
Is the product of integers M and N even?

(1) N can be expressed as a difference of squares of two consecutive prime numbers at least one of which is odd. M can be expressed as a product of two natural numbers P and Q, where 2P + 1= Q.

(2) N can be expressed as a difference of squares of two consecutive prime numbers which lie at a distance of 2 units. M is the sum of all the numbers from 1 to Z where (Z+1) is a multiple of 4.

This is

Ques 7 of The E-GMAT Number Properties Knockout



Register for our Free Session on Number Properties (held every 3rd week) to solve exciting 700+ Level Questions in a classroom environment under the real-time guidance of our Experts :)



Hello,
Thanks for your response but I have a question.
In the first statement, "N can be expressed as a difference of squares of two consecutive prime numbers", only consecutive prime nos are 2 and 3. So doesn't become the case in hand?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,928
Own Kudos:
811,525
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,914
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,928
Kudos: 811,525
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SamriddhiPan
EgmatQuantExpert
Is the product of integers M and N even?

(1) N can be expressed as a difference of squares of two consecutive prime numbers at least one of which is odd. M can be expressed as a product of two natural numbers P and Q, where 2P + 1= Q.

(2) N can be expressed as a difference of squares of two consecutive prime numbers which lie at a distance of 2 units. M is the sum of all the numbers from 1 to Z where (Z+1) is a multiple of 4.

This is

Ques 7 of The E-GMAT Number Properties Knockout



Register for our Free Session on Number Properties (held every 3rd week) to solve exciting 700+ Level Questions in a classroom environment under the real-time guidance of our Experts :)



Hello,
Thanks for your response but I have a question.
In the first statement, "N can be expressed as a difference of squares of two consecutive prime numbers", only consecutive prime nos are 2 and 3. So doesn't become the case in hand?

The two consecutive integers, of which both are primes are indeed 2 and 3. But consecutive primes are {2, 3}, {3, 5}, {5, 7}, {7, 11}...
User avatar
D4kshGargas
Joined: 01 Apr 2020
Last visit: 28 Feb 2021
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 282
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q46 V34 (Online)
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V35 (Online)
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V35 (Online)
Posts: 81
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Naina1
Hi tapas.shyam

By 2 consecutive prime numbers it need not neccesarily mean that it would be 2 and 3.According to me, it means that out of primes numbers like 2,3,5,7... the numbers would be consecutive.
Also, in condition 2, M would also be even.
Consider multiples of 4- 4,8,12
So, Z would be 3,7,11
You can check the sum of these numbers using n(n+1)/2. It will be even always.

I think your solution can be reframed more elegantly and clearly as follows:

Given: M is the sum of all the numbers from 1 to Z where (Z+1) is a multiple of 4.
\( M = \frac{Z (Z + 1) }{ 2}\)

Since \(\frac{(Z + 1) }{ 2}\) = Even Integer (Given that (Z + 1) is a multiple of 4)
We can conclude that M is even.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,990
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,990
Kudos: 1,118
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109928 posts
498 posts
212 posts