Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 13:18 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 13:18
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 (Medium)|   Inequalities|               
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,754
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,754
Kudos: 810,658
 [68]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
67
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
44,993
 [29]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 44,993
 [29]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,443
 [10]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,443
 [10]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
DavidTutorexamPAL
User avatar
examPAL Representative
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Last visit: 09 Sep 2020
Posts: 1,002
Own Kudos:
2,042
 [3]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 1,002
Kudos: 2,042
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While our research found that in most DS questions the fastest way to solve the question is the Logical approach, in questions like this one, in which both the given information and the statements can be further simplified, the Precise approach might be faster.
The questions, translated into an algebraic expression, is whether (x+y+z)/3 > z, or, is x +y+z>3z, which can be simplified to: x+y>2z?
By 'moving' the negative variables in statement (1) to the other side of the inequality we get 2z < x+y, which is exactly what we were looking for.
Statement (2) on the other hand tells is that one variable is larger than z while the other is smaller, but we don't know how large are the differences (if y was far greater than z, their sum could have been greater than 2z. Also, if both x and y were greater than z, then their sum would have definitely been greater than 2z).
So statement (2) is not sufficient, while statement (1) is.
The correct answer is (A).

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
ZoltanBP
Joined: 14 Apr 2017
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
1,007
 [3]
Given Kudos: 567
Location: Hungary
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Posts: 79
Kudos: 1,007
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is the average (arithmetic mean) of the numbers x, y, and z greater than z ?

(1) z − x < y − z
(2) x < z < y


DS69502.01
OG2020 NEW QUESTION

The original question: Is \(\frac{x+y+z}{3}>z\) ?
The rephrased question: Is \(x+y+z>3z\) ? \(\implies\) Is \(x+y>2z\) ? \(\implies\) Is \(z<\frac{x+y}{2}\) ?

In words: Is \(z\) less than the average of the numbers \(x\) and \(y\) ?

1) We know that \(z-x<y-z\), which we can rearrange.

\(2z<x+y\)

\(z<\frac{x+y}{2}\)

Thus, the answer to the rephrased question is a definite Yes. \(\implies\) Sufficient

2) We know that \(x<z<y\) and can test possible cases. If \(x=1\), \(z=1.5\), and \(y=2\), then the answer to the rephrased question is No. However, if \(x=1\), \(z=1.4\), and \(y=2\), then the answer to the rephrased question is Yes. Thus, we can't get a definite answer to the rephrased question. \(\implies\) Insufficient

Answer: A
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 22,278
Own Kudos:
26,528
 [5]
Given Kudos: 302
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 22,278
Kudos: 26,528
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is the average (arithmetic mean) of the numbers x, y, and z greater than z ?

(1) z − x < y − z
(2) x < z < y


DS69502.01
OG2020 NEW QUESTION

We need to determine:

Is (x + y + z)/3 > z ?

Is x + y + z > 3z ?

Is x + y > 2z ?

Statement One Alone:

z − x < y − z

Manipulating the inequality, we have:

2z < y + x

We see that the question has been answered. Statement one alone is sufficient to answer the question.

Statement Two Alone:

x < z < y

Statement two is not sufficient. If x = 1, z = 2, y = 3, then the average of x, y, and z is not greater than z. However if x = 1, z = 2, and y = 100, then the average is x, y, and z is greater than z.

Answer: A
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,045
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,045
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

We're asked if the average (arithmetic mean) of the numbers X, Y, and Z is GREATER than Z. This is a YES/NO question and can be approached with a mix of Arithmetic and TESTing VALUES. To start, we can 'rewrite' the question a bit:

Is (X+Y+Z)/3 > Z?
Is (X+Y+Z) > 3Z?
Is (X+Y) > 2Z?

By comparison, this is an easier question to answer than what we were initially given.

(1) Z - X < Y - Z

With Fact 1, we can rewrite the inequality as:
2Z < X + Y
This Fact tells us that (X+Y) IS greater than 2Z, so the answer to the question is clearly YES.
Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT

(2) X < Z < Y

With this inequality, we can TEST VALUES and track the results.
IF....
X=1, Z=2, Y=3, then (1+3) is NOT greater than (2)(2), so the answer to the question is NO.
X=1, Z=2, Y=4, then (1+4) IS greater than (2)(2), so the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Final Answer:

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
uchihaitachi
Joined: 20 Aug 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
241
 [2]
Given Kudos: 174
Posts: 89
Kudos: 241
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question asks us is
\(\frac{x+y+z}{3}\) > z
Rephrasing it, we get is x+y > 2z

Statement 1 -
we get 2z < x + y
Sufficient

Statement 2 -
The average lies between the min and max number.
So, we know that avg lies between x and y.
Now, it can be either greater than, less than or equal to z.
Insufficient.

Answer - A
avatar
kri93
Joined: 02 Dec 2016
Last visit: 03 Mar 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 250
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How can we multiply x+y+z/3>z......x+y+z>3z without knowing the signs?
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,045
 [2]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,045
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kri93
How can we multiply x+y+z/3>z......x+y+z>3z without knowing the signs?

Hi kri93,

The issue that you're referring to is only relevant when you're multiplying or dividing an inequality by a NEGATIVE number. Here, we're multiplying both sides by POSITIVE 3, so we don't have worry about the 'direction' of the inequality.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
avatar
Rocknrolla21
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 13 Aug 2021
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 227
Schools: NUS '23
Schools: NUS '23
Posts: 40
Kudos: 7
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello, experts!

Why hasn't anyone considered negative integers as an option for Statement 2?

I considered x=-6, z=-4, and y=-2. In this case, 2z = -8 is not greater than -4.

X+Y+Z/3 = (-6)+(-2)+(-4)/3

-12/3 = -4

Thanks!
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,045
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,045
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Rocknrolla21,

TESTing VALUES is a great way to approach this question - and you can absolutely use negative integers when working through this prompt. In certain DS prompts, that type of 'thoroughness' in your thinking (meaning that you're considering more than just positive integers) is essential to proving what the correct answer is. With this prompt, it's not necessary though - and some minor tweaks to the positive numbers that you might TEST is all that's needed to prove that Fact 2 is Insufficient.

With a bit of work, we can rewrite the given question as:

Is (X+Y) > 2Z?

(2) X < Z < Y

With this inequality, we can TEST VALUES and track the results. The first example is arguably one of the easiest that we could use:
IF....
X=1, Z=2, Y=3, then (1+3) is NOT greater than (2)(2), so the answer to the question is NO.

Since we now have a "NO" answer, if there is a way to get a "YES" answer, then we'd be done working here. Simply changing the value of Y is all that's needed:
IF....
X=1, Z=2, Y=4, then (1+4) IS greater than (2)(2), so the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,285
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,285
Kudos: 1,906
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,976
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,976
Kudos: 16,899
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is the average (arithmetic mean) of the numbers x, y, and z greater than z ?

(1) z − x < y − z
(2) x < z < y

Answer: Option A

Video solution by GMATinsight

User avatar
Suruchim12
Joined: 27 Oct 2021
Last visit: 29 Oct 2025
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Location: India
Posts: 28
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts, EMPOWERgmatRichC

Can someone help me understand, if I were to take the logical approach and not simplify the question to x+y >2z

Then for St. (2) : if we are told that y is the largest no. and x is the smallest, invariably putting z as the middle doesn't z then become the mean for a 3 number sequence. And therefore, the mean is not greater than z and sufficient to answer the question.

I understand that's not OA but if someone can explain the flaw in the above deduction pls! TIA
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
44,993
 [1]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 44,993
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Suruchim12
Hi Experts, EMPOWERgmatRichC

Can someone help me understand, if I were to take the logical approach and not simplify the question to x+y >2z

Then for St. (2) : if we are told that y is the largest no. and x is the smallest, invariably putting z as the middle doesn't z then become the mean for a 3 number sequence. And therefore, the mean is not greater than z and sufficient to answer the question.

I understand that's not OA but if someone can explain the flaw in the above deduction pls! TIA


z in middle means ‘z’ is the median, but you cannot say anything about mean.
1) 1<2<3….Here z is equal to the mean, 2.
2) 1<3<4….Here, mean is 8/3 or 2.67, and z>2.67
3) 1<2<6… Here, mean is 9/3 or 3, and z<3
User avatar
Suruchim12
Joined: 27 Oct 2021
Last visit: 29 Oct 2025
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Location: India
Posts: 28
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Suruchim12
Hi Experts, EMPOWERgmatRichC

Can someone help me understand, if I were to take the logical approach and not simplify the question to x+y >2z

Then for St. (2) : if we are told that y is the largest no. and x is the smallest, invariably putting z as the middle doesn't z then become the mean for a 3 number sequence. And therefore, the mean is not greater than z and sufficient to answer the question.

I understand that's not OA but if someone can explain the flaw in the above deduction pls! TIA


z in middle means ‘z’ is the median, but you cannot say anything about mean.
1) 1<2<3….Here z is equal to the mean, 2.
2) 1<3<4….Here, mean is 8/3 or 2.67, and z>2.67
3) 1<2<6… Here, mean is 9/3 or 3, and z<3



I get where I went wrong. The mean and median is equal ONLY in evenly spaced sets and since we do not have that info we can't assume it and therefore the mean can be different.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,045
 [2]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,045
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Suruchim12
chetan2u
Suruchim12
Hi Experts, EMPOWERgmatRichC

Can someone help me understand, if I were to take the logical approach and not simplify the question to x+y >2z

Then for St. (2) : if we are told that y is the largest no. and x is the smallest, invariably putting z as the middle doesn't z then become the mean for a 3 number sequence. And therefore, the mean is not greater than z and sufficient to answer the question.

I understand that's not OA but if someone can explain the flaw in the above deduction pls! TIA


z in middle means ‘z’ is the median, but you cannot say anything about mean.
1) 1<2<3….Here z is equal to the mean, 2.
2) 1<3<4….Here, mean is 8/3 or 2.67, and z>2.67
3) 1<2<6… Here, mean is 9/3 or 3, and z<3



I get where I went wrong. The mean and median is equal ONLY in evenly spaced sets and since we do not have that info we can't assume it and therefore the mean can be different.

Hi Suruchim12,

Since chetan2u has already answered your question (with some examples), I won't rehash any of that work here. In the broader sense though, you have to be careful about the 'assumptions' that you put on to any DS question that you work through. In most of these prompts, there will be an 'obvious' answer - and you stated one in your explanation (re: Z is in the 'middle' of X and Y). However, that is NOT what X < Z < Y actually means (this means that the value of Z falls somewhere between and X and Y; maybe it's the exact 'middle', but it might not be). DS questions are designed to test a variety of different skills (far more than just 'math' skills), including the thoroughness of your thinking. Going forward, if you find yourself thinking that the given information in Fact 1 or Fact 2 leads to just one solution, take a moment to try anything else that you can think of that 'fits' what you're told. It won't take very long to do that work and those few extra seconds might help you to avoid missing out on some easy points.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Contact Rich at: [email protected]
avatar
Deepam10
Joined: 29 Nov 2023
Last visit: 02 Mar 2024
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 62
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Posts: 5
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is the average (arithmetic mean) of the numbers x, y, and z greater than z ?

(1) z − x < y − z
(2) x < z < y


DS69502.01
OG2020 NEW QUESTION

On St2, can we do as below without testing values?

Given x<z<y
Subtract Z from all
x-z<z-z<y-z or
x<0<y
and here we do not have anything for z hence not suff. Bunuel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,754
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,754
Kudos: 810,658
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Deepam10
Bunuel
Is the average (arithmetic mean) of the numbers x, y, and z greater than z ?

(1) z − x < y − z
(2) x < z < y


DS69502.01
OG2020 NEW QUESTION

On St2, can we do as below without testing values?

Given x<z<y
Subtract Z from all
x-z<z-z<y-z or
x<0<y
and here we do not have anything for z hence not suff. Bunuel

No. When subtracting z you get:

x - z < z - z < y - z
x - z < 0 < y - z

Which is not the same as x < 0 < y.

I'd say the most straightforward method to see that the second statement is insufficient is to recognize that the question essentially asks if the average of three numbers (x, y, and z) is more than the middle number (z), which obviously can't be determined.

Hope it helps.
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
109753 posts
498 posts
212 posts