Hi everyone, I feel extremely lucky to have been accepted to 4 great business schools' MBA programs. I'm having a tough time thinking about how to frame my decision and which school to choose, and if there's something important I'm not factoring into my decision. Long-time lurker, first time poster, so thanks in advance for your commentary/guidance!
--
Location: Canada
Pre-MBA Experience: Brand Management and Sales in F50 Consumer Goods/Healthcare Company.
ST Post-MBA Goal(s): MBB, PM at big tech, or work for high-growth/well-capitalized consumer startup (think Allbirds, Rent the Runway, etc).
Note I plan to come back to Canada, so having an alumni network here is important.LT Post-MBA Goal: Entrepreneurship
MBA Goals: Looking to build a strong foundation in predictive analytics and financial modelling, but I also question how much this will matter 3-5 years post-MBA once in a leadership role. I do not come from a technical background (business undergrad); while I did quite a bit of analysis at my job, I never did any in-depth financial or statistical modelling needed for consulting/finance/PM. I've had a lot of experience leading teams so soft skills seems like less of a focus; have a strong general management foundation.
Right now I am leaning towards HBS, with Sloan at a close second, but curious if anyone has a different perspective on how to approach this.
HBSPros- "Golden Passport"; classic business education with best brand in the world, best of the best with tons of opportunity and exposure
- Entrepreneurship is surprisingly strong here
- Strong Canadian (and global) alumni network, critical for LT goal of starting a company
- I love debate & discussion, so I think I will thrive in case method environment
- The general management school; as someone with a GM foundation, and with leadership aspirations, seems it would deliver
Cons- Skeptical of case method's ability to teach me analytics/financial modelling skill gaps, and worried employers (esp Tech PM & startups) won't believe i have it
- Culture seems a bit stuffier/in a bubble/less collaborative than others; not sure how well I'd fit in here (but this could be perception vs. reality)
- Since I have a business undergrad, academic freedom is important to me; worried RC year will be repetitive
Note: I'm not really eligible for financial aid so cost is equal to others.
MIT SloanPros- Culture seems like somewhere I'd fit in; creative, out of the box thinker types, focused on big ideas/changing the world, and less about pure profit maximization
- Strong focus on teaching technical skills in addition to leadership skills (MIT brand/education helps "prove" this to employers)
- Heavy entrepreneurship focus throughout school (even if less so on consumer)
- Has target industries I'm interested in (PM/Consulting/Startups)
- Large degree of academic freedom + action learning seems really applicable
Cons- Alumni network not as strong in Canada (but still has a great, highly recognized brand)
- Not sure how a qualitative marketing background would fit in in sea of STEM-types (can I really add value?)
- Is a technical education too in the weeds for someone who wants to lead people in the near future? I.e. will I actually use this in 3-5 years
Considering these less, but still wanted to throw out my reasoning:
KelloggPros- Student culture seems very inclusive and a "fun" place to be
- MMM can teach more "modern" skills relevant to tech/startups of design, user research, etc. which would help for PM, consulting, and entrepreneurship
- I like the heavy teamwork focus there
Cons- Weak brand & alumni in Canada
- Will feel pigeonholed in one area
- +$100K more CAD for dual degree (incl. living expenses)
- Seems more focused on partying & student clubs than education; not sure how much I'd really learn
- Low support for entrepreneurs and seems like weaker entrepreneurial spirit
BoothPros- Seems like it will be the best for giving me financial modelling / analytics foundation (upgrading my skills)
Cons- Living arrangements of commuting to Chicago seems bad for culture
- Low recognition and weak alumni in Canada
- Seems very finance focused; even with strong recruiting stats in other industries, feels like they'll be a less common path